Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
Wow. That's a hilarious spin. . . . that's just amusing to us.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
Wow. That's a hilarious spin. . . . that's just amusing to us.

---

The corporations are not amused that the Republicans are changing election laws to win elections for themselves.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
Wow. That's a hilarious spin. . . . that's just amusing to us.

---

The corporations are not amused that the Republicans are changing reinforcing, strengthening, securing election laws to win elections for themselves Legitimate American Citizens.

---

It's the Democrats who changed election laws before November of 2020, and are trying their damnedest to do so before they lose power in the mid-terms.

You are so full of shit. As always.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:

The Big Lie - If voter fraud is an epidemic, why can't Texas find it?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
Unsolicited mail-in ballots are fraud.

Biden* pulled from way behind and won* every one of those states with a razor thin margin days and sometimes weeks after the election should have been over. Pipes magically burst and cleared everyone out, and all sorts of shenanigans occurred.

In-person with Photo ID for everyone except for military and those on hospice, or our elections have the integrity of a Banana Republic.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
Unsolicited mail-in ballots are fraud.

Biden* pulled from way behind and won* every one of those states with a razor thin margin days and sometimes weeks after the election should have been over. Pipes magically burst and cleared everyone out, and all sorts of shenanigans occurred.

In-person with Photo ID for everyone except for military and those on hospice, or our elections have the integrity of a Banana Republic.

---

6ix, while you're creating new rules...

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:

Not new. The way it always was done before Democrats destroyed the election process.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Why are you posting about Texas, SECODRATE? Isn't this thread about HR1? Which, as far as I can tell, is simply a DNC powergrab to make their one-party rule permanent?

Stick to the topic, because you're famous for conflating one event with another.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
Nah, Second. That's just more of your media buddies and their agenda.

They have no respect for history and want to tear it down and rebuild it.

---

Quote:

---

SIGNYM:
Why are you posting about Texas, SECODRATE? Isn't this thread about HR1? Which, as far as I can tell, is simply a DNC powergrab to make their one-party rule permanent?

Stick to the topic, because you're famous for conflating one event with another.

SECONDRATE: HR-1 would over-ride Texas voting laws. You obviously misunderstood the point that Texas voting laws since the Civil War were at first designed to keep Republicans (who just so happen to be black) out of power. ... blah blah blah

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:

Quote:

---

SIGNYM:
Why are you posting about Texas, SECODRATE? Isn't this thread about HR1? Which, as far as I can tell, is simply a DNC powergrab to make their one-party rule permanent?

Stick to the topic, because you're famous for conflating one event with another.

SECONDRATE: HR-1 would over-ride Texas voting laws. You obviously misunderstood the point that Texas voting laws since the Civil War were at first designed to keep Republicans (who just so happen to be black) out of power. ... blah blah blah

---

And HR1 is OBVIOUSLY designed to keep the DNC in power.

Why replace one set of laws with another that's worse, bc it's national?

So, can you come up with a solution to the problems that you see without creating something worse, and without violating the Constitition a national procedure?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by sloppyseconds:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
Unsolicited mail-in ballots are fraud.

Biden* pulled from way behind and won* every one of those states with a razor thin margin days and sometimes weeks after the election should have been over. Pipes magically burst and cleared everyone out, and all sorts of shenanigans occurred.

In-person with Photo ID for everyone except for military and those on hospice, or our elections have the integrity of a Banana Republic.

---

6ix, while you're creating new rules, require proof voters and candidates paid taxes. Non-payment means non-voting. Why should worthless scumbags who don't pay taxes and/or cheat, like you and Trump, have any say in how taxes are spent?

A lot of tax-cheating scumbags are running for office and/or voting:

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted:
The Big Lie -

That’s not a typo. It’s not 174,000 or 17,400 or even 1,740. It’s 174 little ol’ Texas souls.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
There's widespread evidence of voter fraud in every state that sent out unsolicited mail-in ballots that needed no picture ID to vote.

Every one.

That the Legacy Media lies to you about that fact and you choose to believe it is on you.


You'll figure it out one day when that system is used to steal elections from somebody you wanted to win.

I've lived long enough to see how wildly the tides turn and alliances change. You should know better, old man.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted:
Trump claimed today a win for himself in New Hampshire. He is waiting for the "great Patriots of Windham, New Hampshire" to prove he won. It just so happens that Windham is NOT looking at the Presidential election. Trump is deliberately lying about the election audit. He writes:

Donald J. Trump, 9:48am May 6, 2021

Congratulations to the great Patriots of Windham, New Hampshire for their incredible fight to seek out the truth on the massive Election Fraud which took place in New Hampshire and the 2020 Presidential Election. The spirit for transparency and justice is being displayed all over the Country by media outlets which do not represent Fake News. People are watching in droves as these Patriots work tirelessly to reveal the real facts of the most tainted and corrupt Election in American history. Congratulations Windham—look forward to seeing the results.
https://www.donaldjtrump.com/desk/desk-dqvrd5gscw/

How do I know Trump is lying? Initially, the audit was only going to focus on the Windham state representative results. But the final plan calls for an audit of Windham’s votes for governor and U.S. senator, as well. THERE IS NO AUDIT ON TRUMP'S ELECTION.

While there’s no evidence of fraud or tampering in Windham’s election, conspiracy theorists trying to sow doubt in the legitimacy of the 2020 presidential election have latched onto this local legislative race as evidence that the election was compromised in some way. That’s despite a lack of evidence that the issue in Windham is in any way systemic. Right-wing websites and commentators, including some with close ties to former President Trump, have been drumming up outrage over Windham and the process surrounding the audit in recent weeks.
https://www.nhpr.org/post/whats-happening-windhams-election-audit

Trump lost in New Hampshire by
424,921 Biden
365,654 Trump
59,267 Difference

---

Quote:

---

Some people want to find out if there was an issue with the ballot-counting devices used in Windham, especially since those same aging devices are used statewide.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

Their lies are quite predictable.

Once it was "there has never, ever, ever been a single instance of Voting Fraud or Election Theft"

Then is was "we would never, ever commit a single instance of Voting Fraud"

Then "The Voting Fraud we are obviously committing won't be enough to alter the Election"

Then "We will win, so it doesn't matter how much Voting Fraud we perpetrate"

Then "You cannot prove that we perpetrated Voting Fraud and Election Theft when we committed Voting Fraud and Election Theft"

Then "OK, so it is obvious that we committed Voting Fraud and Election Theft, but you cannot prove that it would matter"

Just moving around the goalposts.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
All 4 of the Republicans had 300 votes subtracted from the town's legitimate votes (total of 1,200 votes taken from the legitimate Republican votes), and the Democrap had an extra 100 votes added to her tally - and that is the "official results"

Quote:

---

Some people want to find out if there was an issue with the ballot-counting devices used in Windham, especially since those same aging devices are used statewide.

---

This same discrepancy would equal via extrapolation, in the Democrap (Biden) column, an actual vote of about 414,000 - and in the Republican (Trump) column, an actual vote tally of about 450,000. Meaning Trump won new Hampshire.

Sory that your Fake Libtard Maths didn't work out for you.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
All 4 of the Republicans had 300 votes subtracted from the town's legitimate votes (total of 1,200 votes taken from the legitimate Republican votes), and the Democrap had an extra 100 votes added to her tally - and that is the "official results"

Quote:

---

Some people want to find out if there was an issue with the ballot-counting devices used in Windham, especially since those same aging devices are used statewide.

---

This same discrepancy would equal via extrapolation, in the Democrap (Biden) column, an actual vote of about 414,000 - and in the Republican (Trump) column, an actual vote tally of about 450,000. Meaning Trump won new Hampshire.

Sorry that your Fake Libtard Maths didn't work out for you.

---

Sorry to correct you, but you got the sign of the numbers backwards: https://datawrapper.dwcdn.net/DqPHZ/5/

I suspect you will look at the graph and convince yourself you got it right, but you got the pluses and the minuses wrong despite your supersized self-confidence.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
There's widespread evidence of voter fraud in every state that sent out unsolicited mail-in ballots that needed no picture ID to vote.

Every one.

That the Legacy Media lies to you about that fact and you choose to believe it is on you.


You'll figure it out one day when that system is used to steal elections from somebody you wanted to win.

I've lived long enough to see how wildly the tides turn and alliances change. You should know better, old man.

---

Their lies are quite predictable.

Once it was "there has never, ever, ever been a single instance of Voting Fraud or Election Theft"

Then is was "we would never, ever commit a single instance of Voting Fraud"

Then "The Voting Fraud we are obviously committing won't be enough to alter the Election"

Then "We will win, so it doesn't matter how much Voting Fraud we perpetrate"

Then "You cannot prove that we perpetrated Voting Fraud and Election Theft when we committed Voting Fraud and Election Theft"

Then "OK, so it is obvious that we committed Voting Fraud and Election Theft, but you cannot prove that it would matter"

Just moving around the goalposts.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

Quote:

---

Originally posted:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
All 4 of the Republicans had 300 votes subtracted from the town's legitimate votes (total of 1,200 votes taken from the legitimate Republican votes), and the Democrap had an extra 100 votes added to her tally - and that is the "official results"

Quote:

---

Some people want to find out if there was an issue with the ballot-counting devices used in Windham, especially since those same aging devices are used statewide.

---

This same discrepancy would equal via extrapolation, in the Democrap (Biden) column, an actual vote of about 414,000 - and in the Republican (Trump) column, an actual vote tally of about 450,000. Meaning Trump won new Hampshire.

Sory that your Fake Libtard Maths didn't work out for you.

---

Sorry to correct you, but you got the sign of the numbers backwards: https://datawrapper.dwcdn.net/DqPHZ/5/

I suspect you will look at the graph and convince yourself you got it right, but you got the pluses and the minuses wrong despite your supersized self-confidence.

---

How insipid are you?

For the Republicans, the actual vote totals (revealed in the recount/audit) returned 300 votes to each of the Republicans which had mysteriously been deleted from the Election Night official counts - and the actual vote totals exposed the 100 fake votes added to the Election Night Democrap tally.

[img] https://datawrapper.dwcdn.net/DqPHZ/5/[/img]

---

Quote:

---

In a country with such recent history of political violence, imagine how much worse things would be if the donors to every cause had to consider what their opponents might do to them when their support was made public? Imagine how many people would be shamed and silenced, and how many more would silence themselves. Imagine how much harder it would be to find consensus, tackle America’s biggest challenges, and move the country forward. If this happens in 2021, there’s no telling how much progress we’ll be missing in years to come.

---

Quote:

---

the V-Dem Institute at the University of Gothenburg in Sweden released data last year aggregating political scientists’ measures of the democratic commitment of political parties around the world. As the chart below shows, in the U.S., the GOP has moved entirely in the wrong direction over the past half century.

---

Quote:

---

Originally bot posted:

https://jabberwocking.com/chart-of-the-day-fox-news-republicans-and-th
e-destruction-of-democracy/

---

Quote:

---

Originally bot posted:
Republicans in the Texas Senate muscled one of the most restrictive Security restorative voting measures in the US to the cusp of law on Sunday, after rushing the legislation to the floor in the middle of the night.

The sweeping measure, Senate Bill 7 or SB7, passed on party lines around 6am, after eight hours of questioning by Democrats who have virtually no path to stop it. The bill must still clear a final vote in the Texas House later on Sunday in order to reach Governor Greg Abbott, who is expected to sign it.

Michael McCaul, a senior US House Republican, told CNN he thought the law in his native Texas “may be more of an optics issue, restoring confidence with with the American people. In my state you actually do believe that there was tremendous fraud.”

Texas has a pending case of possible voter fraud arising from the 2020 election.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
The fraud mail-in election was fraud.

No election is legitimate until there is voter ID required for every single vote counted.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
FIFY

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
The fraud mail-in election was fraud.

No election is legitimate until there is voter ID required for every single vote counted.

---

I've voted by mail, let's see, since I was working in Saudi Arabia. I'd say your refusal to accept mail-in votes is an unacceptable limitation.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:

Quote:

---

Originally bot posted:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
The fraud mail-in election was fraud.

No election is legitimate until there is voter ID required for every single vote counted.

---

I've voted by mail, let's see, since I was working in Saudi Arabia. I'd say your refusal to accept mail-in votes is an unacceptable limitation.

---

Do not attempt to conflate absentee ballots with unsolicited mail-in fraud ballots.

I'm not an idiot like your fellow Democrat voters.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
"Stymie" in this case referring to the hindrance of the inevitable and rational process rather than the prevention of said inevitable and rational process.

That's the problem with using big words, CNN. Most of your audience doesn't actually know the definitions of words and aren't even aware of the fact that many words have more than one.

---