REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Obama ended up winning the popular vote by 3.85%

POSTED BY: KPO
UPDATED: Saturday, January 5, 2013 07:53
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 569
PAGE 1 of 1

Friday, January 4, 2013 8:22 AM

KPO

Sometimes you own the libs. Sometimes, the libs own you.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, January 4, 2013 10:19 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Romney ended up with right around, ummmm...


Forty-seven percent.



I'll let that irony sink in.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, January 5, 2013 7:53 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Yeah, ironic as hell, ain't it? And nobody missed the irony, either. AND, Obama's margin of victory was pretty impressive...uhhh, didn't Bush say e got a "mandate" from the people? What does that mean about Obama's victory?
Quote:

Obama’s Margin of Victory is Now Bigger than Both of George W. Bush’s Wins

President Obama’s popular margin of victory is bigger than both of George W. Bush’s election wins in 2000 and 2004.

According to the numbers compiled by David Wasserman of the Cook Political Report, President Obama now leads Mitt Romney 50.81%-47.48% in the popular vote. President Obama’s popular vote margin is now bigger than both of the last two successful Republican presidential elections. In 2000, George W. Bush lost the popular vote to Al Gore, 48.38%-47.87%. In 2004, George W. Bush defeated John Kerry in the popular vote, 50.73%-48.27%. Obama is currently posting the biggest margin of victory since Bill Clinton beat Bob Dole, 49.24%-40.71% in 1996.

What was supposed to be a nail biter of an election turned out to be only the 13th closest election in US history. Obama’s margin of victory was bigger than four other modern era (since 1952) winning candidates. George W. Bush (2000 & 2004), Jimmy Carter (1976), and Richard Nixon (1968) all had smaller margins of victory than Obama did.

This means that the bluster coming from the right about President Obama not having a mandate is nothing more than political hot air. Due to the fact that many of the yet to be counted ballots are in New York and California, President Obama’s margin of victory is expected to grow. http://www.politicususa.com/obamas-margin-victory-bigger-george-w-bush
s-wins.html
virtue of rounding, Romney’s share of the popular vote will be recorded here and elsewhere as 47 percent, so long as it doesn’t rise above 47.5 percent again.

Romney’s vote share will actually head more toward 47 percent flat — 47.1 percent or 47.2 percent — because many of the outstanding ballots in the presidential race come from California and New York, which both voted for Obama by a large margin. http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2012/11/26/romneys-fina
l-share-of-the-vote-you-guessed-it-47-percent/?wprss=rss_politics
current vote total has Mr. Obama winning just under 65 million votes nationwide, while Republican Mitt Romney won 60.5 million.

That translates into 50.88% of the popular vote for the president. Mr. Romney is at 47.4%–which happens to round down to that same 47% number that got him into so much trouble in the campaign’s latter stages, when a secretly recorded tape of remarks at a fundraiser showed him saying 47% of Americans wouldn’t vote for him because they didn’t pay taxes and looked to the government for help.

Mr. Obama’s 50.88% of the vote is just above the 50.7% George W. Bush took in winning re-election in 2004, and his margin of victory of just over four million votes surpasses the Bush margin of just over three million votes.

As a footnote: Mr. Obama’s margin of victory may well have been larger if not for Hurricane Sandy. The hurricane’s aftermath significantly suppressed turnout in New York and New Jersey, both blue states in presidential politics. In New York, turnout fell 17.08% from 2008, while in New Jersey it was down 7.68%.As a footnote: Mr. Obama’s margin of victory may well have been larger if not for Hurricane Sandy. The hurricane’s aftermath significantly suppressed turnout in New York and New Jersey, both blue states in presidential politics. In New York, turnout fell 17.08% from 2008, while in New Jersey it was down 7.68%.


And in the end:
Quote:

Final Tally Shows Obama First Since ’56 to Win 51% Twice

Barack Obama is the first president in more than five decades to win at least 51 percent of the national popular vote twice, according to a revised vote count in New York eight weeks after the Nov. 6 election.

State election officials submitted a final tally on Dec. 31 that added about 400,000 votes, most of them from provisional ballots in the Democratic stronghold of New York City that were counted late in part because of complications caused by Hurricane Sandy.

The president nationally won 65.9 million votes -- or 51.1 percent -- against Republican challenger Mitt Romney, who took 60.9 million votes and 47.2 percent of the total cast, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

Obama is the first president to achieve the 51 percent mark in two elections since Republican Dwight D. Eisenhower, who did it in 1952 and 1956, and the first Democrat to do so since Franklin D. Roosevelt, who won four consecutive White House races. Roosevelt received 53.4 percent of the vote -- his lowest -- in his last race in 1944.

In just four states -- Florida, North Carolina, Ohio and Virginia -- was the winning candidate’s margin of victory less than 5 percentage points, the smallest number of states below that threshold since 1984, when three states were within 5 points amid Reagan’s 18-point victory in the popular vote over Democrat Walter Mondale.

The Nov. 6 results underscore challenges for Republicans as they seek an Electoral College majority in 2016 and beyond. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-01-03/final-tally-shows-obama-first
-since-56-to-win-51-twice.html
? Romney finishes with 47 percent of the presidential vote

One of the major moments of the 2012 presidential election was Mitt Romney's now-infamous "47 percent" remarks. But, ah, does the world not work in strange and mysterious ways? The final presidential vote count was released Friday, and Romney received, wait for it, 47 percent of the popular vote (47.2 to be exact). If anything, it shows the cosmos has a sense of humor. http://now.msn.com/romney-got-47-percent-of-presidential-vote


Somehow it just seems terribly appropriate that Romney ended up with 47%. I get the feeling that number may follow him through history...

Tit for tat got us where we are today. If we want to be grownups, we need to resist the ugliness. If we each did, this would be a better reflection on Firefly and a more welcome place. I will try.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
Elections; 2024
Tue, November 5, 2024 16:22 - 4516 posts
What kind of superpower could China be?
Tue, November 5, 2024 16:02 - 54 posts
End of the Democratic Party (not kidding)
Tue, November 5, 2024 14:18 - 56 posts
Disgruntled Tepublicans vow to move to Australia
Tue, November 5, 2024 13:53 - 76 posts
Kamala Harris for President
Tue, November 5, 2024 13:47 - 639 posts
The kids are the ones who will remember...
Tue, November 5, 2024 13:42 - 5 posts
A thread for Democrats Only
Tue, November 5, 2024 13:32 - 6920 posts
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Tue, November 5, 2024 13:15 - 4676 posts
Now we get everything we ever wanted! It's a Celebration!!!!
Tue, November 5, 2024 13:11 - 3 posts
Mid-Term Elections 2022. Hey Jack, I Was Right
Tue, November 5, 2024 13:08 - 412 posts
Oh well
Tue, November 5, 2024 13:06 - 29 posts
Are You- Democrat or Republican
Tue, November 5, 2024 13:04 - 55 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL