Sign Up | Log In
REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS
About that "50% Pay No Taxes" Myth
Friday, October 7, 2011 2:37 AM
GEEZER
Keep the Shiny side up
Quote:Originally posted by m52nickerson: Guess what, they live here that mean they pay for those things regardless if they use them.
Friday, October 7, 2011 2:46 AM
M52NICKERSON
DALEK!
Quote:Originally posted by Geezer: Quote:Originally posted by m52nickerson: Guess what, they live here that mean they pay for those things regardless if they use them. That was my point. They pay taxes to support services they never use. So should they get a rebate? "Keep the Shiny side up"
Friday, October 7, 2011 3:12 AM
AURAPTOR
America loves a winner!
Quote:Originally posted by Kwicko: Niki, Six's basic philosophy is pretty much in line with Rappy's. "I got mine; FUCK YOU!" Oh, and if you get sick, then fuck you in both ears. If you get blown up by terrorists, you clearly made the wrong choices in life. If they see someone starving to death, their "solution" is to tease that person with a sandwich. If they see a sick person, they'll laugh at that person for being weak. I'm actually surprised they both don't go out and celebrate 9/11 every year as that day when the government got downsized by a bunch of foreigners.
Friday, October 7, 2011 9:47 AM
NIKI2
Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...
Quote: Niki, Six's basic philosophy is pretty much in line with Rappy's. "I got mine; FUCK YOU!"
Friday, October 7, 2011 11:00 AM
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: Quote:Originally posted by Kwicko: Niki, Six's basic philosophy is pretty much in line with Rappy's. "I got mine; FUCK YOU!" Oh, and if you get sick, then fuck you in both ears. If you get blown up by terrorists, you clearly made the wrong choices in life. If they see someone starving to death, their "solution" is to tease that person with a sandwich. If they see a sick person, they'll laugh at that person for being weak. I'm actually surprised they both don't go out and celebrate 9/11 every year as that day when the government got downsized by a bunch of foreigners. Odd how I got tossed into the mix here. Nothing of what you claim has any semblance of my positions. " I got mine... ". Well, yes, I do have mine. I worked for it, ergo, it is mine, to do with as I see fit. Sames goes for you, and everyone else. Not real sure how that's an issue, for anyone. If you get sick, same as if I get sick. Neither one of us are DUE a portion of someone else's life, simply because it makes someone else feel good about themselves. But feel free to OFFER what you'd like, I have no issues w/ that. It's just that when it's taken , at the point of a gun, that I then have an issue.
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor:Nothing of what you claim has any semblance of my positions. " I got mine... ". Well, yes, I do have mine. I worked for it, ergo, it is mine, to do with as I see fit. Sames goes for you, and everyone else. Not real sure how that's an issue, for anyone.
Friday, October 7, 2011 11:09 AM
1KIKI
Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.
Friday, October 7, 2011 11:17 AM
Friday, October 7, 2011 12:56 PM
6IXSTRINGJACK
Quote:Originally posted by Kwicko: Niki, Six's basic philosophy is pretty much in line with Rappy's. "I got mine; FUCK YOU!" Oh, and if you get sick, then fuck you in both ears. If you get blown up by terrorists, you clearly made the wrong choices in life. If they see someone starving to death, their "solution" is to tease that person with a sandwich. If they see a sick person, they'll laugh at that person for being weak.
Quote:Originally posted by Niki2: What 6ix doesn't get, also, is that I'm not "bitching" and there's no "stress". I speak up for things because I believe in them. My fellow humans are my brothers and sisters; if it's in my power to help, I will, and I get far more in return. I'm disgusted by the bullshit that they are freeloaders and bums, I KNOW that "but for fortune" I could have ended up in their place, and while we don't have much, we get by, for which I'm GRATEFUL, not snotty. The idea that taxes are taken "at the point of a gun" is so assinine it makes me sneer; we are one country, and the Founding Fathers intended for the government to be responsible in part for the WELFARE OF ALL. Raptor, 6ix, Wulf, Geezer, would seemingly be quite happy in Ayn Rand's world, but I don't think it would be quite what they think it would, and they're all paupers in their way far more than we are or ever could be.
Friday, October 7, 2011 1:44 PM
KWICKO
"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)
Quote:Originally posted by Geezer: Quote:Originally posted by m52nickerson: So 0.016% of the US taxpayers made at least 1% of the total money. Yes. And pay 9% of the total Federal Individual Income taxes on it. And come to think of it, there's probably a lot of tax-supported expense these folks don't incur. Although they pay taxes that support public schools, I doubt too many of them send their kids there.
Quote:Originally posted by m52nickerson: So 0.016% of the US taxpayers made at least 1% of the total money.
Quote: Bet they don't used tax-subsidized public transportation much.
Quote: Doubt that they file many Medicare claims.
Quote: Due to their use of limos, they probably pay more in gasoline taxes than most folks.
Friday, October 7, 2011 1:53 PM
Quote:This means that if my brother, who suffered an aneurysm, brain hemorrhage, and several strokes at six years old and was told he'd never walk or talk again (but did!) will probably have to wait about 2 years before he receives any benefits because Uncle Sam has to sift through all the bullshit claims before getting to him.
Friday, October 7, 2011 2:12 PM
Quote:Originally posted by m52nickerson: No you don't owe any single person anything, you and everyone else owes society.
Friday, October 7, 2011 2:27 PM
Quote:Originally posted by Kwicko: Quote:This means that if my brother, who suffered an aneurysm, brain hemorrhage, and several strokes at six years old and was told he'd never walk or talk again (but did!) will probably have to wait about 2 years before he receives any benefits because Uncle Sam has to sift through all the bullshit claims before getting to him. Why do you assume that everyone else's claims are "bullshit", any more than your brother's would be "bullshit"? And isn't your brother that very "dead weight" you speak of, whom you don't want to carry via taxation? I mean, you imply that he's applied for disability, but if he hasn't worked and paid into the system, isn't he leeching off society? That *IS* how you see it, isn't it? "Although it is not true that all conservatives are stupid people, it is true that most stupid people are conservatives." - John Stuart Mill
Friday, October 7, 2011 4:25 PM
FREMDFIRMA
Friday, October 7, 2011 5:29 PM
Quote:Originally posted by Kwicko: Never in my lifetime has the U.S. military protected me personally from any threat.
Friday, October 7, 2011 6:17 PM
Quote:Originally posted by Geezer: Quote:Originally posted by Kwicko: Never in my lifetime has the U.S. military protected me personally from any threat. Proof? Or more to the point, prove that the U.S. - military or government in general - hasn't protected anyone you care at all about from harm.
Saturday, October 8, 2011 4:14 AM
Quote:Originally posted by Kwicko: Quote:Originally posted by Geezer: Quote:Originally posted by Kwicko: Never in my lifetime has the U.S. military protected me personally from any threat. Proof? Or more to the point, prove that the U.S. - military or government in general - hasn't protected anyone you care at all about from harm. 1) Prove that they HAVEN'T protected me?
Saturday, October 8, 2011 4:17 AM
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: About the only thing I or anyone owes to society is to not be a burden on society, when we're mentally and physically capable of working and taking care of ourselves.
Saturday, October 8, 2011 4:36 AM
Quote:Originally posted by m52nickerson: Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: About the only thing I or anyone owes to society is to not be a burden on society, when we're mentally and physically capable of working and taking care of ourselves. Only if you don't use any of the things society has provided for you, but you do so.
Saturday, October 8, 2011 4:39 AM
Quote:Originally posted by Geezer: Quote:Originally posted by Kwicko: Quote:Originally posted by Geezer: Quote:Originally posted by Kwicko: Never in my lifetime has the U.S. military protected me personally from any threat. Proof? Or more to the point, prove that the U.S. - military or government in general - hasn't protected anyone you care at all about from harm. 1) Prove that they HAVEN'T protected me? Well yeah. You made the statement, you apparently believe it's true. You should have some evidence to support that belief. "Keep the Shiny side up"
Saturday, October 8, 2011 5:13 AM
Quote: sure, some percentage of em is gonna exploit it maybe, but frankly given the amount of shit they have to put up with, and the inherent pride of an individual, I don't think that percentage is very high, certainly nowhere near what assholes who profit from fucking the poor would have us think.
Quote: Unfortunately, he's not good with people (like Buster Bluth from Arrested Development) and always sabotages himself at jobs in the end. F--- .... at least he's trying......
Quote: prove that the U.S. - military or government in general - hasn't protected anyone you care at all about from harm.
Saturday, October 8, 2011 5:20 AM
Quote:Posted by Niki: We don't have to prove the military has never protected us; in our lifetimes, the only things the military has done is go overseas to invade other countries, countries who were literally incapable of harming us. They didn't even "protect" us from 9/11, or any of the other terrorist destruction that's happened here. How you can think they HAVE is what's weird, and the onus should be on YOU to provide proof they have, given that nobody IN this country has been threatened in such a way that the military protected them.
Saturday, October 8, 2011 2:31 PM
Quote:Originally posted by Niki2: We could go back and forth forever about WHO the safety nets protect and whether they deserve it or not, and you can bitch and moan all day about people who disabuse the system; the question is should we have the system or not, the way you phrase it.
Quote:Either we keep the system and let the government pay back the money it took via contract with us, and if it bothers us take action to fix it, or we toss the whole thing out. If the latter, hoo, boy, watch what happens to the country! With the rate of poverty we have NOW, even with safety nets, I can't even imagine what this place would look like if we took it all away!
Saturday, October 8, 2011 2:37 PM
Quote:Originally posted by 6ixStringJack: Once China cuts off our credit, a lot of people you probably know personally will seem a lot more like animals when the government shuts everything down because they're bankrupt.
Saturday, October 8, 2011 2:56 PM
Quote:Originally posted by m52nickerson: That is simple not going to happen. If our economy tanks there's will follow. They need us to buy their goods. I do not fear God, I fear the ignorance of man.
Saturday, October 8, 2011 3:08 PM
Quote: 1) My brother had a massive brain hemmorage at 6 years old and after the surgery the doctors said he'd never walk or talk again. My dad volunteered for a layoff when that happened and spent the next 6 months making him work out and do flash cards and all sorts of other things. Growing up, my other brother and I resented him so much for the extreme attention he was getting from our father, but today I'm so happy it was done because he just might still be a vegetable today if it hadn't been done. Yes! My brother deserves it!!!! No... I don't know where the line should be drawn, but when you have a kid who shouldn't be alive today who suffered more strokes than Keith Richards when he was only 6 years old, I think debate should be thrown right out the window!
Saturday, October 8, 2011 3:13 PM
Quote:Originally posted by Kwicko: Quote: 1) My brother had a massive brain hemmorage at 6 years old and after the surgery the doctors said he'd never walk or talk again. My dad volunteered for a layoff when that happened and spent the next 6 months making him work out and do flash cards and all sorts of other things. Growing up, my other brother and I resented him so much for the extreme attention he was getting from our father, but today I'm so happy it was done because he just might still be a vegetable today if it hadn't been done. Yes! My brother deserves it!!!! No... I don't know where the line should be drawn, but when you have a kid who shouldn't be alive today who suffered more strokes than Keith Richards when he was only 6 years old, I think debate should be thrown right out the window! Not to be too much of a dick about it, and trying to simply be OBJECTIVE, what you're saying is that your brother deserves special treatment that you feel nobody else deserves, simply because you know him personally and know how hard he's had it. Everybody's got a story, and many of them are sad. But according to you, we should just laugh them off because they're dumb-asses, and leave them to die. What I can't get my head around is this: If you think it's fine for governments to leave others to die (which, make no mistake, *IS* what you're advocating here), why should your brother be treated any differently? "Although it is not true that all conservatives are stupid people, it is true that most stupid people are conservatives." - John Stuart Mill
Saturday, October 8, 2011 3:38 PM
Quote:Originally posted by 6ixStringJack: Quote:Originally posted by Kwicko: Quote: 1) My brother had a massive brain hemmorage at 6 years old and after the surgery the doctors said he'd never walk or talk again. My dad volunteered for a layoff when that happened and spent the next 6 months making him work out and do flash cards and all sorts of other things. Growing up, my other brother and I resented him so much for the extreme attention he was getting from our father, but today I'm so happy it was done because he just might still be a vegetable today if it hadn't been done. Yes! My brother deserves it!!!! No... I don't know where the line should be drawn, but when you have a kid who shouldn't be alive today who suffered more strokes than Keith Richards when he was only 6 years old, I think debate should be thrown right out the window! Not to be too much of a dick about it, and trying to simply be OBJECTIVE, what you're saying is that your brother deserves special treatment that you feel nobody else deserves, simply because you know him personally and know how hard he's had it. Everybody's got a story, and many of them are sad. But according to you, we should just laugh them off because they're dumb-asses, and leave them to die. What I can't get my head around is this: If you think it's fine for governments to leave others to die (which, make no mistake, *IS* what you're advocating here), why should your brother be treated any differently? "Although it is not true that all conservatives are stupid people, it is true that most stupid people are conservatives." - John Stuart Mill Either you're stupid or being obtuse.... Have you never known people in your own life taking advantage of that system? For every 1 person who really deserves benefits, there are 5 taking advantage.
Quote: Fuck you for not noticing and recognizing.... seriously.... I usually censor my swears, but double fuck you
Quote: EDITED TO ADD: Thankfully, now that my brother has actually hit rock bottom, he's just now come out of an institution and has gotten a government paid psychological evaluation which lead the county to overload him on anti-depressants and anti-psychotics. Hopefully this is enough to finally get him the help he needs. Binder and Binder (on TV) wouldn't even talk to me about him a few years ago. Only one lawyer talked to me about 20 minutes and said he'd be able to get him SS benefits if he had a psych eval. Seriously.... ignore my brother otherwise.... Don't pay him benefits..... He'll probably string your sister or your wife up on a supporting beam if they work in close quarters if they cross him if you don't. Fuck you for judging me and fuck you for judging him.
Quote: There are so many NIGGERS (color of our skin not included in that comment) mooching off the system.
Saturday, October 8, 2011 3:45 PM
Quote:Originally posted by Kwicko: Quote:Originally posted by 6ixStringJack: Quote:Originally posted by Kwicko: Quote: 1) My brother had a massive brain hemmorage at 6 years old and after the surgery the doctors said he'd never walk or talk again. My dad volunteered for a layoff when that happened and spent the next 6 months making him work out and do flash cards and all sorts of other things. Growing up, my other brother and I resented him so much for the extreme attention he was getting from our father, but today I'm so happy it was done because he just might still be a vegetable today if it hadn't been done. Yes! My brother deserves it!!!! No... I don't know where the line should be drawn, but when you have a kid who shouldn't be alive today who suffered more strokes than Keith Richards when he was only 6 years old, I think debate should be thrown right out the window! Not to be too much of a dick about it, and trying to simply be OBJECTIVE, what you're saying is that your brother deserves special treatment that you feel nobody else deserves, simply because you know him personally and know how hard he's had it. Everybody's got a story, and many of them are sad. But according to you, we should just laugh them off because they're dumb-asses, and leave them to die. What I can't get my head around is this: If you think it's fine for governments to leave others to die (which, make no mistake, *IS* what you're advocating here), why should your brother be treated any differently? "Although it is not true that all conservatives are stupid people, it is true that most stupid people are conservatives." - John Stuart Mill Either you're stupid or being obtuse.... Have you never known people in your own life taking advantage of that system? For every 1 person who really deserves benefits, there are 5 taking advantage. Do you have ANY kind of evidence which backs up these ridiculous claims? Quote: Fuck you for not noticing and recognizing.... seriously.... I usually censor my swears, but double fuck you Why? For being honest and objective, when you clearly can't be? Quote: EDITED TO ADD: Thankfully, now that my brother has actually hit rock bottom, he's just now come out of an institution and has gotten a government paid psychological evaluation which lead the county to overload him on anti-depressants and anti-psychotics. Hopefully this is enough to finally get him the help he needs. Binder and Binder (on TV) wouldn't even talk to me about him a few years ago. Only one lawyer talked to me about 20 minutes and said he'd be able to get him SS benefits if he had a psych eval. Seriously.... ignore my brother otherwise.... Don't pay him benefits..... He'll probably string your sister or your wife up on a supporting beam if they work in close quarters if they cross him if you don't. Fuck you for judging me and fuck you for judging him. Who did I judge? Look at your own words - look how often you sit in judgment of others. And now you want to be pissed of AT ME about it. You're nothing but another right-wing hypocrite, Jack. Quote: There are so many NIGGERS (color of our skin not included in that comment) mooching off the system. Well aren't you just a bundle of fluffy love... "Although it is not true that all conservatives are stupid people, it is true that most stupid people are conservatives." - John Stuart Mill
Saturday, October 8, 2011 3:46 PM
Saturday, October 8, 2011 4:17 PM
MAGONSDAUGHTER
Quote:Originally posted by m52nickerson: Quote:Originally posted by Geezer: Quote:Originally posted by m52nickerson: Guess what, they live here that mean they pay for those things regardless if they use them. That was my point. They pay taxes to support services they never use. So should they get a rebate? "Keep the Shiny side up" No. I do not fear God, I fear the ignorance of man.
Saturday, October 8, 2011 4:29 PM
Quote:Originally posted by 6ixStringJack: I'm just tired of carrying the dead weight through taxes. Do you know that last year alone 1% of this country filed for disability because of how bad the job market is? This means that if my brother, who suffered an aneurysm, brain hemorrhage, and several strokes at six years old and was told he'd never walk or talk again (but did!) will probably have to wait about 2 years before he receives any benefits because Uncle Sam has to sift through all the bullshit claims before getting to him. Pluuueassseee..... You KNOW the system is f-ed. If you want to help people, do it on a local level. Stop raising my taxes to pay for stupid people who deserve bailouts on an individual level the same way that AIG did.
Sunday, October 9, 2011 5:19 AM
Quote:For every 1 person who really deserves benefits, there are 5 taking advantage.
Sunday, October 9, 2011 8:25 AM
OPPYH
Quote:Originally posted by Kwicko: What we're trying to make you see is that we want EVERYONE who needs help to get it. Your brother included.
Sunday, October 9, 2011 8:36 AM
Sunday, October 9, 2011 8:46 AM
Quote:Originally posted by 1kiki: Why are you so pissed of about small-change pikers, and not so pissed off about the rich people who are ripping off working Americans to the tune of 10s of trillions of dollars a year? I mean really, where's you sense of proportion? Remember when teachers, public employees, Planned Parenthood, NPR and PBS crashed the stock market, wiped out half of our 401Ks, took trillions in taxpayer funded bailouts, spilled oil in the Gulf of Mexico, gave themselves billions in bonuses, and paid no taxes? Yeah, me neither....
Sunday, October 9, 2011 8:50 AM
Quote:Originally posted by OPPYH: Quote:Originally posted by Kwicko: What we're trying to make you see is that we want EVERYONE who needs help to get it. Your brother included.
Sunday, October 9, 2011 9:56 AM
Quote:Originally posted by Kwicko: So go after THEM. Rather than throw out the whole system, why not go after the lawbreakers?
Sunday, October 9, 2011 10:02 AM
Quote:Originally posted by 1kiki: Why are you so pissed of about small-change pikers, and not so pissed off about the rich people who are ripping off working Americans to the tune of 10s of trillions of dollars a year? I mean really, where's you sense of proportion?
Sunday, October 9, 2011 12:45 PM
Quote:Originally posted by OPPYH: Quote:Originally posted by 1kiki: Why are you so pissed of about small-change pikers, and not so pissed off about the rich people who are ripping off working Americans to the tune of 10s of trillions of dollars a year? I mean really, where's you sense of proportion? BEcause, it's the small change pikers that we can do something about.....The rich will never be held accountable for fixing our financial fiasco. In a sense we are powerless to change that, so better to not even think about it.
Sunday, October 9, 2011 1:19 PM
Sunday, October 9, 2011 1:29 PM
Quote:Originally posted by 6ixStringJack: Quote:Originally posted by m52nickerson: That is simple not going to happen. If our economy tanks there's will follow. They need us to buy their goods. I do not fear God, I fear the ignorance of man. Sure.... I'm sure there has been a few times that people have said something similar.... 1) I'll never buy a color TV because it's expensive and it's just a fad. 2) Blockbuster and Hollywood Video CEOs say "This Netflix is just a fad. People love paying top dollar and driving to a store to rent a video." 3) The CEO of Columbia House decided against R&D into internet technology and after iTunes became successful the only people who know what Columbia House is are at least my age or older. 4) General Custer. 5) Personally, I think Jim Henson said it best when he said "Anybody got an aspirin? I think I've got a cold." ~ Dennis Leary Expect the unexpected brother. Do you think China is just sitting back and jacking off all over their profits? They laugh at us collecively since we have, for years, been giving them (what used to be) very valuable American currency for plastic shit at dollar stores and WalMart and they've been stockpiling gold, silver, iron and copper that was ored from here in the mean time. Do you really believe, in your gradeschool brainwashed mind, that we'll be on top forever, even if we have nothing at all to offer anyone else?????? Enjoy your Ikea furniture and Sauder shit from WalMart. What is it, exactly, that we even have to offer the world anymore today?????? "A government is a body of people, usually notably ungoverned." ~Shepherd Book BTW... I love my General Discussion Peeps. If you feel a strong need to judge me on RWED discussions I've had in the General Discussion, I welcome it, but I also say that they are two different worlds...... And while my core never wavers and though I may say things you don't like in the RWED, I'd never say them in General Discussions and I hope you would do the same.
Sunday, October 9, 2011 1:34 PM
Quote:Originally posted by 6ixStringJack: Here's the BOTTOM LINE, people.... YES, there are some people who diserve to be on "welfare" of some type. NO, most people recieving benefits don't deserve them. FACT 1: Those who take advantage of the system are facilitating the destruction of this system we all agree should exist for people who REALLY need it. FACT 2: Our 13 Trillion Dollar debt is doing nothing but rising. Yes, illegal wars and other major factors are at play here, and Obama has dropped the ball on a lot of those issues now that Bush is out, but all sorts of abused welfare from people who are too lazy to work to illegal immigrants scamming the system and getting free education and health care is a HUGE factor. FACT 3: One of the 3 credit bureaus actually downgraded the US credit rating in the last few months. FACT 4: There WILL come a day when China is a full fledged super power and their dependence on us will be a non issue. FACT 5: When the printing presses stop, we're all screwed. Taxes are too high on everything now as it is. They will only get higher as our completely unpayable national debt continues to rise. Better to cut back drastically on these programs and make sure the truly needy get them, rather than lose it all for everyone 10 years from now. "A government is a body of people, usually notably ungoverned." ~Shepherd Book BTW... I love my General Discussion Peeps. If you feel a strong need to judge me on RWED discussions I've had in the General Discussion, I welcome it, but I also say that they are two different worlds...... And while my core never wavers and though I may say things you don't like in the RWED, I'd never say them in General Discussions and I hope you would do the same.
Sunday, October 9, 2011 2:08 PM
Quote:Originally posted by m52nickerson: Lets see, we are still the largest economy in the world. We are still the worlds largest exporter. The dollar is still the worlds currency. China can stock pile gold, silver and anything else it wants. In the end those are only valuable if people continue to put a value on them. The world economy goes south things will only be worth anything if it can be eaten or used to catch something that can be eaten.
Quote:Originally posted by m52nickerson: China is a super power. Taxes have been higher in the past. We are not printing more money, and the credit downgrade has not amounted to anything.
Sunday, October 9, 2011 2:48 PM
Quote:Originally posted by 6ixStringJack: Let's see.... We are still the largest economy in the world because nations who are good with their money like China haven't called their debt in yet. The dollar is still the world's currency because nations who are good with their money like China enjoy deflating and inflating their own currency when it suits them because they are powerful enough to rock our currency when they do so.
Quote:Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:Oh yeah.... People will ALWAYS put value on finite resources like silver and gold. Sure... when the "end of days" comes, most people will be more concerned about food since those resources will be completely unattainable, but the top 1 to 10% will place a very high value on them while they're shuffling the rest of us around like pawns in their sick game of world chess.
Quote:Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:Yes... China is a super power. Indeed. I don't think people here either understand that, or understand the ramifications of that. Yes... we are constantly printing more money. And the scary thing is that our money isn't even backed up on the paper it's printed on since a majority of it is simply 1's and 0's on the internet. And, maybe the downgrade doesn't mean anything yet, but who are you kidding? Talk about hubris.....
Sunday, October 9, 2011 3:10 PM
Quote:Originally posted by m52nickerson: Quote:Originally posted by 6ixStringJack: Let's see.... We are still the largest economy in the world because nations who are good with their money like China haven't called their debt in yet. The dollar is still the world's currency because nations who are good with their money like China enjoy deflating and inflating their own currency when it suits them because they are powerful enough to rock our currency when they do so. Good with there money...really? http://the-diplomat.com/2011/07/05/china%E2%80%99s-ticking-debt-bomb/ If you calculate debt to GDP for China the way it is for the US and everyone else China's debt to GDP ratio is around 80%. Much higher then the US. Quote:Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:Oh yeah.... People will ALWAYS put value on finite resources like silver and gold. Sure... when the "end of days" comes, most people will be more concerned about food since those resources will be completely unattainable, but the top 1 to 10% will place a very high value on them while they're shuffling the rest of us around like pawns in their sick game of world chess. The top 1% to 10% had better worry about things like Iron, lead and saltpeter when the end comes. Quote:Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:Yes... China is a super power. Indeed. I don't think people here either understand that, or understand the ramifications of that. Yes... we are constantly printing more money. And the scary thing is that our money isn't even backed up on the paper it's printed on since a majority of it is simply 1's and 0's on the internet. And, maybe the downgrade doesn't mean anything yet, but who are you kidding? Talk about hubris..... We are printing new money to replace old money. Not adding money. No one backs their money to resources anymore. It is a fiat currency. What has the downgrade caused? I do not fear God, I fear the ignorance of man.
Sunday, October 9, 2011 8:42 PM
RIONAEIRE
Beir bua agus beannacht
Monday, October 10, 2011 3:05 AM
Quote:Originally posted by 6ixStringJack: Please man....... In the last 10-12 years we've seen gas prices normalize at $2.50 a gallon more than they were back then. Because of that, everything costs more today. In the mean time, we've all been having more kids than the generation before and welcoming illegals with open arms. Hell... I remember driving to Indiana when I was 17 because I could get gas there for 78 cents a gallon and buy smokes for 14 bucks a carton. I feel like an old man when I say that. Regardless of what the media says, inflation has been much higher than normal in the last decade, and it will likely only increase unless some serious changes are made. The only way to keep the country running, giving these HUGE changes, is by printing way more money. I don't have any hard evidence of this because I'm sure those figures don't even exist to the public.
Monday, October 10, 2011 3:56 AM
Quote: most people recieving benefits don't deserve them.
Monday, October 10, 2011 4:44 AM
Quote:MYTH: Welfare recipients commit a lot of fraud, at the expense of American working people. FACT: Besides the fact that a lot of welfare recipients are American working people, a study in Massachusetts showed that vendors committed 93% of welfare fraud. This aspect of the welfare system drastically needs reform: it is harming recipients as well as taxpayers. But all of the political attention is on limiting the amount of money going to recipients. And although the fraud by welfare vendors is terrible, it is a drop in the bucket compared to the burdens on the American taxpayer of military fraud, government waste, and corporate welfare. Time on AFDC Overview of Entitlement Programs, Committee on Ways and Means, U.S. House of Representatives (U.S. Government Printing Office, 1994) Less than 7 months 19.0% 7 to 12 months 15.2 One to two years 19.3 Two to five years 26.9 Over five years 19.6 The largest single group "on welfare" is children -- about one in every four children under the age of 18 receives welfare benefits. America has the greatest level of child poverty anywhere in the industrialized world: Percent of children below the poverty level (U.S. Bureau of the Census, Current Population Reports, P60-185) 1970 14.9% 1975 16.8 1980 19.5 1985 20.1 1990 19.9 1992 21.1 http://www.anitra.net/homelessness/columns/anitra/eightmyths.html] Quote:The US Department of Labor reported that 1.9% total UI payments for 2001 was attributable to fraud or abuse within the UI program. WikiQuote: Myth: People on welfare are usually black, teenage mothers who stay on ten years at a time. Fact: Most welfare recipients are non-black, adult and on welfare less than two years at a time. Summary According to the statistics, whites form the largest racial group on welfare; half of all welfare recipients leave in the first two years; and teenagers form less than 8 percent of all welfare mothers. Argument Here are the statistics on welfare recipients: Traits of families on AFDC (1) Race -------------- White 38.8% Black 37.2 Hispanic 17.8 Asian 2.8 Other 3.4 Time on AFDC --------------------------- Less than 7 months 19.0% 7 to 12 months 15.2 One to two years 19.3 Two to five years 26.9 Over five years 19.6 Number of children ------------------- One 43.2% Two 30.7 Three 15.8 Four or more 10.3 Age of Mother ------------------ Teenager 7.6% 20 - 29 47.9 30 - 39 32.7 40 or older 11.8 Status of Father 1973 1992 ------------------------------------- Divorced or separated 46.5% 28.6 Deceased 5.0 1.6 Unemployed or Disabled 14.3 9.0 Not married to mother 31.5 55.3 Other or Unknown 2.7 5.5 http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/L-welfareblack.htm found this in numerous places:Quote:Total Fraud Numbers Down. Welfare fraud statistics show an overall downward trend in absolute numbers, even while the US population shows a trend of population increase due to immigration and a positive birth rate. http://www.wise4living.com/mfraud/welfare.htm also found this from several different sources:Quote:Statement: Twenty-four percent of new welfare applications in San Diego County contain some form of fraud, the Los Angeles Times reported Oct. 4, 2010, based on information provided by John Haley, who oversees financial crime prosecutions for the District Attorney's Office in San Diego. Analysis: The state prosecutes for fraud in cases where people knowingly used false information for gain. By using the word "fraud," the District Attorney's Office indicated that nearly one out of every four welfare applicants in San Diego County intentionally tried to deceive county workers to receive benefits. But that's not what the figure actually represents. It includes both intentional misrepresentations and unintentional errors, such as information being taken down incorrectly by the county. When we called Haley about the statement, he said the number refers to all welfare applications reviewed by investigators between 2001 and 2009 that contained discrepancies. The office looks for discrepancies regarding the whereabouts of children and absent parents, unreported income or property, the whereabouts of applicants, and the existence of felony arrest warrants, Haley said. Not all of those application issues rose to the level of fraud, however. "It could be that they lied on the application," Haley said. "It could be that the person who took the application information took it down wrong." http://www.voiceofsandiego.org/fact/article_98889d8a-ed01-11df-a47b-001cc4c03286.html of those comes even close to the figure you cited, so could you please give information on where you got your figures and provide cites? Hippie Operative Nikovich Nikita Nicovna Talibani, Contracted Agent of Veritas Oilspillus, code name “Nike”, signing off
Quote:The US Department of Labor reported that 1.9% total UI payments for 2001 was attributable to fraud or abuse within the UI program. Wiki
Quote: Myth: People on welfare are usually black, teenage mothers who stay on ten years at a time. Fact: Most welfare recipients are non-black, adult and on welfare less than two years at a time. Summary According to the statistics, whites form the largest racial group on welfare; half of all welfare recipients leave in the first two years; and teenagers form less than 8 percent of all welfare mothers. Argument Here are the statistics on welfare recipients: Traits of families on AFDC (1) Race -------------- White 38.8% Black 37.2 Hispanic 17.8 Asian 2.8 Other 3.4 Time on AFDC --------------------------- Less than 7 months 19.0% 7 to 12 months 15.2 One to two years 19.3 Two to five years 26.9 Over five years 19.6 Number of children ------------------- One 43.2% Two 30.7 Three 15.8 Four or more 10.3 Age of Mother ------------------ Teenager 7.6% 20 - 29 47.9 30 - 39 32.7 40 or older 11.8 Status of Father 1973 1992 ------------------------------------- Divorced or separated 46.5% 28.6 Deceased 5.0 1.6 Unemployed or Disabled 14.3 9.0 Not married to mother 31.5 55.3 Other or Unknown 2.7 5.5 http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/L-welfareblack.htm found this in numerous places:Quote:Total Fraud Numbers Down. Welfare fraud statistics show an overall downward trend in absolute numbers, even while the US population shows a trend of population increase due to immigration and a positive birth rate. http://www.wise4living.com/mfraud/welfare.htm also found this from several different sources:Quote:Statement: Twenty-four percent of new welfare applications in San Diego County contain some form of fraud, the Los Angeles Times reported Oct. 4, 2010, based on information provided by John Haley, who oversees financial crime prosecutions for the District Attorney's Office in San Diego. Analysis: The state prosecutes for fraud in cases where people knowingly used false information for gain. By using the word "fraud," the District Attorney's Office indicated that nearly one out of every four welfare applicants in San Diego County intentionally tried to deceive county workers to receive benefits. But that's not what the figure actually represents. It includes both intentional misrepresentations and unintentional errors, such as information being taken down incorrectly by the county. When we called Haley about the statement, he said the number refers to all welfare applications reviewed by investigators between 2001 and 2009 that contained discrepancies. The office looks for discrepancies regarding the whereabouts of children and absent parents, unreported income or property, the whereabouts of applicants, and the existence of felony arrest warrants, Haley said. Not all of those application issues rose to the level of fraud, however. "It could be that they lied on the application," Haley said. "It could be that the person who took the application information took it down wrong." http://www.voiceofsandiego.org/fact/article_98889d8a-ed01-11df-a47b-001cc4c03286.html of those comes even close to the figure you cited, so could you please give information on where you got your figures and provide cites? Hippie Operative Nikovich Nikita Nicovna Talibani, Contracted Agent of Veritas Oilspillus, code name “Nike”, signing off
Quote:Total Fraud Numbers Down. Welfare fraud statistics show an overall downward trend in absolute numbers, even while the US population shows a trend of population increase due to immigration and a positive birth rate. http://www.wise4living.com/mfraud/welfare.htm also found this from several different sources:Quote:Statement: Twenty-four percent of new welfare applications in San Diego County contain some form of fraud, the Los Angeles Times reported Oct. 4, 2010, based on information provided by John Haley, who oversees financial crime prosecutions for the District Attorney's Office in San Diego. Analysis: The state prosecutes for fraud in cases where people knowingly used false information for gain. By using the word "fraud," the District Attorney's Office indicated that nearly one out of every four welfare applicants in San Diego County intentionally tried to deceive county workers to receive benefits. But that's not what the figure actually represents. It includes both intentional misrepresentations and unintentional errors, such as information being taken down incorrectly by the county. When we called Haley about the statement, he said the number refers to all welfare applications reviewed by investigators between 2001 and 2009 that contained discrepancies. The office looks for discrepancies regarding the whereabouts of children and absent parents, unreported income or property, the whereabouts of applicants, and the existence of felony arrest warrants, Haley said. Not all of those application issues rose to the level of fraud, however. "It could be that they lied on the application," Haley said. "It could be that the person who took the application information took it down wrong." http://www.voiceofsandiego.org/fact/article_98889d8a-ed01-11df-a47b-001cc4c03286.html of those comes even close to the figure you cited, so could you please give information on where you got your figures and provide cites? Hippie Operative Nikovich Nikita Nicovna Talibani, Contracted Agent of Veritas Oilspillus, code name “Nike”, signing off
Quote:Statement: Twenty-four percent of new welfare applications in San Diego County contain some form of fraud, the Los Angeles Times reported Oct. 4, 2010, based on information provided by John Haley, who oversees financial crime prosecutions for the District Attorney's Office in San Diego. Analysis: The state prosecutes for fraud in cases where people knowingly used false information for gain. By using the word "fraud," the District Attorney's Office indicated that nearly one out of every four welfare applicants in San Diego County intentionally tried to deceive county workers to receive benefits. But that's not what the figure actually represents. It includes both intentional misrepresentations and unintentional errors, such as information being taken down incorrectly by the county. When we called Haley about the statement, he said the number refers to all welfare applications reviewed by investigators between 2001 and 2009 that contained discrepancies. The office looks for discrepancies regarding the whereabouts of children and absent parents, unreported income or property, the whereabouts of applicants, and the existence of felony arrest warrants, Haley said. Not all of those application issues rose to the level of fraud, however. "It could be that they lied on the application," Haley said. "It could be that the person who took the application information took it down wrong." http://www.voiceofsandiego.org/fact/article_98889d8a-ed01-11df-a47b-001cc4c03286.html of those comes even close to the figure you cited, so could you please give information on where you got your figures and provide cites?
Monday, October 10, 2011 6:10 AM
SIGNYM
I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.
Quote:That was my point. They pay taxes to support services they never use. So should they get a rebate?
YOUR OPTIONS
NEW POSTS TODAY
OTHER TOPICS
FFF.NET SOCIAL