REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Let's focus on Russia!

POSTED BY: 1KIKI
UPDATED: Thursday, December 7, 2017 21:51
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 476
PAGE 1 of 1

Sunday, December 3, 2017 9:59 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


Because we can't do shit about NK and its missiles, or China and it's economy. And talking about those real issues will only needlessly upset the people at home.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, December 4, 2017 6:38 AM

G

... fully loaded, safety off...


Quote:

Originally posted by 1kiki:
Because we can't do shit about NK and its missiles, or China and it's economy.



Hey! You're finally right about something! Trump sure can't do sh*t about NK or China.

==============================

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, December 4, 2017 7:35 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

Because we can't do shit about NK and its missiles, or China and it's economy. - KIKI

Hey! You're finally right about something! Trump sure can't do sh*t about NK or China.= GSTRING



Actually, he can and he is as far as China is concerned. The entity that is helpless to do anything is OUR MILITARY, because neither one of these problems is amenable to a military solution.

China is a trade and economy problem. Previous Presidents, both Democratic and Republican, have sold our economy downriver, floating the USA on a sea of trade, personal, and government debt to ease/delay the impact. Bush and Obama pulled the pins on a series of grenades when they bailed out the banks and allowed the Fed to float the elite and blow a bunch of speculative bubbles with a zero-interest policy. Meanwhile, regular people are suffering for lack of jobs.

Yanno what I personally found instructive from 2008? In an extended discussion about happiness ... just before the collapse ... GEEZER and I were debating the happiest country in the world. At the time, it was Iceland. Yes, people were EXTREMELY happy there. You should look up what has happened to Iceland since. On the other had, you can keep your head buried in the sand.

******

NK is a diplomatic problem. According to experts, they've achieved the technological development required to build a nuclear-tipped missile which can reach most of the continental USA. All of that bluster, hand-wringing and sanctions over the last 15 years has not slowed NK's drive towards a nuclear weapon. Inf act, the USA's successive destruction of multiple nations since 2000 has only propelled the NK project forward.

Do you know what I find interesting about the last missile test? Not that it went 4500 km up, not that it COULD reach Wash DC if aimed for maximum distance. I found TWO things very interesting about the laucnh

1) None of those fancy THADD anti-missile missiles that we deployed in the area brought that missile down. They weren't even fired. WHY??

2) The missile landed very close to Japan. That speaks to very good targeting by the NK, since shooting a missile up into the air is a little like shooting an arrow up into the air: One teeny-tint wobble, and your missile has landed on Japan proper, and not into the nearby ocean.

Curiously, when asked what the NK's want, a former diplomat said that they wanted

1) To formally end the Korean War with a peace treaty, not a cessation of hostilities and

2) To be negotiated with on equal footing, and not to be bullied and hectored by the west.

Wow, such simple things. And none of the can be accomplished by the military. What's a neocon to do??? (sigh) GSTRING, since YOU'RE a neocon, maybe you can tell us?



-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, December 4, 2017 8:05 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Apparently SECOND, THUGR, GSTRING are all willing to get huffy about partisan issues, but none of them are willing to discuss REAL WORLD events, where issues like debt and military technology are important.

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, December 4, 2017 8:23 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


"Pentagon To Deploy THAAD Anti-Missile Systems On West Coast To Protect Against North Korean ICBM Attack"

Yes, because they worked so well in S Korea!
[/snicker]

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, December 4, 2017 10:09 AM

G

... fully loaded, safety off...


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:

Actually, he can and he is as far as China is concerned. The entity that is helpless to do anything is OUR MILITARY, because neither one of these problems is amenable to a military solution.



I love how you state the f*cking obvious and then try to take credit for it. You need to have higher standards. Some standards.

Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
China is a trade and economy problem. Previous Presidents, both Democratic and Republican, have sold our economy downriver, floating the USA on a sea of trade, personal, and government debt to ease/delay the impact. Bush and Obama pulled the pins on a series of grenades when they bailed out the banks and allowed the Fed to float the elite and blow a bunch of speculative bubbles with a zero-interest policy. Meanwhile, regular people are suffering for lack of jobs.



Stacking the sh*t as high as the sky I see. You sound like you're actually quoting Trump po-LIE-c, yes? Unemployment is low, and has been. It's at the point (below 5%) where it's an indicator that businesses can't find enough people to work. You're "Jobs!" mantra is as bad and misleading as all the other one word fart bombs you and the Republican Loyalists drop every chance they're in a closed space with more than 2 people. "Hillary!" "Obama!" "Freedom!" Fortunate for you but unfortunate for the country, there are plenty of stupid people that will believe you.

Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Wow, such simple things. And none of the can be accomplished by the military. What's a neocon to do??? (sigh) GSTRING, since YOU'RE a neocon, maybe you can tell us?




So sorry, not a NEOcon. Once again STINKY tries to win a debate with naming calling versus intelligence. I have a question: why are you so good at being wrong all the time? Lots of practice maybe?

Another question I'm sure you'll dodge: where's your NEOcon slur outrage for your dear fluffy lord, Trump? Maybe you missed his bigger best military in the world speech? You have missed so much it's a wonder you think it wise to act like you know anything.

==============================

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, December 4, 2017 11:35 AM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Quote:

Originally posted by G:

Stacking the sh*t as high as the sky I see. You sound like you're actually quoting Trump po-LIE-c, yes? Unemployment is low, and has been. It's at the point (below 5%) where it's an indicator that businesses can't find enough people to work. You're "Jobs!" mantra is as bad and misleading as all the other one word fart bombs you and the Republican Loyalists drop every chance they're in a closed space with more than 2 people. "Hillary!" "Obama!" "Freedom!" Fortunate for you but unfortunate for the country, there are plenty of stupid people that will believe you.



The job market is shit. The Trump Administration taking any credit for, or even saying that it is good is a like just like when Obama was saying it. Stop throwing out the government bullshit percentage numbers.

There are plenty of shitty minimum wage or close jobs out there now. A lot of the real jobs that you could support yourself on without government assistance are gone. Either to automation or cheaper labor overseas.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, December 4, 2017 3:07 PM

KPO

Anti-Russia before it was cool.


Kiki, Siggy, you two valiant information warriors can try and deflect away from Russia all you want, the heat's not coming off Trump any time soon.

-------------------------------------------------------

"Objective truths are established by evidence. Personal truths by faith. Political truths by incessant repetition."

Russia's and Assad's War Crimes in Syria - http://fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=60278
Syrian regime collusion with ISIS - http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=60521


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, December 4, 2017 4:00 PM

G

... fully loaded, safety off...


Quote:

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
The job market is shit.



Your experience is different than other people's, even in your own state:

Indiana is nearing its lowest unemployment rate ever

https://www.indystar.com/story/money/2017/07/21/indiana-nearing-its-lo
west-unemployment-rate-ever/500488001
/

Indiana's jobless rate tumbled for the fourth consecutive month in June, putting the state within reach of its record low.

The number of unemployed workers in Indiana fell by 6,515 people, or 0.2 percentage points, bringing the state's unemployment rate down to 3 percent. Indiana could soon match or beat its all-time low of 2.9 percent, which was last reached in October 2000.

Since the last time Indiana enjoyed record-low unemployment, the state's jobless rate ballooned to as high as 10.9 percent during the Great Recession. It has been steadily falling since March 2010 — outpacing the national recovery.

Indiana's unemployment rate during the past year fell by 1.5 percentage points, the second-fastest in the U.S. to Wyoming (1.6 percentage points). The U.S. unemployment rate is 4.4 percent.

Even as most out-of-work Indiana residents are finding job opportunities, though, wage growth has remained sluggish in Indiana. The state has consistently lagged U.S. wage growth during the recovery.

Personal income in Indiana grew by 0.7 percent between the fourth quarter of 2016 and first quarter of this year, according to the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis. That was the ninth-slowest growth in the U.S.

==============================

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, December 4, 2017 5:53 PM

WHOZIT


Quote:

Originally posted by 1kiki:
Because we can't do shit about NK and its missiles, or China and it's economy. And talking about those real issues will only needlessly upset the people at home.



Brian Ross NOW thinks the same thing...he's now taken up knitting.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, December 4, 2017 8:29 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Quote:

Originally posted by G:
Quote:

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
The job market is shit.



Your experience is different than other people's, even in your own state:

Indiana is nearing its lowest unemployment rate ever

https://www.indystar.com/story/money/2017/07/21/indiana-nearing-its-lo
west-unemployment-rate-ever/500488001
/

Indiana's jobless rate tumbled for the fourth consecutive month in June, putting the state within reach of its record low.

The number of unemployed workers in Indiana fell by 6,515 people, or 0.2 percentage points, bringing the state's unemployment rate down to 3 percent. Indiana could soon match or beat its all-time low of 2.9 percent, which was last reached in October 2000.

