Quote:

---

Originally posted by JO753:
Siggy posted a pik uv Louie Gomert's chart in her Evidence II distraction thred. Here'z Steve Colbert to explain how stupid it iz:

---

It's just to funny JO, great post. Kiki says Sessions has agreed to asign a special counsel to investigate all this. I'm still waiting for her to tell us who that is.

Personally, I heard Sessions respond when asked why there isn't one,
that there isn't any evidence to warrant one. As for Trump, tick tock.


T

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THGRRI:
It's just to funny JO, great post. Kiki says Sessions has agreed to asign a special counsel to investigate all this.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THGRRI:
Personally, I heard Sessions respond when asked why there isn't one, that there isn't any evidence to warrant one.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1kiki:
Btw comrade troll, where's the quote and link? Can you only pretend to have an argument by making things up out of thin air?

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THGRRI:
It's just to funny JO, great post. Kiki says Sessions has agreed to asign a special counsel to investigate all this.

---

Actually, I noted that he DISCUSSED THE TOPIC OF APPOINTING A SPECIAL PROSECUTOR, when he said he was not at liberty to DISCUSS THE TOPIC.

And you agree. He DISCUSSED THE TOPIC OF APPOINTING A SPECIAL PROSECUTOR, when he said he was not at liberty to DISCUSS THE TOPIC.

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THGRRI:
Personally, I heard Sessions respond when asked why there isn't one, that there isn't any evidence to warrant one.

---

You may be right. It would be stupid to suggest from the tapes that he spoke about ongoing investigations. I may have misunderstood because apparently that's what you said he did. In the case of the Mueller or any ongoing investigation, he would not discuss specifics, but everyone already knows this is going on. So again, it would be pretty stupid to suggest Sessions discussed different investigations, or anything about what was going on within those investigations.

What he did discuss was what it would take to initiate an investigation. He said evidence of wrong doing, and he was in no way timid about implying the calls for investigations into Clinton lacked any.



T

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JO753:
I still hav a glimmer uv hope on collecting 50 buks kuz Trump duznt make it to 2018.

----------------------------
DUZ XaT SEM RiT TQ YQ? - Jubal Early

http://www.7532020.com

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by G:
OR...
Because ... AFTER you've been elected President, having your Son, Son-in-Law, and your campaign manager admit to meeting with Russians who say they have your election opponent's stolen emails is proof of pre-election collusion.

That's way better.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THGRRI:
263 days, 6 hours and 5 minutes until elections.

Tick tock


T

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THGRRI:
Please note that jacks answer is no comment when it comes to Russian meddling. Ask yourselves, why is that?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1kiki:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THGRRI:
No evidence, no evidence is all some here keep posting. It's an encumbrance around their necks as facts continue to be revealed.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THGRRI:
It's an investigation being led by a pro. His team doesn't leak. All we can do is accept what is known and wait for the rest.

---

Which is it, THUGGER? Is there evidence of collusion with Russia, or not?

---

Thirteen Russians indicted.


T

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THGRRI:
Nothing you and others say or post matters kiki. What is will be found out. What is will be revealed. What is, is now and and will continue to be dealt with.

T

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JO753:
This iz sum seriously wakky stuff rite here:
https://www.cnn.com/2018/03/05/politics/sam-nunberg-analysis/index.htm
l

I dont think he noz wut a subpeona iz.
http://litigation.findlaw.com/going-to-court/what-is-a-subpoena.html

Sooo...
You dont want to spend "30 owrz" ansrring questionz, but months or yirz in jail iz OK?

---

Tick tock JO.


T

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THGRRI:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JO753:
Sumwun new here reading this thred from the start woud probably think that Sig, KIKI and 6 are FSB operativez. They woud see how they defend Putin, distract with unrelated stuff and divert the conversation away from the orijinal topic.

Count how many posts there are about the election. Derailment seksesful!

---

Yep, you got that right JO. The proof lies in thread after thread here.

---

T

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Which sentence? I count 9 of them.


I agree though. A year later and now we supposedly have some real evidence, but they're not showing it to us.

#ReleaseTheMemo2

---

Quote:

---

Robert Hannigan, then the head of the U.K.’s intelligence service the G.C.H.Q., had recently flown to Washington and briefed the C.I.A.’s director, John Brennan, on a stream of illicit communications between Trump’s team and Moscow that had been intercepted.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THGRRI:

Tick tock JO.

---

Quote:

---

2015 Russian regime has been cultivating, supporting and assisting TRUMP for at least 5 years. Aim, endorsed by PUTIN, has been to encourage splits and divisions in western alliance.

---

Quote:

---

A dossier of compromising material on Hillary CLINTON has been collated by Russian Intelligence Services over many years and comprises mainly bugged conversations she had on various visits to Russia ...

---

Quote:

---

2016 Source E

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1kiki:
Instead of going on ... and on ... and on ... about what OTHER people say about the dossier, why not look for yourself?

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3259984-Trump-Intelligence-All
egations.html

Some things don't make sense to me.

Quote:

---

2015 Russian regime has been cultivating, supporting and assisting TRUMP for at least 5 years. Aim, endorsed by PUTIN, has been to encourage splits and divisions in western alliance.

---

Putin courted Trump for at least 5 years before the campaign as a political influence? What crystal ball was Putin using? I want it, too! Aside from finding amusement, this is a ridiculous premise. Russia was feeding Trump dirt on Hillary for YEARS before either ran in the primaries or was a presidential candidate? Anything related to that claim needs a whole lot of explaining, which it never gets. As does the fact that Trump never, according to Steele, took up any of Russia's business offers.

Quote:

---

A dossier of compromising material on Hillary CLINTON has been collated by Russian Intelligence Services over many years and comprises mainly bugged conversations she had on various visits to Russia ...

---

That means that there should be evidence of this in OUR records. And that means, either our 'intelligence' services are insufficiently non-partisan and diligent, or the dossier is bunk.

Quote:

---

2016 Source E

---

This section is nearly completely comprised of the unverified claims of Source E. And that requires a lot of trust in whoever that source is, their position to acquire knowledge, and their ability to transmit it without embellishment or bombast.

The rest of the document reads like a lurid diary. It makes many, many, many claims of contacts between Trump's people and various Russians, and documents the supposed Russian/ wikileaks efforts (but managed to not notice the 13 Russians in social media efforts).

Items of interest are that at least THREE secret meetings between Trump's representatives and Russian government officials are alleged to have occurred. Trips should be easy enough to document.

Finally, one of Steele's sources claimed Russia attempted to curry favor with Jill Stein and others by arranging to have their visit to Russia paid for. I thought Stein being questioned was bizarre. But that's one thing in the dossier that can be definitively crossed off the list as completely bogus, as is the claim that nothing in the dossier has been disproven.

---

---

---

So anyway ... anyone up for a rational, fact-based, and civil discussion about the topic?

---

Oops...

http://fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?bid=18&tid=61377&mid=10488
76#1048876


T

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JO753:
The ticks hav run out and there arent many tocks left. This week? Next week?

I'm feelin a major inditement rumbling down the chute, probably Kushner. Maybe Don Jr. Maybe both!

After that, Trump Sr haz to giv up the gost.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THGRRI:Oops...

http://fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?bid=18&tid=61377&mid=10488
76#104887

---