REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Best Female College-Level Swimmer in History Continues to be a Man

POSTED BY: 6IXSTRINGJACK
UPDATED: Sunday, March 27, 2022 19:43
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 1130
PAGE 1 of 1

Sunday, February 20, 2022 9:33 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Second Place finish in College-Level Swimming is also a man who likes to play dress up and let his balls slap against his legs in the women's locker room.

Looks like men are going to win all the women's races from now on if you continue to pretend that they aren't men.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10531049/How-trans-swimmer-Li
a-Thomas-intentionally-suppresses-performance-pool.html


In other news, the water that they swim in is wet.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, February 20, 2022 9:41 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Oh...

P.S. The winningest Woman on Jeopardy! in history is this dude.



Keep it up and cry all day long when you can't figure out why you never win any elections anymore, Democrats.



I guaranty you that it will be particularly troubling for you when that day comes after you've been 100% behind censoring and de-platforming people and you're no longer able to speak your mind about anything once the pendulum swings so far the other way we're living in 1984.

I'd love to say that at least you'd reflect and realize that you were the ones who put us there, but you're so lacking in self-awareness that you'll rob me even of that satisfaction, just as the dude's you've got parading around in blouses and high heels have robed the female competitors of their accolades.

--------------------------------------------------

Vaccinated People: "You need to get muh vaccination shots that don't work because I got muh vaccination shots that don't work and I'm afraid of people that didn't get muh vaccination shots that don't work because muh vaccination shots that don't work don't work."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, February 21, 2022 11:01 AM

JONGSSTRAW


That's truly HI-LAR-IOUS! I guess the gals are gonna have to forget about sports competitions and go back to baking cookies and gardening ... not that there's anything wrong with that!

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, February 21, 2022 11:42 AM

JONGSSTRAW


Quote:

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Oh...

P.S. The winningest Woman on Jeopardy! in history is this dude.




He/she reminds me a lot of Alex Karras.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, February 21, 2022 12:59 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Quote:

Originally posted by Jongsstraw:
That's truly HI-LAR-IOUS! I guess the gals are gonna have to forget about sports competitions and go back to baking cookies and gardening ... not that there's anything wrong with that!





--------------------------------------------------

Vaccinated People: "You need to get muh vaccination shots that don't work because I got muh vaccination shots that don't work and I'm afraid of people that didn't get muh vaccination shots that don't work because muh vaccination shots that don't work don't work."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, February 24, 2022 11:20 AM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Massacre As Great White Shark Allowed To Compete In Women's 500 Freestyle

https://babylonbee.com/news/massacre-as-great-white-shark-allowed-to-c
ompete-in-womens-500-freestyle




--------------------------------------------------

Vaccinated People: "You need to get muh vaccination shots that don't work because I got muh vaccination shots that don't work and I'm afraid of people that didn't get muh vaccination shots that don't work because muh vaccination shots that don't work don't work."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, March 19, 2022 11:10 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK


https://www.spiked-online.com/2022/03/18/lia-thomass-victory-is-a-defe
at-for-womens-sport
/

The cognitive dissonance among the hacked brains of the Leftist bots is staggering.

They'll be the first to tell you that gender is a "social construct" and there is no difference between men and women, yet the dude who just won the NCAA Championship in women's swimming was ranked 544th among males when he swam against people of his own gender.

There IS a reason why there are Boys/Girls and Men's/Women's sports. It is because except for a very few rare exceptions, women simply cannot compete against men when it comes to top-tier physical competitions.

Gender is NOT a social construct.

You spent the last two years telling everyone who was hesitant to take the vaccine or allow the economy to be destroyed over Covid to "follow the science", yet we are to deny basic Biology?

If Liberal Democrats continue to let the Leftist hacked-brained lunatics run the party, expect that along with the continued decline in minority votes for the Democrat party they will also see women turn against them as well.


Voice your opinion. Stand up for what is right before it is too late.

Nobody benefits from a one-party government, and the Democrats are going to destroy themselves if they continue to embrace fringe insanity and try to shame the sane into following them off the cliff.



--------------------------------------------------

Me: "Remember Covid?"

Useless Idiots: "What's Covid, durr? Russia, Ukraine, Putin, NATO *drool*. DURRRR!!!!"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, March 20, 2022 2:29 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


I guess this is what comes of insisting that there is NO DIFFERENCE between men and women.

Now, as woman having worked in a man's field for many years, I will say that I've had many competent women working for me (as well as many competent men) and that Ive run across incompetents of both sexes in about equal numbers. There is a huge overlap in bell curves between men and women in terms of height, intelligence, etc. And when you're evaluating someone's ability to do a job, you need to focus on JOB-related skills and performance, and not let bias get in the way.

But when you're dealing with the "elite" ... people at the ends of whatever bell curve you're looking at (strength, lifespan, agility, etc) ... the differences really show up.

When ppl believe their own bullshit, this is what happens.



-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, March 20, 2022 2:47 AM

6IXSTRINGJACK


I mean, yeah. It seems silly to even have to say those truths out loud like you're making an argument for them.

There are plenty of dumbasses out there, both male and female.



Male and Female bodies were made entirely different. Men can't give birth, women can't compete with men in sports.

That's not to say that there aren't plenty of women out there who aren't in fantastic shape and couldn't beat the shit out of plenty of men who are either old, out of shape or beta soy-cucks, but when talking about trained athletes at the top of their game, women just aren't going to be able to compete with men.

I'm not in bad shape myself, but I wouldn't want to get in the ring with any female MMA fighter. Nor would I want to get myself embarrassed by playing against any of the women in the WNBA either. But if any female MMA
fighter were to get in the ring with even the lowest performing male MMA fighter, they're probably risking their life.

We've already saw some dude playing make believe in the MMA and hiding the fact he was crack a woman's skull in a fight.




--------------------------------------------------

Me: "Remember Covid?"

Useless Idiots: "What's Covid, durr? Russia, Ukraine, Putin, NATO *drool*. DURRRR!!!!"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, March 20, 2022 8:04 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
I mean, yeah. It seems silly to even have to say those truths out loud like you're making an argument for them.

There are plenty of dumbasses out there, both male and female.

Male and Female bodies were made entirely different.


Nah ... you can't say that. Men and women are basiclly the same. You COULD say that we are entirely different if women looked like... say, horses ... and men looked like starfish. But we basically share the same anatomy ... bilaterally symmetric hairless apes wuth heads, lungs, livers, gall bladders, etc mostly in the same place and doing basically the same things. Men and women are "variations on a theme". The differences between us aren't universal - there are many women who are taller and stronger and smarter than many men, for example. But when you're talking about the top 1% (or fewer), the bell curve gets pretty thin, and there are fewer examples of overlap.

Bodies aren't "made", they evolve. In many species, the female is larger than the male. It all has to do with the reproductive strategy of that particular species. (Thousands of offspring with no parental attention? Fewer, carfully nurtured offspring? Many females to one male, with the male taking no part in raising the young?) It's a fascinating topic. Anyway, humans are more like many birds: offspring are so demadning that it takes two adults to raise young to their age of reproduction, which means that humans and (most) birds aren't "harem" species. It's a fascinating topic that has to do with energy transfer to the next generation. Humans are aberrant when it comes to apes and even to most other mammals because our young are so helpless for such a prolonger period of time. In no other species (that I know of) do the young have to be hand carried for a year.




-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, March 20, 2022 9:32 AM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Quote:

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
I mean, yeah. It seems silly to even have to say those truths out loud like you're making an argument for them.

There are plenty of dumbasses out there, both male and female.

Male and Female bodies were made entirely different.


Nah ... you can't say that. Men and women are basiclly the same. You COULD say that we are entirely different if women looked like... say, horses ... and men looked like starfish. But we basically share the same anatomy ... bilaterally symmetric hairless apes wuth heads, lungs, livers, gall bladders, etc mostly in the same place and doing basically the same things. Men and women are "variations on a theme". The differences between us aren't universal - there are many women who are taller and stronger and smarter than many men, for example. But when you're talking about the top 1% (or fewer), the bell curve gets pretty thin, and there are fewer examples of overlap.

Bodies aren't "made", they evolve. In many species, the female is larger than the male. It all has to do with the reproductive strategy of that particular species. (Thousands of offspring with no parental attention? Fewer, carfully nurtured offspring? Many females to one male, with the male taking no part in raising the young?) It's a fascinating topic. Anyway, humans are more like many birds: offspring are so demadning that it takes two adults to raise young to their age of reproduction, which means that humans and (most) birds aren't "harem" species. It's a fascinating topic that has to do with energy transfer to the next generation. Humans are aberrant when it comes to apes and even to most other mammals because our young are so helpless for such a prolonger period of time. In no other species (that I know of) do the young have to be hand carried for a year.



It's not 1% or fewer where the differences lie.

If that were the case, there would just be sports and not boys/girls; men's/women's sports.

If you took any random group of 500 men and 500 women and compared the physical strength of the first to the last from the most impressive specimen to the least, you're not going to find too many females stronger than males all the way down the list.

This isn't a shortcoming of women. This is how our species was designed.

If almost any woman wants to be strong, she's going to have to work very hard to get there. And if you put her up against a male who put in as much time building strength, she's never going to compete.



--------------------------------------------------

Me: "Remember Covid?"

Useless Idiots: "What's Covid, durr? Russia, Ukraine, Putin, NATO *drool*. DURRRR!!!!"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, March 22, 2022 9:19 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK


https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/we-should-be-celebrating-lia-tho
mas-we-did-jackie-robinson-ncna1292521


We should be celebrating some mentally ill dude winning at women's sports because I'm mentally ill too. ~Cheryl Cooky

Very appropriate last name, idiot.

Get a real job.

--------------------------------------------------

Me: "Remember Covid?"

Useless Idiots: "What's Covid, durr? Russia, Ukraine, Putin, NATO *drool*. DURRRR!!!!"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, March 22, 2022 11:08 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


It's hard to eyeball, but by height it looks appx 30pct overlap. By strength, there is less overlap bc many men have more muscle mass than many women, even if equal height. But in my prime I could have beat appx 10 pct of men that I knew/ worked with.



Here there is considerable overlap between men and women. I think I've mentioned b4 that avg IQ is about the same, but males are both stupider and smarter, so this is truly a case of comparing the top 1pct.

. Men and w,omen aren't TOTALLY different. Mostly the same, but with variations on a theme.

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, March 23, 2022 12:14 AM

JEWELSTAITEFAN


Quote:

Originally posted by SignyM:
It's hard to eyeball, but by height it looks appx 30pct overlap. By strength, there is less overlap bc many men have more muscle mass than many women, even if equal height. But in my prime I could have beat appx 10 pct of men that I knew/ worked with.



Quote:


Here there is considerable overlap between men and women. I think I've mentioned b4 that avg IQ is about the same, but males are both stupider and smarter, so this is truly a case of comparing the top 1pct.


Quote:

Men and w,omen aren't TOTALLY different. Mostly the same, but with variations on a theme.

I'm not sure I understand what you are trying to say.
Regarding muscles, saying females have less muscle mass is generally accurate, but can be confusing particularly when used as a supporting or causal factor in another statement.
Excluding males who are Juice Monkeys, musclebound bodybuilders, bulk workout gymrats (the peak competitors mentioned in this thread are working out for strength & endurance rather than bulk); if a female and a male can move the same weight, for example in Bench Press, the male will have bulkier pecs than the female. The female will have more compact, or more toned muscle in that group - and IIRC less mass as well.
So if a male and female are the same size, and perhaps same weight, then the female will normally have greater raw strength.

Regarding psychometry, I recall a variation between genders in terms of "left brain" and "right brain" measurements and SDs. Or perhaps expressed as "science IQ" (masculine tending) vs. "arts IQ" (feminine, including gays). But this could be old data, perhaps no longer applicable in females achieving majority in the last 15 years. Females had been found to subvert their science/math talents during puberty to emulate their role models - who were women Public School Teachers who knew nothing of math and science.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, March 23, 2022 1:54 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Could be true. I remember watching a video about a 12-y/o girl who could press a phenomenal amount. And yet, she looked like ... a skinny 12-y/o girl.

AFA left-brain/right-brain, it's true that I worked with a self-selected population, but I was, and knew, a helluva lot of very mechanically-minded women in the lab.

There was one instrument that just wasn't working right, and staff just wasn't "getting it", so one Saturday when I had to be in the lab to accompany one of the chemists who was running an emergency sample, I went in with my schematics and tools and tore the whole thing apart, changed out all of the plumbing and mode of detection (from a TCD to a Ni reducer/FID) and had the whole thing up and singing in six hours. I regularly modified instruments and whipped together/ validated new methods. (I think that's why I was so good at evaluating data; I knew all the pitfalls.)

Was a pretty decent programmer too... the only thing that defeated my programming was my shitty memory: I had a terrible time remembering all of the commands and conventions (use a semi-colon, not a comma! Or was that the other way around?) If it hadn't been for that, I might have programmed instead. (I sucked at learning German and French, too. Languages ... not my thing.)

There were women there, and men, who were even better than I was. And there were women, and men, who were much worse. Had nothing to do with age, either. There were older people who were very sharp to contemplate new ideas, and young people who were pretty stick-in-the-mud.

Just as an aside, the WORST people, on average, were people who had Master's degrees. They were very book-bound and tied to received wisdom, but didn't seem to have an exploratory frame of mind.

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, March 27, 2022 10:38 AM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Quote:

Originally posted by SignyM:
It's hard to eyeball, but by height it looks appx 30pct overlap. By strength, there is less overlap bc many men have more muscle mass than many women, even if equal height. But in my prime I could have beat appx 10 pct of men that I knew/ worked with.



We're not arguing here.

I didn't say that ALL men were stronger than ALL women.

I've personally never met one who was stronger than I am, but I did spend 4 years in my twenties power lifting and eating 7,000 calories a day until I was a 5' 7" dude who weighted 220 lbs and had to walk sideways through doorways. I've lost a lot of that muscle mass in 20 years, but I still greatly benefit from that work all these years later. (And obviously, that being said, though there haven't been any stronger than me, there have been many women in my life who were taller than I am. And I did lose a lot of my speed from my youth when I did the power lifting, so add that to my old age and bad decisions and I'm sure there are plenty of women I've known who could beat me in any race that's longer than about 20 meters).

But I still would never get in the ring with even the worst MMA fighter who would wipe the floor with my ass. Even though she's the worst performer there, she still trains regularly, benefits from years of developing fighting skills that I don't possess, is probably 20 years younger than I am, and almost certainly doesn't smoke or have a 5 year period of getting blackout drunk every other day in her past.

And in the case of the WNBA you could just ignore physicality altogether because of my extreme height disadvantage, coupled with the fact that I've never even played the game on a team and have any skills. I'm a good shot when just shooting around, but I'd have that ball slammed right back in my face any time I shot since I'm not skilled at moving the ball around and making openings for myself. I think getting on the court against WNBA players would end up being far more embarrassing than getting my face stomped in MMA would be.

Your graph is saying what I said.

If you took the top performing male and female specimens and went all the way down the 3.5 Billion line and compared the next two on repeat all the way down to the most pathetic male and female specimens on the planet, the man is always going to be physically more capable than the woman.



--------------------------------------------------

Me: "Remember Covid?"

Useless Idiots: "What's Covid, durr? Russia, Ukraine, Putin, NATO *drool*. DURRRR!!!!"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, March 27, 2022 7:43 PM

JEWELSTAITEFAN


I was thinking Language was the opposite side of the brain from math/science.

Which is why I was so surprised that I scored so high on Aptitude for Language. And the test was administered next to the airport with massive aircraft taking off - and it was July/August in San Diego, so of course the windows were open. Kinda glad that aptitude didn't derail my career trajectory. Maybe that was why the Officers tried so hard to lure me to OCS/NAPS.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
BUILD BACK BETTER!
Fri, March 29, 2024 09:26 - 12 posts
Well... He was no longer useful to the DNC or the Ukraine Money Laundering Scheme... So justice was served
Fri, March 29, 2024 09:13 - 3 posts
Elections; 2024
Fri, March 29, 2024 06:56 - 2076 posts
Russia Invades Ukraine. Again
Fri, March 29, 2024 06:20 - 6156 posts
Russia says 60 dead, 145 injured in concert hall raid; Islamic State group claims responsibility
Fri, March 29, 2024 06:18 - 57 posts
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Fri, March 29, 2024 02:54 - 3414 posts
Long List of Celebrities that are Still Here
Fri, March 29, 2024 00:00 - 1 posts
China
Thu, March 28, 2024 22:10 - 447 posts
Biden
Thu, March 28, 2024 22:03 - 853 posts
Salon: NBC's Ronna blunder: A failed attempt to appeal to MAGA voters — except they hate her too
Thu, March 28, 2024 07:04 - 1 posts
Russian losses in Ukraine
Wed, March 27, 2024 23:21 - 987 posts
human actions, global climate change, global human solutions
Wed, March 27, 2024 15:03 - 824 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL