REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

NRA offers solutions, Liberals offer nothing

POSTED BY: HERO
UPDATED: Saturday, February 2, 2013 10:52
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 1714
PAGE 1 of 1

Friday, February 1, 2013 10:00 AM

HERO


We already know from FBI statistics that the 1994 gun ban had no impact on the violent crime rate or shootings.

After Sandy Hook the NRA came out suggesting that more gun control was not the answer. They proposed that there be more training, that teachers and other faculty should be allowed to carry if they choose. Most importantly they said that every school should have a police officer.

Liberal want a comprehensive gun ban.

Two examples:

In Chicago, home of some of the most restrictive gun laws in the country there has been a massive increase in gun violence and ultimately this: www.cnn.com/2013/01/30/justice/illinois-teen-shot/index.htm

In Atlanta where an off duty law enforcement officer was at a local school there was this: http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/world/55742445-68/shooting-atlanta-police
-says.html.csp


Seems to me the evidence is clear. Officer in every school and NO gun ban.

H

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, February 1, 2013 10:08 AM

M52NICKERSON

DALEK!


The so called assult weapons ban had so many holes in it that was not a ban at all. Plus other than assult weapons liberals are not calling for a comprehensive gun ban.

I know it is far easy for you to argue against strawman than it is to pull your head out of your ass and argue agaist anything real but can you at least try.

It will be easier that trying to fake being a lawyer.

I do not fear God, I fear the ignorance of man.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, February 1, 2013 10:18 AM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

Originally posted by Hero:

Liberal want a comprehensive gun ban.


No, Liberal does NOT want a comprehensive gun ban. Nor do Liberals in general. Nor do I.

What a maroon.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, February 1, 2013 10:33 AM

HERO


Quote:

Originally posted by chrisisall:
No, Liberal does NOT want a comprehensive gun ban. Nor do Liberals in general. Nor do I.


I read the legislation they proposed. It includes a ban on numerous rifles, shotguns, and handguns as well as magazine capacity and the private sale of weapons.

Its a comprehnsive gun ban. In New York they rushed through an even more extreme measure into law. Ban...its what they want. They'd go door to door if they thought they could get away with it (and we all know they've been talking about that).

The NRA would go door to door too...offering you classes and training and the opportunity to safely exercise your rights.

H

Hero...must be right on all of this. ALL of the rest of us are wrong. Chrisisall, 2012

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, February 1, 2013 10:52 AM

JONGSSTRAW


Quote:

Originally posted by Hero:

The NRA would go door to door too...offering you classes and training and the opportunity to safely exercise your rights.


There's no such thing as "safely" when it comes to guns. Family members get shot by accident because "trained" users forget there's a bullet in the chamber of their semi-automatic handgun. Innocents get shot because those same handguns jam and misfire when they're not supposed to. Rifles and shotguns usually have "safeties", but people forget if they're on or off.

That actually happened to me years ago on a duck hunting trip in Maryland with my friend George and his black lab Buck. I "always" kept my Remington automatic shotgun with the safety on...always! We were going down the Transquaking River and got out of the john boat to set up our blind along the bank. As I hit the bank I stumbled and my shotgun went off. I could not believe it, having always been so damned careful about that safety. I could have killed my friend and/or his dog, but luckily the blast went straight into the marshy mud. It scared the hell out of me.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, February 1, 2013 11:10 AM

M52NICKERSON

DALEK!


Quote:

Originally posted by Hero:
In New York they rushed through an even more extreme measure into law. Ban...its what they want.



Really, name one gun now banned in NY because of the new law.

I do not fear God, I fear the ignorance of man.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, February 1, 2013 11:33 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Amen Nick
Quote:

The so called assult weapons ban had so many holes in it that was not a ban at all. Plus other than assult weapons liberals are not calling for a comprehensive gun ban.

I know it is far easy for you to argue against strawman than it is to pull your head out of your ass and argue agaist anything real but can you at least try.

It will be easier that trying to fake being a lawyer.


And Amen Chris, as well. And Jong.

Not-A-Hero, as always, is full of

Tit for tat got us where we are today. If we want to be grownups, we need to resist the ugliness. If we each did, this would be a better reflection on Firefly and a more welcome place. I will try.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, February 1, 2013 11:48 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


When reality doesn't go "Hero's" way, he's very happy to just make up his own "facts".


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, February 1, 2013 11:52 AM

STORYMARK


Quote:

Originally posted by Kwicko:
When reality doesn't go "Hero's" way, he's very happy to just make up his own "facts".



Like every moronic asshole wingnut.




Excuse me while I soak in all these sweet, sweet conservative tears.

"We will never have the elite, smart people on our side." -- Rick "Frothy" Santorum

"Goram it kid, let's frak this thing and go home! Engage!"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, February 1, 2013 12:33 PM

PENQUIN11


Every time I read a forum I become more and more afraid that if I somehow screw up in my logic that an army of 6-7 liberals will come in and crush me into dust.

Anyways on the topic of Assault Rifle bans I will simply say that it doesn't make much sense from my perspective. Guns are only present in a fraction of violent crimes as it is (2%), and I believe that only 2% of that 2% of violent crimes with guns are with Assault Rifles (numbers inside of numbers- mathception). Moreover most high grade hunting rifles (the ones you see in magazines and such) are AR-15 mods, which may land them under the bans.... Anyways I haven't done a bunch of research, and I will admit that I don't quite know why anyone would ever need an assault rifle, however given the lack of statistics as it pertains to crime, I don't see an adeuquate reason to ban them...

"But who prays for Satan? Who, in eighteen centuries, has had the common humanity to pray for the one sinner that needed it the most?"- Mark Twain

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, February 1, 2013 12:36 PM

STORYMARK


Quote:

Originally posted by penquin11:
Every time I read a forum I become more and more afraid that if I somehow screw up in my logic that an army of 6-7 liberals will come in and crush me into dust.

Anyways on the topic of Assault Rifle bans I will simply say that it doesn't make much sense from my perspective. Guns are only present in a fraction of violent crimes as it is (2%), and I believe that only 2% of that 2% of violent crimes with guns are with Assault Rifles (numbers inside of numbers- mathception). Moreover most high grade hunting rifles (the ones you see in magazines and such) are AR-15 mods, which may land them under the bans.... Anyways I haven't done a bunch of research, and I will admit that I don't quite know why anyone would ever need an assault rifle, however given the lack of statistics as it pertains to crime, I don't see an adeuquate reason to ban them...

"But who prays for Satan? Who, in eighteen centuries, has had the common humanity to pray for the one sinner that needed it the most?"- Mark Twain



Their usage in overall crime is low, this is true. Their use in the ever-growing area of mass shootings is quite significantly higher.

And having some slips in your logic is fine - happens to us all. Its when after having such a slip, one then demand that it is ABSOLUTE, even in the face of clearly contradictory facts, and that everyone who doesn't agree with demonstrably false notions (we call them rapfacts in these parts) is a traitor intent on destroying 'Merica, that they end up in rappy/"hero" territory.

Ive seen no such tendencies from you, thankfully.




Excuse me while I soak in all these sweet, sweet conservative tears.

"We will never have the elite, smart people on our side." -- Rick "Frothy" Santorum

"Goram it kid, let's frak this thing and go home! Engage!"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, February 1, 2013 12:54 PM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

Originally posted by penquin11:
Anyways I haven't done a bunch of research, and I will admit that I don't quite know why anyone would ever need an assault rifle, however given the lack of statistics as it pertains to crime, I don't see an adequate reason to ban them...

Honestly? Well, once or twice a year some nut shoots a bunch of people & kills most of em, numbering between 5 & 15 people each, and usually a semi-auto rifle is used, and it's an emotional issue, so many feel that banning the weapons all together will make it harder for a suicidal/homicidal maniac to easily achieve his ends... then we can hope the homicidal/suicidal maniac doesn't have access to a flamethrower, or can get his hands on fertilizer, or doesn't decide to bring 5 shotguns instead, or doesn't just bring a big ole' thing of gasoline & a lighter, or a jar of ball bearings with a stick of dynamite in the center, or....

Well, you get the idea, right?

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, February 1, 2013 1:01 PM

STORYMARK


Quote:

Originally posted by chrisisall:
Honestly? Well, once or twice a year some nut shoots a bunch of people & kills most of em,



Once or twice a year....? You might need to revise your stats a bit, Chris.




Excuse me while I soak in all these sweet, sweet conservative tears.

"We will never have the elite, smart people on our side." -- Rick "Frothy" Santorum

"Goram it kid, let's frak this thing and go home! Engage!"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, February 1, 2013 1:29 PM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

Originally posted by Storymark:

Once or twice a year....? You might need to revise your stats a bit, Chris.

4 or 5 then? Recently? Over the last 30 years the average is 2 per year.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2012/12/14/nine-facts-
about-guns-and-mass-shootings-in-the-united-states
/
Okay, I have no personal care if assault weapons are banned, whatever. It's just that loopholes and general non-enforcement will be the way it goes. Decisions on enforcement will affect law abiding citizens most of all, because bullies like an easy target. Easy is the operative word. Going after Gun show creeps & private sales, and illegal sales and illegal weapons will be lost on popping the EASY perps. Like getting a kid with a bag of weed instead of the smarter, dirtier drug lord. Or ticketing the guy doing 10 miles over the limit on a highway instead of the creep doing 45 in a residential zone with kids present because HE has a radar detector.
EASY. Does it.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, February 1, 2013 3:12 PM

M52NICKERSON

DALEK!


Quote:

Originally posted by Storymark:
Quote:

Originally posted by penquin11:
Every time I read a forum I become more and more afraid that if I somehow screw up in my logic that an army of 6-7 liberals will come in and crush me into dust.

Anyways on the topic of Assault Rifle bans I will simply say that it doesn't make much sense from my perspective. Guns are only present in a fraction of violent crimes as it is (2%), and I believe that only 2% of that 2% of violent crimes with guns are with Assault Rifles (numbers inside of numbers- mathception). Moreover most high grade hunting rifles (the ones you see in magazines and such) are AR-15 mods, which may land them under the bans.... Anyways I haven't done a bunch of research, and I will admit that I don't quite know why anyone would ever need an assault rifle, however given the lack of statistics as it pertains to crime, I don't see an adeuquate reason to ban them...

"But who prays for Satan? Who, in eighteen centuries, has had the common humanity to pray for the one sinner that needed it the most?"- Mark Twain



Their usage in overall crime is low, this is true. Their use in the ever-growing area of mass shootings is quite significantly higher.

And having some slips in your logic is fine - happens to us all. Its when after having such a slip, one then demand that it is ABSOLUTE, even in the face of clearly contradictory facts, and that everyone who doesn't agree with demonstrably false notions (we call them rapfacts in these parts) is a traitor intent on destroying 'Merica, that they end up in rappy/"hero" territory.

Ive seen no such tendencies from you, thankfully.




Excuse me while I soak in all these sweet, sweet conservative tears.

"We will never have the elite, smart people on our side." -- Rick "Frothy" Santorum

"Goram it kid, let's frak this thing and go home! Engage!"



Looking at some of the past shooting I'm sure if banning assault weapons would make a difference. I would like to see someone do a statistical analysis or the like and see what it says.

I do not fear God, I fear the ignorance of man.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, February 1, 2013 5:39 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by Hero:
We already know from FBI statistics that the 1994 gun ban had no impact on the violent crime rate or shootings.



Really. You "know" that, do ya?





Gosh, what's that sudden downturn that takes place around the time the AWB went into effect?



Quote:


After Sandy Hook the NRA came out suggesting that more gun control was not the answer. They proposed that there be more training, that teachers and other faculty should be allowed to carry if they choose. Most importantly they said that every school should have a police officer.




And how are they proposing to pay for that?

Quote:


Liberal want a comprehensive gun ban.



Nope.

Quote:



In Chicago, home of some of the most restrictive gun laws in the country there has been a massive increase in gun violence and ultimately this: www.cnn.com/2013/01/30/justice/illinois-teen-shot/index.htm



Where are those guns being bought? In Chicago, or outside Chicago, where there's practically zero regulation?

Quote:


Seems to me the evidence is clear. Officer in every school and NO gun ban.




Again, I'd love to see your plan for paying for this police state Utopia you envision. Will you be taking that money out of the defense budget, for example?



"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero

"I was wrong" - Hero, 2012

Mitt Romney, introducing his running mate: "Join me in welcoming the next President of the United States, Paul Ryan!"

Rappy's response? "You're lying, gullible ( believing in some BS you heard on msnbc ) or hard of hearing."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, February 1, 2013 5:50 PM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

Originally posted by Hero:

Its a comprehnsive gun ban.

Friends don't let friends post drunk.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, February 2, 2013 1:59 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)




One of the apparent "solutions" offered by conservatives was to trot out Ol' Heartless, Dick Cheney himself, to talk about gun safety on FauxNews.

Yeah... when your go-to guy on gun safety is the dude who got drunk and shot his friend in the face, you've pretty much hit the bottom of the barrel. Dick Cheney is to gun safety what shooting your friend in the face is to shooting your friend in the face.



"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero

"I was wrong" - Hero, 2012

Mitt Romney, introducing his running mate: "Join me in welcoming the next President of the United States, Paul Ryan!"

Rappy's response? "You're lying, gullible ( believing in some BS you heard on msnbc ) or hard of hearing."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, February 2, 2013 2:09 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


BTW, "Hero", if more access to guns leads to fewer shootings, then why don't you support an abortion clinic on every corner with drive-thru Plan B availability? It would virtually wipe out abortion in this country, according to your logic.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, February 2, 2013 4:58 AM

GEEZER

Keep the Shiny side up


Quote:

Originally posted by Jongsstraw:
That actually happened to me years ago on a duck hunting trip in Maryland with my friend George and his black lab Buck. I "always" kept my Remington automatic shotgun with the safety on...always! We were going down the Transquaking River and got out of the john boat to set up our blind along the bank. As I hit the bank I stumbled and my shotgun went off. I could not believe it, having always been so damned careful about that safety. I could have killed my friend and/or his dog, but luckily the blast went straight into the marshy mud. It scared the hell out of me.



And now you know not to have a round in the chamber until you're in the blind and ready to shoot. You also have probably figured out that having a 'safety' is no substitute for common-sense gun handling rules, like never putting your finger on the trigger until you're ready to shoot, and always being aware of where the gun is pointed, even when you believe it's empty or on 'safe'.

If your shotgun fired without your finger on the trigger, I hope you took it to a qualifed gunsmith to have it fixed.


"When your heart breaks, you choose what to fill the cracks with. Love or hate. But hate won't ever heal. Only love can do that."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, February 2, 2013 7:03 AM

JONGSSTRAW


Quote:

Originally posted by Geezer:
Quote:

Originally posted by Jongsstraw:
That actually happened to me years ago on a duck hunting trip in Maryland with my friend George and his black lab Buck. I "always" kept my Remington automatic shotgun with the safety on...always! We were going down the Transquaking River and got out of the john boat to set up our blind along the bank. As I hit the bank I stumbled and my shotgun went off. I could not believe it, having always been so damned careful about that safety. I could have killed my friend and/or his dog, but luckily the blast went straight into the marshy mud. It scared the hell out of me.



And now you know not to have a round in the chamber until you're in the blind and ready to shoot. You also have probably figured out that having a 'safety' is no substitute for common-sense gun handling rules, like never putting your finger on the trigger until you're ready to shoot, and always being aware of where the gun is pointed, even when you believe it's empty or on 'safe'.

If your shotgun fired without your finger on the trigger, I hope you took it to a qualifed gunsmith to have it fixed.


Some of what you point out is true. Some of it was my fault. But I was no rookie. I had hunted at least a dozen times before for waterfowl and game without incident. In this instance my shotgun was loaded because we were ready to shoot at ducks while we were still in the boat. When we landed the boat I got out and my feet got tangled in the marshy grass and mud. My shotgun discharged into the bank because I was not carrying it recklessly. If I had been reckless someone would have been hit. As for my finger being on the trigger, it must have been. It was a serious mistake made subconsciously and stupidly. But I'm only human, and humans make mistakes. That was the point of my post. No one is infallible. I sold the gun and never went hunting again.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, February 2, 2013 8:01 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by Hero:


Seems to me the evidence is clear. Officer in every school and NO gun ban.





It'll be a sad day for this country if children can safely attend their classes only under the protection of armed guards.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, February 2, 2013 10:52 AM

HERO


Quote:

Originally posted by Kwicko:

It'll be a sad day for this country if children can safely attend their classes only under the protection of armed guards.


True, but that day is long past.

The rich, the President, people in inner cities have lived with this for decades. For the poor inner cities it is a sad reflection of the modern world. For the rich it is simply a trapping of their luxury and wealth. For the President it is a necessity.

H

Hero...must be right on all of this. ALL of the rest of us are wrong. Chrisisall, 2012

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
Elections; 2024
Tue, November 5, 2024 16:25 - 4517 posts
What kind of superpower could China be?
Tue, November 5, 2024 16:02 - 54 posts
End of the Democratic Party (not kidding)
Tue, November 5, 2024 14:18 - 56 posts
Disgruntled Tepublicans vow to move to Australia
Tue, November 5, 2024 13:53 - 76 posts
Kamala Harris for President
Tue, November 5, 2024 13:47 - 639 posts
The kids are the ones who will remember...
Tue, November 5, 2024 13:42 - 5 posts
A thread for Democrats Only
Tue, November 5, 2024 13:32 - 6920 posts
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Tue, November 5, 2024 13:15 - 4676 posts
Now we get everything we ever wanted! It's a Celebration!!!!
Tue, November 5, 2024 13:11 - 3 posts
Mid-Term Elections 2022. Hey Jack, I Was Right
Tue, November 5, 2024 13:08 - 412 posts
Oh well
Tue, November 5, 2024 13:06 - 29 posts
Are You- Democrat or Republican
Tue, November 5, 2024 13:04 - 55 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL