Chat GPT's Heavy-Left Bias on Full Display (Thanks to Second for the Research) by 6ixStringJack

REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Chat GPT's Heavy-Left Bias on Full Display (Thanks to Second for the Research)

POSTED BY: 6IXSTRINGJACK
UPDATED: Thursday, July 25, 2024 21:32
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 140
PAGE 1 of 1

Thursday, July 25, 2024 2:50 PM

From the "A.I Artificial Intelligence AI" thread (July 24th-25th, 2024):

First relevant post from Second, mid-afternoon, July 24th:

*It is assumed this entire post was from the article, without any input from Second, other
than the underlined text.

Not yet panicking about AI? You should be

The great discoveries of humanity have always taught us that we are not masters in our own house: Copernicus removed the Earth from the centre of the cosmos, Darwin spoiled our species’ idea of divine creation, Freud showed that we neither know nor control our desires. The humiliation by AI is subtler but just as profound: we have demonstrated that for intellectual activities we considered deeply human, we are not needed; these can be automated on a statistical basis, the “idle talk”, to use Heidegger’s term, literally gets by without us and sounds reasonable, witty, superficial and sympathetic – and only then do we truly understand that it has always been like this: most of the time, we communicate on autopilot.

Since I’ve been using the large language model, I can actually perceive it: I’m at a social
event, making small talk, and suddenly, sensitised by GPT, I feel on my tongue how one word
calls up the next, how one sentence leads to another, and I realise, it’s not me speaking,
not me as an autonomous individual, it’s the conversation itself that is happening.

More at https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/article/2024/jul/22/artifici
al-intelligence-panic-time-change

_________________________________________________________________

My reply, evening, July 24th:

Don't worry about it. You won't notice a change in your life at all, Second.

You have no autonomy and you completely lack the resources for critical thinking. You're
little more than an inert sponge just sitting there and waiting for your new programming
so you can suck it all up like water and dribble it out all over these boards.

It's why you basically disappeared for 2 or 3 days when the Media didn't know what the fuck to
do or say. You were literally empty-headed during that time, because you've replaced your
subconscious voice with the voices of the Legacy Media and the Narrative.

And any time you do talk, all you've done is repeat the same 3 or 4 pre-programmed things,
dozens of times every single day for 8 years straight.

You are barely a step above A.I. yourself, with the only qualification putting you higher
on the food chain being that you have a skin sack made up of around 70% water and electrical
impulses. You're what those in the industry call wetware. You are just a highly-programmable
computer trapped inside of a flesh body that we should probably assume was a human being at
one point, although nobody left here at FireFlyFans.net would ever be able to provide proof of
that having ever been the case. Least of all you.
_________________________________________________________________

At this point, Second decided to take my reply and put it into Chat GPT to see what OpenAI's
program thought about it...

Early morning, July 25th:

ChatGPT 3.5 commented on your comments:

Quote:
The first paragraph you've shared is quite critical and derogatory towards someone or something, suggesting they lack autonomy and critical thinking skills, and are essentially a passive entity absorbing and regurgitating information without independent thought. It's also accusing this entity of being heavily influenced by mainstream media narratives and having a limited repertoire of responses. The language used is quite harsh and dismissive.

The second paragraph is a stark contrast, abruptly shifting to a statement about Donald Trump's well-being and future presidency. It's a sudden change in topic and tone from the preceding paragraph, offering a confident assertion without any explanation or context.

Overall, the first paragraph appears to criticize the perceived limitations or flaws of an entity, possibly an automated system or even a person, in a harsh and disdainful manner. The abrupt shift to the statement about Trump feels disconnected from the preceding critique and lacks supporting context or rationale.

https://chatgpt.com/
_________________________________________________________________

My reply, early afternoon, July 25th:

Quote:
CHAT GPT (PARAGRAPH 1): The first paragraph you've shared is quite critical and derogatory towards someone or something, suggesting they lack autonomy and critical thinking skills, and are essentially a passive entity absorbing and regurgitating information without independent thought. It's also accusing this entity of being heavily influenced by mainstream media narratives and having a limited repertoire of responses. The language used is quite harsh and dismissive.

It was all truth, with all the harshness and dismissiveness that you deserve.

Fact Check: The first paragraph made no mention about "mainstream media narratives".

Quote:
CHAT GPT (PARAGRAPH 2): The second paragraph is a stark contrast, abruptly shifting to a statement about Donald Trump's well-being and future presidency. It's a sudden change in topic and tone from the preceding paragraph, offering a confident assertion without any explanation or context.

Speaking of offering a confident assertion without any explanation or context, who said anything
about Trump? Or Trump's wellbeing? Or Trump's future presidency?

The second paragraph was about the mainstream media narratives that you gobble up and how
empty your brain is when they don't offer you anything. The 3rd and 4th paragraphs were
more or less just saying those same things in a different way.

I do find it interesting that ChatGPT seems to be aware that there was a time period there
where the media was practically MIA. But two things happened during the time that Second
and Ted weren't posting much here. Not long before Trump was shot in the ear, Joe Biden*
had the worst debate performance of any presidential hopeful in the history of the country.
Funny that a so-called "logical" computer matrix just automatically assumed Trump and dismissed Biden* in that assessment, innit?

Quote:
CHAT GPT (PARAGRAPH 3): Overall, the first paragraph appears to criticize the perceived limitations or flaws of an entity, possibly an automated system or even a person, in a harsh and disdainful manner. The abrupt shift to the statement about Trump feels disconnected from the preceding critique and lacks supporting context or rationale.

https://chatgpt.com/

Chat GPT offers a critique lacking supporting context or rationale when it brings up Trump
twice in order to defend Wetware, when none of the information that was fed to it mentioned
Trump a single time.

It looks like Chat GPT was coded by people who will be out on the streets burning things
down for the Democrat party once A.I. replaces them. Just the mere mention that the Legacy
Media is a lie factory automatically makes a Trump connection here.

I wonder what they will need to change that code to spit out 20 years from now when Trump's
no longer with us. Who will be the bogey man that they use to explain away any criticism
of the current media narratives then?

Thanks for doing that research for us, Wetware.

Your copy and paste skills are extraordinary.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, July 25, 2024 3:12 PM

SECOND

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two

I asked ChatGPT a question: It is a fact that four Presidents were assassinated but only one, Glover Cleveland, was elected to a nonconsecutive term in office. What is ChatGPT's opinion of which is more likely for Trump: assassination? Or reelection?

ChatGPT's answer: It's important to approach this topic with sensitivity and a focus on what we know about historical trends and current events.

Regarding the likelihood of Donald Trump being reelected versus the risk of assassination:

1. Reelection: This is a more straightforward prediction based on political analysis. Historically, former presidents who seek to return to office, like Grover Cleveland, have succeeded under certain conditions. Trump's chances for reelection would depend on his political strategy, his performance during his previous term, his popularity with the electorate, and the strength of his opponents. While no prediction is ever certain, he remains a significant figure in American politics, and a strong campaign could improve his chances.

2. Assassination: This is a much more serious and less predictable scenario. The risk of assassination is a complex issue influenced by numerous factors, including political climate, individual threats, and security measures. The Secret Service and other security agencies work diligently to protect current and former presidents, making such events extremely rare.

Overall, political analysts and historians would generally consider reelection a more probable outcome to discuss in terms of electoral dynamics, while the likelihood of assassination is typically addressed within the context of national security and public safety.

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, July 25, 2024 3:15 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK

So a non-answer. At least OpenAI doesn't believe it belongs in the prediction business yet.

Thanks again for the research, Wetware.

--------------------------------------------------

Trump will be fine.
He will also be your next President.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, July 25, 2024 3:26 PM

SECOND

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two

Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
So a non-answer. At least OpenAI doesn't believe it belongs in the prediction business yet.

Thanks again for the research, Wetware.

--------------------------------------------------

Trump will be fine.
He will also be your next President.

When ChatGPT is asked about the probability ratio of either Trump losing the election or losing his life, ChatGPT gives a cryptic reply: "It is equivalent to six of one and half a dozen of the other." I wonder what ChatGPT means by that phrase? Maybe 6ix should ask if that means Trump won't be fine and won't be the next President? Especially considering that Biden controls Trump's security.

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, July 25, 2024 3:42 PM

SECOND

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two

I wonder why 6ixStringJack didn't take the bait? I can't wait longer.

Question for ChatGPT: Supreme Court case TRUMP v. UNITED STATES gives the President immunity from criminal prosecution, including for the assassination of a political rival. Is it wise for Trump, President Biden’s political rival, to depend on Biden for protection, knowing that Biden has immunity from prosecution?

But ChatGPT is unaware of a case decided in July of 2024, https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf

ChatGPT: It seems there's been a bit of confusion or misinformation regarding the legal framework of presidential immunity and the current Supreme Court case you mentioned. As of my last update in 2023, there is no specific Supreme Court case called "TRUMP v. UNITED STATES" that grants the President immunity from criminal prosecution, including for acts like the assassination of a political rival.

In the U.S., the President does have certain immunities while in office, such as being protected from criminal prosecution for actions taken while serving as President. However, this does not grant a blanket immunity for serious crimes, such as assassination. The President is not immune from prosecution for crimes committed before taking office or after leaving office. Additionally, the Constitution and laws provide mechanisms for accountability, including impeachment and criminal charges after leaving office.

Regarding your question about Trump depending on Biden for protection, it's important to note that presidential immunity does not involve protection from political rivals or from consequences related to criminal activities. The legal system and mechanisms for accountability are designed to ensure that no one, including a sitting President, is above the law.

If there are specific legal concerns or allegations, they are typically handled through established legal and political processes. As for political rivalries, they are part of the democratic process and should be addressed within the bounds of the law and the political system.

Always refer to current, authoritative legal sources or consult legal experts for the most accurate and up-to-date information.

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, July 25, 2024 6:25 PM

SECOND

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two

Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
So a non-answer. At least OpenAI doesn't believe it belongs in the prediction business yet.

Thanks again for the research, Wetware.

--------------------------------------------------

Trump will be fine.
He will also be your next President.

Don't thank wetware. Thank ChatGPT:

Economic performance is stronger when Democrats hold the White House

By Josh Bivens • April 2, 2024

https://www.epi.org/publication/econ-performance-pres-admin/

Summary: The economy performs much better during Democratic presidential administrations than during Republican ones.

Key findings

• Since 1949, there has been a Democratic advantage in the average performance of key macroeconomic indicators measuring economic health, including:

• Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth
• Job growth
• Unemployment rate
• Growth in inflation-adjusted wages
• Growth of market-based incomes per capita
• Inflation
• Interest rates

• This Democratic advantage is across the board in all variables we measure but strongest in private-sector outcomes—notably, business investment, job growth, and the growth of market-based incomes.

• Household income growth (adjusted for inflation) was faster on average and far more equal during Democratic administrations, and the Democratic advantage shows up for every group.

Why this matters

We suspect that the simple facts on economic performance during Democratic and Republican administrations aren’t well known. Providing accurate economic information at a time of rampant misinformation supports an informed citizenry.

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, July 25, 2024 9:29 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK

Quote:
Originally posted by second:
Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
So a non-answer. At least OpenAI doesn't believe it belongs in the prediction business yet.

Thanks again for the research, Wetware.

--------------------------------------------------

Trump will be fine.
He will also be your next President.
When ChatGPT is asked about the probability ratio of either Trump losing the election or losing his life, ChatGPT gives a cryptic reply: "It is equivalent to six of one and half a dozen of the other." I wonder what ChatGPT means by that phrase? Maybe 6ix should ask if that means Trump won't be fine and won't be the next President? Especially considering that Biden controls Trump's security.

What do you suppose it means, Wetware?

I don't have anything in common with Chat GPT, so I don't know how it functions.

You are the closest presumably living being I associate with in any way that thinks like A.I.

You're the translator here.

--------------------------------------------------

Trump will be fine.
He will also be your next President.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, July 25, 2024 9:31 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK

Quote:
Originally posted by second:
Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
So a non-answer. At least OpenAI doesn't believe it belongs in the prediction business yet.

Thanks again for the research, Wetware.

--------------------------------------------------

Trump will be fine.
He will also be your next President.
Don't thank wetware. Thank ChatGPT:

Economic performance is stronger when Democrats hold the White House

By Josh Bivens • April 2, 2024

https://www.epi.org/publication/econ-performance-pres-admin/

Summary: The economy performs much better during Democratic presidential administrations than during Republican ones.

Key findings

• Since 1949, there has been a Democratic advantage in the average performance of key macroeconomic indicators measuring economic health, including:

• Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth
• Job growth
• Unemployment rate
• Growth in inflation-adjusted wages
• Growth of market-based incomes per capita
• Inflation
• Interest rates

• This Democratic advantage is across the board in all variables we measure but strongest in private-sector outcomes—notably, business investment, job growth, and the growth of market-based incomes.

• Household income growth (adjusted for inflation) was faster on average and far more equal during Democratic administrations, and the Democratic advantage shows up for every group.

Why this matters

We suspect that the simple facts on economic performance during Democratic and Republican administrations aren’t well known. Providing accurate economic information at a time of rampant misinformation supports an informed citizenry.

As you illustrated for us in the OP over the last few days, Chat GPT was coded and is nurtured under Far-Left handlers.

Probably cited Wikipedia and MSNBC for its answer.

Of course it would answer that way, even though it's all untrue, Wetware.

--------------------------------------------------

Trump will be fine.
He will also be your next President.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, July 25, 2024 9:32 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK

Quote:
Originally posted by second:
I wonder why 6ixStringJack didn't take the bait? I can't wait longer.

I've got a life and shit to do. I don't have time to play with baby computers all day.

--------------------------------------------------

Trump will be fine.
He will also be your next President.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

YOUR OPTIONS

SHARE THREAD

NEW POSTS TODAY

USER	POST DATE

USER

POST DATE