Sign Up | Log In
REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS
Occupy Wall St. Orchestrated not in the street, but in the White House
Tuesday, October 25, 2011 7:14 AM
AURAPTOR
America loves a winner!
Quote: Hi everyone. It's been a while since I've written here. Been really busy with research, blogging and my radio show, but I wanted to share some info with you on the Occupy Wall st protest. First let me begin by telling you what you probably already know. It's the usual suspects. I'm sure you all remember Steve Lerner. He is a former ACORN boss. Lerner was one of the early organizers. Lerner has visited the White House numerous times, as well as keeping an active roll in ACORN. Wade Rathe is involved in the organizing, both here and abroad. Not ony is Rathke founder/head of ACORN International, but he is organizing the overseas arms as well. Maude Hurd, of ACORN fame made her presence known in the Boston protests this past week. Drummond Pike, from Tides foundation is supporting the groups. You all know Tides. Pike is former Weather Underground, as well as head of Tides. Soros is a huge donor to Tides, as well as other radicals , including Theresa Heinz kerry. We have gone over that before. Bill Ayers has posted the Occupy Wall st statement on his wordpress blog. Again, another Weather Underground member. On the Occupy Wall st website there is a section stating the stand in solidarity with MoveOn. You all know Move on. It was started by Jeff Jones and Tom Hayden. More Weather Underground . Now let's talk about Zucotti Park. That is the "privately owned" park where the protesters are camped. Zucotti Park is owned by a property group called Brookfield properties. Mayor Michale Bloomberg 's girlfriend, Diane Taylor, sits on the board of directors at Brookfield, so obviously there is a Bloomberg connection, but it gets even more incestouous. Brookfield also owns a company called Granite Wind, a subsidiary of Brookfield renewable energy. They just received a $168 million dollar green loan from Obama's DOE. Not only did they get the loan, but VP Joe Biden's son lobbied for the loan through his firm, Oldaker, Biden & Belair, which was founded by Biden's son. I bet you can already guess who is a major stockholder in Brookfield. You guessed it Soros. So in summary, Brookfield Properties owns Zucotti Park. Bloomberg's girlfriend sits on the board of Brookfield. Her name is Diane Taylor. Brookfield also owns Granite Wind in NH and NY. They received a $168 Mil dollar green loan from O's DOE. Joe Biden's son lobbied for the loan. Soros is a major stock holder in Brookfield. The use of Zucotti was return favor. Bloomberg is in a pickle now. The protest has spread to a public park. RE: Washington Square Park. I am sure the neighbors are thrilled. On top of the insider favors, the unions are all represented. I pointed out the SEIU connection, but AFL-CIO, Working Families party, various other ethnic groups are in the mix. I expect the buses full of LaRaza and the other ethnic groups to arrive this week. Here is links to all the info I have provided in this post: The DOE loan to Brookfield: http://www.earthtechling.com/2011/09/168-9m-granite-reliable-doe-loan-guarantee-finalized/ More on the DOE loan: Remember the name Brookfield Renewable Power. http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/06/21/idUS222907292120110621 Biden's kid lobbied for Brookfield to get the DOE loan: http://minx.cc/?post=322348 This is the one that says Bloomberg's GF is on the board of Brookfield: http://www.theatlanticwire.com/national/2011/10/more-who-controls-zuccotti-park/43414/ Here is the Soros stock info RE: Brookfield: http://www.gurufocus.com/stock.php?symbol=BAM This is Rathke's input: http://chieforganizer.org/2011/10/07/occupy-movement-and-boycott-bank-of-america/ Bill Ayers posted this statement for the protesters on his site: http://billayers.wordpress.com/2011/10/05/occupy-wall-street-collective-statement-of-the-protesters/ Can't forget Patrick Gaspard. He still works in the White House. He is ACORN's man in the inside.
Tuesday, October 25, 2011 7:21 AM
HKCAVALIER
Tuesday, October 25, 2011 7:24 AM
Tuesday, October 25, 2011 7:30 AM
BYTEMITE
Tuesday, October 25, 2011 8:51 AM
M52NICKERSON
DALEK!
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: Not sure I understand what you're asking, but it seems you can't / won't respond to the points brought up.
Tuesday, October 25, 2011 9:03 AM
Tuesday, October 25, 2011 9:11 AM
Tuesday, October 25, 2011 9:19 AM
Tuesday, October 25, 2011 10:21 AM
Quote:Originally posted by m52nickerson: You don't have any points, you have some loose associations. You have tin foil hat conspiracy theory 101. You have the next Glenn Beck special!
Tuesday, October 25, 2011 10:38 AM
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: The blogger ( not Glenn Beck, and not me ) has those clear and relevant observations. Scoff and mock all you want, but it still doesn't change 1 gorram thing.
Tuesday, October 25, 2011 10:45 AM
Tuesday, October 25, 2011 10:48 AM
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: And we see the crassic Saul Alinsky, 101. Ignore the facts, bypass the details, and go straight for the ad hominem attacks.
Quote:Originally posted by m52nickerson: More like Liberal: I believe X because the facts support it. Conservative: No that is a lie! Liberal: Which part, the facts or the conclusion? Conservative: Stop trying to confuse things, your wrong, you hate this country...USA, USA, USA.... Liberal: What? Conservative: Shut-up and listen you stupid socialist/commie/nazi. Liberal: Do you even know what those words mean? Conservative: They mean you hate this country, USA, USA, USA... Liberal: All you are doing is shooting off at the mouth. You’re not making any sense. Conservative: NO! I won't let you take my guns away! Liberal: WTF are you talking about. Conservative: You pinko-commies want to take my guns, you can have them when you pry them from my cold dead fingers. Liberal: When did we start talking about guns? Conservative: USA, USA, USA....you said shooting... USA, USA.... Liberal: Well maybe if you stopped chanting you would hear what I'm saying. Conservative: Now you want to take away my rights to free speech, never you socialist! Liberal: Your an idiot. Conservative: See that, all you liberals are the same; you can't have a decent conversation with liberals they just resort to name calling....USA, USA, USA...... I do not fear God, I fear the ignorance of man.
Tuesday, October 25, 2011 10:50 AM
Tuesday, October 25, 2011 10:56 AM
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: The problem is, you choose your own facts, which more times than not, aren't facts at all.
Tuesday, October 25, 2011 11:07 AM
Tuesday, October 25, 2011 11:11 AM
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: Ha ha... you're funny. Losers and low life commies finally coming out of the closet doesn't worry me in the least. Good to see the Democrats openly embrace them. If anything, it makes me smile.
Quote:Originally posted by Bytemite: So ultimately, it depends on whether you like those organizations or not, NOT whether or not they're involved (they are).
Tuesday, October 25, 2011 11:52 AM
FREMDFIRMA
Tuesday, October 25, 2011 12:04 PM
Tuesday, October 25, 2011 12:14 PM
Tuesday, October 25, 2011 1:05 PM
NIKI2
Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...
Quote: I have a plan for the 2012 elections. Instead of having great candidates beat on each other for for two years, how about we team them up? Yes folks, I am talking about running a Dream Team. Put it this way,..A long drawn out battle will weaken every one of them. There will be nobody left who will be able to beat the rock star Obama. Let's do this. Run Palin and Allen West, or Allen West and Herman Cain at the top of the ticket. That takes away the left's most potent weapon, the notorious race card. You all know it will be used until it falls apart if you run a white candidate. The truth doesn't matter with the race card. It's effective, so take it away. Put Palin as head of energy.That is certainly her strongest asset. Put Ron Paul at the Fed Reserve and Romney at the Treasury. Ron Paul is an expert on the Fed and Romney is a sharp business man. Both are suited for those positions. Michelle Bachmann would be perfect as head of the EPA. Put Huckabee on the Dept of Education. If Trump is serious, put him on the banking commission as head of Fannie and Freddie. He is in the business of properties and development. Bolton could be Defense secretary or even Secretary of State. Foreign policy is his strength http://www.blogster.com/joannemor/i-have-a-plan-for-the-2012-elections. you've got a bunch of bullshit posted by a nutcase right-wing blogger, and that's your "proof"? Gawd. Byte, you're buying into it. Before you were QUESTIONING the OccupyPolice and such; now you're convinced they're "involved"?? Which is it? I suppose that makes the Bethlehem Police Department part of the conspiracy, too, and it's inconceivable that ex-Marines, who are suffering the same things we all are, have no right to stand up and make their voices heard. Our "miltary" isn't involved, it's retired and non-active Marines only who are speaking up. It's all a really good crock of shit, I commend you Raptor. The ACTUAL and obvious ties to the Tea Party have been documented many times, the Koch Brothers' involvement and money, etc. Cav is absolutely right. If Obama were so smart and had such influence, there are a whole host of things he could have managed which he hasn't. I don't know where you got that I looked into the movement and found the same people "behind it". Could you clarify that please, because NONE of the people ranted about by Raptor were people I found behind anything. The post you linked to was about Adbsuters and how OWS got started...how are you connecting that to those Raptor's little blogger is harping on? The ONLY reference to Stephen Lerner being connected to Adbusters is, again, all over the internet by "FreeRepublic", "theblaze", "Redstate", "thenewamerican", "lunaticoutpost" (good name!), "conservapedia", "Teaparty.org"--in some cases they come up more than once--and tons of other obviously right-wing blogs. I gotta hand it to you guys, you're damned GOOD...I can't find any other link which would confirm Lerner is "behind" Adbusters or that Adbusters itself is some kind of subversive organization. I find lots of "Obama economic terrorism", "Adbusters, a Canadian “anti-consumerist” activist group began “subvertising” for a so-called Occupy Wall Street campaign, drawing from the publicity already in place for the Day of Rage. The Party was on!", "Unfortunately, the Left and its Complicit Media have co-opted most of the message and meaning of the OWS, draining it of any legitimate philosophical vigor and steering it towards the mortal shoals of inane class warfare rhetoric, the so-called “99%” pabulum. " The same sources show up page after page with the same stuff (how do they DO that, anyway?), slathering google and ensuring that nothing else shows up. What I find is stuff likeQuote:Leftist protest Occupy Wall Street is an ongoing anti-capitalism rally, with beginnings as an astroturfing campaign funded by a George Soros group called Adbusters; invoked by Bill Ayers "Days of Rage," the first Occupy protest was staged on September 17, 2011 in New York City after months of planning by co-founder of SEIU Stephen Lerner. Occupy Wall Street protesters consist of radicals, anarchists, nihilists, college students, hippies, special interest groups, labor unions and vendors. They dislike capitalism, blame greed, Wall Street and the banks for economic hardship, and have been seen spitting on U.S. Military personnel. Similar 'Occupy' demonstrations have spread to a dozen cities, and has caused thousands of arrests across the United States. The Occupy Wall Street movement was inspired by the Arab Spring protests in Cairo that were organized by the Muslim Brotherhood. Egyptians camped out in Tahir Square until Hosni Mubarak resigned. Jezus, they sound like PN (without the Jewphobia). I'm not going to buy into "debating" something this disgusting. I figured it wouldn't take the right too long to gear up and start trying to demonize it; I'd say they were just about right on time. Good little soldier, Raptor, good little soldier.
Quote:Leftist protest Occupy Wall Street is an ongoing anti-capitalism rally, with beginnings as an astroturfing campaign funded by a George Soros group called Adbusters; invoked by Bill Ayers "Days of Rage," the first Occupy protest was staged on September 17, 2011 in New York City after months of planning by co-founder of SEIU Stephen Lerner. Occupy Wall Street protesters consist of radicals, anarchists, nihilists, college students, hippies, special interest groups, labor unions and vendors. They dislike capitalism, blame greed, Wall Street and the banks for economic hardship, and have been seen spitting on U.S. Military personnel. Similar 'Occupy' demonstrations have spread to a dozen cities, and has caused thousands of arrests across the United States. The Occupy Wall Street movement was inspired by the Arab Spring protests in Cairo that were organized by the Muslim Brotherhood. Egyptians camped out in Tahir Square until Hosni Mubarak resigned.
Tuesday, October 25, 2011 1:28 PM
Quote:Before you were QUESTIONING the OccupyPolice and such; now you're convinced they're "involved"?? Which is it?
Tuesday, October 25, 2011 1:38 PM
Quote:Originally posted by BYTEMITE: My response was to the Glen Beck picture Nick posted, and in that picture, all of those entities can be confirmed to have a connection to the OWS movement. In the link I posted, you did some research with me, and we came to the same conclusion.
STORYMARK
Tuesday, October 25, 2011 1:39 PM
Tuesday, October 25, 2011 2:38 PM
Quote:I see forces moving, not just the protesters. The protesters don't realize, but they're (note: THEY ARE, not even they might be) a smokescreen, to distract attention. They might even be pawns, which is truly frightening - pawns are considered expendable, and are sacrificed.
Quote:In short, this pings me as classic problem-solution-crisis model. State a problem. Tell people the solution is to give you some kind of power. People balk initially. Create a CRISIS! People flock back to you to RESTORE ORDER. Of course, the point of it is to pass that initial solution, and then some. In restoring order, the grip tightens that much more, the gap between have and have not, powerful and powerless increases. The other option is that it's Divide And Conquer, with the Tea Party as the other astroturf. Neither side is intended to accomplish anything, which is why both are so bent on working in the system (and not changing anything). It's only met to polarize and pit the opposite sides against each other, hijacking that tribal partisanship so many people have bought into. Very possibly it's both, as the partisan back and forth distracts from the more insidious efforts both sides are secretly working towards.
Quote:Niki looked into this too, and she found much the same people behind it. However, she believes that doesn't necessarily make the movement NOT a grassroots movement.
Quote:In the link I posted, you did some research with me, and we came to the same conclusion.
Tuesday, October 25, 2011 2:47 PM
Quote: My response was to the Glen Beck picture Nick posted, and in that picture, all of those entities can be confirmed to have a connection to the OWS movement.
Quote: You don't have any points, you have some loose associations. You have tin foil hat conspiracy theory 101. You have the next Glenn Beck special!
Quote: The issue I have is that just because there are connections does not mean there is a grander scheme
Tuesday, October 25, 2011 2:49 PM
Quote:Originally posted by Storymark: Golly, how'd I know this was a Rap'thread? The Obama derangement reeks 'round here.
Tuesday, October 25, 2011 3:17 PM
Quote:Originally posted by Bytemite: I am NOT right wing. I have never claimed that they are cry babies. I am concerned the movement might be astroturf taking advantage of good people. I am afraid FOR the protesters, I am afraid for all of us. I see forces moving, not just the protesters. The protesters don't realize, but they're a smokescreen, to distract attention. They might even be pawns, which is truly frightening - pawns are considered expendable, and are sacrificed. Why is it global? Why is it GLOBALIST?
Tuesday, October 25, 2011 3:27 PM
Quote:And while I have you here, Byte. Maybe I missed it, but I've yet to read what you're so afraid is gonna happen here? I thought for a while that you were afraid of a government crackdown or the like, but now it's looking as if you actually fear the protestors--what do you see?
Tuesday, October 25, 2011 3:35 PM
Quote:I'm disagreeing forcefully with you and deriding you or anyone ELSE who puts their faith in Glen Beck!
Tuesday, October 25, 2011 3:41 PM
Tuesday, October 25, 2011 3:53 PM
Tuesday, October 25, 2011 4:03 PM
Tuesday, October 25, 2011 4:18 PM
Tuesday, October 25, 2011 4:23 PM
Quote: According to disclosure documents from 2007-2009, Soros' Open Society gave grants of $3.5 million to San Francisco-based Tides Center. Tides then gave Adbusters grants totaling $185,000. Was Soros responsible for the grants to Adbusters? That's unclear.
Quote:Several months ago, the California Highway Patrol diverted a wacko fan of right-wing websites and Glenn Beck’s Fox News show from opening fire on our offices. After a 15-minute shootout, he was taken into custody and is now awaiting trial. Among the many lies and misrepresentations repeated by the sites and shows that the gunman, Byron Williams, watched and listened to was the bizarre idea that George Soros “owns” the Tides organizations — through which he is allegedly pursuing a nefarious agenda to destroy America. As a public charity, Tides is not owned by Soros, nor was it started by him. Soros is the founder and chairman of the Open Society Institute. It is just one of hundreds of funders that partner with Tides in programs to promote economic justice, democratic processes and human rights. The Open Society funds are only a small percentage of Tides’ total contributions — far less than 5 percent of our $112 million total in 2009. Amid the cacophony of screed, I didn’t focus on these lies about Soros. It has been bad enough to try to wrap my mind around how Beck and others were repeatedly labeling us “communists” and “socialists” and “anti-American” — on a channel that describes itself as “fair.” Tides may be progressive, but we are enthusiastically American. Were it not for the capitalist system, not a dollar would flow through Tides. Families, foundations, corporations and collaborative groups use our services to make charitable contributions to nonprofit organizations that they recommend for grants. I recently attended a dinner party hosted by Soros. We’d been introduced once some years ago, but I’d never spoken to him before. In the course of the evening, he captivated the table as he talked about the economy and current affairs. As I was leaving, he posed an unexpected question. What did it feel like, he asked, to have had an “assassin” headed for our offices? I have gotten many similar questions — though no one had used the word “assassin.” I responded that it deeply shocked and stunned us. In some ways, I don’t think we’ve come to grips with the idea that something like this could happen in the country we’ve tried to make a better place for everyone — as do many in the nonprofit sector. Later, back in my hotel room, I started thinking about Soros some more. Why has he become the object of such anger? It is not uncommon that financial leaders become demonized over business accomplishments. There are legendary targets, as John Rockefeller was in his day. Or executives like Charles Keating Jr., Michael Milken and Ken Lay, who break the law — something of which Soros has never been accused. Through his philanthropy, Soros has also made extraordinary contributions to this country and around the globe — especially in Eastern Europe. In many ways, he demonstrates what is great and vibrant about America. He is certainly not the only U.S. immigrant to have accumulated a staggering fortune. Nor is he the only wealthy person to create a philanthropy focused on protecting human rights and improving the lot of marginalized communities. His interest in contributing to politics can’t quite explain it either. There are hundreds of Americans who give in similar or greater amounts to candidates and one or another of the parties. Warren Buffett and the “Google boys” fly in private planes. Bill Gates has created a bigger philanthropy. Vinod Khosla is both an immigrant and, like Soros, an enormously successful capitalist. Oprah Winfrey has built a media empire and is openly supportive of President Barack Obama. So, what is it about Soros? I don’t know. It might be that he speaks with a pronounced Hungarian accent. Perhaps it's because he’s proven himself smarter than most lions of Wall Street. For example, he foresaw the housing bubble and, unlike almost everyone else in the financial industry who denigrated his concerns, positioned his investments correctly in anticipation of the debacle. Or maybe it’s because he is passionate about human rights and the plight of immigrants. His Open Society Foundations, for example, focus on the Roma people — marginalized immigrants throughout central Europe, and they have a long commitment to the people of Burma, where a military regime has attacked human rights for many years. But Soros is somehow viewed as the avatar of evil by intolerant right-wing extremists. It is about time to call out this baseless criticism for what it is: bullying in its worst form, using an individual for political gain. Glenn Beck, and his sponsor, Rupert Murdoch, who, like Soros, is an immigrant, may think they have the right to knowingly foster lies about Soros — and Tides, for that matter — though, as we have seen, it can lead extremists to pursue violence. In most matters in this world, balance returns and those who have pushed the pendulum’s arc in one direction must deal with the fact that it inevitably reverses course. But I’m scared for Soros. He is lambasted by the likes of Beck more than anyone. As the would-be “assassin” recently indicated, Beck says he doesn’t advocate violence — but Williams is probably not the only unbalanced soul out there who wants to “start the revolution” with an act of violence. All of us, including Beck, need to take more responsibility for how we speak of others. Especially about those with whom we disagree. Otherwise, when bad things happen, we share the responsibility. (by Drummond Pike , the founder and chief executive officer of Tides Foundation) http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1010/44343.html as biased a view as the view from the other side, but I have to ask: How much do you or any of us actually KNOW, for fact, about Soros, and how much is the way his name has been used? I'm going to do some research, just for my own edification, before deciding anything. But back to my problem. My problem is that by playing Six Degrees of Separation, anyone on any side can make up nefarious "connections" to anything they want. I don't necessarily buy it. As to your feelings, I'm not sure I said anything at all about your feelings, I don't know where you got that idea. I've been discussing facts, as best I can find them. I don't know where you get the "discredit" thing you've now accused me of twice...why can't one disagree without it being an attempt to discredit? By the way, I don't think I'm defensive, I think I'm angry, mostly that some people immediately reach for something bad to be behind virtually everything--especially anything they don't agree with (again, NOT meaning just you, or even primarily you). Now I've got to go eat dinner, I've spent WAY too long at this. For me, until I see some kind of VALID proof, and given how it's sprung up so many places on it's own--and yes, it's on its own here, I KNOW that, and I'm sure other places--I'm not going to jump to the conclusion that OWS is astroturf or a conspiracy or anything else. We'll just agree to disagree on that point. Until something VALID proves one of us wrong.
Tuesday, October 25, 2011 4:33 PM
Tuesday, October 25, 2011 4:39 PM
Quote:By the way, I don't think I'm defensive, I think I'm angry, mostly that some people immediately reach for something bad to be behind virtually everything--especially anything they don't agree with (again, NOT meaning just you, or even primarily you).
Tuesday, October 25, 2011 6:09 PM
1KIKI
Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.
Tuesday, October 25, 2011 6:52 PM
RIONAEIRE
Beir bua agus beannacht
Wednesday, October 26, 2011 7:03 AM
Wednesday, October 26, 2011 9:15 AM
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: That your knee jerk reaction is to cry 'Obama derangement' only shows how dead on the mark it is.
Wednesday, October 26, 2011 9:17 AM
Quote:Originally posted by 1kiki: "... has confirmed a number of the backers ..." Backers? Or co-participants? Just b/c different individuals and groups more or less agree on one thing (maybe we SHOULD run the country for the benefit of the people and not Wall Street - what a concept!) doesn't mean select associated groups or people are 'running' the whole movement.
Wednesday, October 26, 2011 10:14 AM
Wednesday, October 26, 2011 10:27 AM
Wednesday, October 26, 2011 10:30 AM
Quote:Originally posted by BYTEMITE: Yes, a video, a website, (both later, in fairness, proven to not actually have any affiliation) and hundreds of similar protests cropping up globally within the week. Also, a close look at the origins of the movement does suggest they weren't initially organized on a local level. Clearly I'm out of line having an opinion. 9_9
Wednesday, October 26, 2011 10:32 AM
Wednesday, October 26, 2011 12:26 PM
Quote:Originally posted by Storymark: Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: That your knee jerk reaction is to cry 'Obama derangement' only shows how dead on the mark it is. Skippy, I call it derangement because you are a fucking deranged little ball of hate. And you're Hi-Larious.
Wednesday, October 26, 2011 12:49 PM
Quote:hundreds of similar protests cropping up globally within the week.
Wednesday, October 26, 2011 1:13 PM
YOUR OPTIONS
NEW POSTS TODAY
OTHER TOPICS
FFF.NET SOCIAL