Sign Up | Log In
FFF.NET 2.0
Addition of non-canon material to Firefly reference database?
Saturday, June 12, 2010 3:17 PM
HAKEN
Likes to mess with stuffs.
Saturday, June 12, 2010 5:45 PM
BYTEMITE
Saturday, June 12, 2010 8:17 PM
JEWELSTAITEFAN
Saturday, June 12, 2010 10:43 PM
Quote:Originally posted by jewelstaitefan: Not sure if it fits in with your concept, but I've made some posts about travel, navigation, duration in the verse, and how they integrate with the timeline of Firefly/Serenity. They are mostly listed in Blue Sun Room in the Writer's Resource Package thread. If you are interested and have further questions, let me know. I'm told that some fic writers use them as reference.
Sunday, June 13, 2010 1:52 AM
GWEK
Sunday, June 13, 2010 5:12 AM
NCBROWNCOAT
Sunday, June 13, 2010 9:06 AM
LWAVES
Sunday, June 13, 2010 1:31 PM
Quote:Originally posted by lwaves: So if you could have the whole database and then have a way to 'split' it so that peeps like myself can just see the canon stuff then great, go for it. If it was all mixed (even if non-canon stuff was highlighted in some way) then I say no.
Sunday, June 13, 2010 9:31 PM
Tuesday, June 15, 2010 10:05 AM
Quote:Originally posted by jewelstaitefan: The stuff I posted (in thread form) is not fiction, but not what I would claim to be canon - it can be trumped by canon presented by Joss or others. However it is derived from canon, concluded from canon. You might consider identifying what "level" of canon each item is. Directly canon, appearing in an episode, should have cites of specific source of data. Others might be specified, for instance how would The Map of the Verse be classed, canon, non-canon, derived from canon? The fanfic would clearly be non-canon. I wouldn't want anybody to think I claimed my conclusions were canon, and yet nobody should think I made it up of whole cloth.
Tuesday, June 15, 2010 10:27 AM
Tuesday, June 15, 2010 10:30 AM
Saturday, June 26, 2010 10:52 AM
Quote:Originally posted by Bytemite: A few of the threads that PN has posted and where there's been actual discussion that have gotten massive hit counts, probably because PN links to them or because they hit the right keywords for the conspiracy theorist fringes on topical issues. The highest I ever saw was like 14,000 or so. But yeah, those are still high thread counts.
Saturday, June 26, 2010 10:59 AM
YOUR OPTIONS
NEW POSTS TODAY
OTHER TOPICS
FFF.NET SOCIAL