Since the last time Indiana enjoyed record-low unemployment, the state's jobless rate ballooned to as high as 10.9 percent during the Great Recession. It has been steadily falling since March 2010 — outpacing the national recovery.

Indiana's unemployment rate during the past year fell by 1.5 percentage points, the second-fastest in the U.S. to Wyoming (1.6 percentage points). The U.S. unemployment rate is 4.4 percent.

Even as most out-of-work Indiana residents are finding job opportunities, though, wage growth has remained sluggish in Indiana. The state has consistently lagged U.S. wage growth during the recovery.

Personal income in Indiana grew by 0.7 percent between the fourth quarter of 2016 and first quarter of this year, according to the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis. That was the ninth-slowest growth in the U.S.

==============================



There is nothing in that blurb you stated that refutes anything I said.

Personal income "raising" by 1.4% in a half a year doesn't even match the 2% needed to match the governments lowball 4% estimation of inflation.

Once again, another article that completely avoids talking about how many people are now working part time jobs for less money than they used to make as well, and doesn't take into account nearly 10 years of lost wages either.

Go figure.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, December 5, 2017 9:47 AM

G

... fully loaded, safety off...


Quote:

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
There is nothing in that blurb you stated that refutes anything I said.



You said "The job market is shit." That article says in your state it's never been better. Can't be both. I totally understand that raw data can be slanted or misread and misused - do you have some facts, details or other info other than your "feels" to back up that it's "shit?"

==============================

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, December 5, 2017 10:33 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

There is nothing in that blurb you stated that refutes anything I said. - SIX

You said "The job market is shit." That article says in your state it's never been better. Can't be both. I totally understand that raw data can be slanted or misread and misused - do you have some facts, details or other info other than your "feels" to back up that it's "shit?"- G



Yanno, GSTRING, if you were the least teeny-tiny bit interested in finding out what's really going on you'd already know what's wrong with the unemployment figures because it's been discussed many, many, many times before.

CLEARLY, you don't give a crap about being laid off or eking out a living as a free-lancer. My guess is that you're working in your daddy's company in a comfy middle-management niche where you can while away the hours posting on Firefly and endlessly checking your Twitter feed. But be that as it may ...

The big problems with the official unemployment figure is that it excludes anyone who is no longer looking for a job ("discouraged worker") and it INCLUDES as "employed" anyone who is working for even one hour a month, even if they need a full-time job. In addition, these figures are developed from a population of 60,000 households which are sampled over and over again; nobody seems to have questioned whether this frequent "sampling" affects the population's behavior.
https://www.bls.gov/cps/cps_htgm.htm

Just ponder the other's person's situation for a moment, if it's at all possible for you to consider how the average American manages to get along.

They could be officially earning something like $12 a month as an Uber driver, and still be officially "employed".

In addition, because Obamacare exempts anyone who works less than 30 hours a week from mandated coverage, many employers have specifically geared their positions to be something less than 30 hours a week.

There are many other ways of measuring the job market, and almost any one of them would be better than the "official" figure. There, in fact, six different OFFICIAL measures of unemployment https://www.bls.gov/lau/stalt.htm but only the most positive one is reported.

In addition, there are "proof of the pudding" measures. In other words, if the employment situation is so damn positive, then employer competition for workers should show up in wage increases, and if so many people are gainfully and sustainably employed then welfare payments should go down and poverty should decrease. Is any of that happening? If so, does it make up for the losses incurred in 2008-2016?

Which is why I always say ...

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, December 6, 2017 11:25 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Well, I guess G has nothing to say about unemployment.

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, December 6, 2017 12:52 PM

G

... fully loaded, safety off...


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Yanno, GSTRING, if you were the least teeny-tiny bit interested in finding out what's really going on you'd already know what's wrong with the unemployment figures because it's been discussed many, many, many times before.

CLEARLY, you don't give a crap about being laid off or eking out a living as a free-lancer. My guess is that you're working in your daddy's company in a comfy middle-management niche where you can while away the hours posting on Firefly and endlessly checking your Twitter feed. But be that as it may ...



Hilarious! You owe me a keyboard!

My "daddy" is dead btw.

Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
The big problems with the official unemployment figure is that it excludes anyone who is no longer looking for a job ("discouraged worker") and it INCLUDES as "employed" anyone who is working for even one hour a month, even if they need a full-time job. In addition, these figures are developed from a population of 60,000 households which are sampled over and over again; nobody seems to have questioned whether this frequent "sampling" affects the population's behavior.
https://www.bls.gov/cps/cps_htgm.htm

Just ponder the other's person's situation for a moment, if it's at all possible for you to consider how the average American manages to get along.

They could be officially earning something like $12 a month as an Uber driver, and still be officially "employed".

In addition, because Obamacare exempts anyone who works less than 30 hours a week from mandated coverage, many employers have specifically geared their positions to be something less than 30 hours a week.

There are many other ways of measuring the job market, and almost any one of them would be better than the "official" figure. There, in fact, six different OFFICIAL measures of unemployment https://www.bls.gov/lau/stalt.htm but only the most positive one is reported.

In addition, there are "proof of the pudding" measures. In other words, if the employment situation is so damn positive, then employer competition for workers should show up in wage increases, and if so many people are gainfully and sustainably employed then welfare payments should go down and poverty should decrease. Is any of that happening? If so, does it make up for the losses incurred in 2008-2016?

Which is why I always say ...

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake



Yanno STINKY, if you were the tiniest bit interested in understanding what I actually posted you'd find out where I got my numbers before ass-uming the most negative thing so you could use that as an excuse to then fill the screen with your obvious - big yawn - blah blah blah. But you clearly don't care, so neither do I. Carry on.


==============================

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, December 6, 2017 1:54 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

Yanno STINKY, if you were the tiniest bit interested in understanding what I actually posted you'd find out where I got my numbers ...
Yanno STUPID, if you were READ my post with the teeniest bit of comprehension, you;d have noticed that the "unemployment rate" which your article references is a BOGUS FIGURE, designed to plaster lipstick on a pig.

And as the article that YOU posted goes on to say ...
Quote:

Even as most out-of-work Indiana residents are finding job opportunities, though, wage growth has remained sluggish in Indiana.
Which means that employment is not so hot in Indiana.

It doesn't matter "where" you got that info from ... whether you get them from a paper in Indiana or Washington DC, bad metrics are bad metrics.

But hey! LETS'S FOCUS ON RUSSIA!

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, December 6, 2017 3:18 PM

G

... fully loaded, safety off...


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Quote:

Yanno STINKY, if you were the tiniest bit interested in understanding what I actually posted you'd find out where I got my numbers ...
Yanno STUPID, if you were READ my post with the teeniest bit of comprehension, you;d have noticed that the "unemployment rate" which your article references is a BOGUS FIGURE, designed to plaster lipstick on a pig.

And as the article that YOU posted goes on to say ...
Quote:

Even as most out-of-work Indiana residents are finding job opportunities, though, wage growth has remained sluggish in Indiana.
Which means that employment is not so hot in Indiana.

It doesn't matter "where" you got that info from ... whether you get them from a paper in Indiana or Washington DC, bad metrics are bad metrics.

But hey! LETS'S FOCUS ON RUSSIA!




I didn't get "my numbers" from that article - I posted that for Jack since he lives in Indiana to see if he had a response that wasn't all "feels" like he likes to criticize others with. Why don't you ask him where he got his numbers?
Sorry to ruin your day but I did say it's dangerous dealing with posted data. You should read people's posts before commenting maybe.

"Even as most out-of-work Indiana residents are finding job opportunities, though, wage growth has remained sluggish in Indiana." does not mean that employment is shit in Indiana. Maybe it's not ideal, but having a job is what counts, or don't you care about people having jobs, Lil' Ms. 1%?

Yes! We should focus on Russia! Maybe you think your boy Dumpf can't do more than one thing at a time?

==============================

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, December 6, 2017 4:09 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

"Even as most out-of-work Indiana residents are finding job opportunities, though, wage growth has remained sluggish in Indiana." ... but having a job is what counts


BECAUSE, as I posted before, you can work for one hour that month and still be counted as "employed".

"Having a job" is NOT "all that counts", if that job only pays you $100/ week and comes without benefits. I lived thru that, I have a very close relative who's struggling with that (and to whom I regularly send "care packages"), and a lot of other people on the board are dealing with that situation right now. And you would know about it too, if you ever had to face the reality of being underemployed, Mr. 0.01%.

Sheesh, you sound as if income doesn't matter! Talk about being disconnected from reality,

But, by all means, YOU focus on Russia. Apparently you don't have anything more important to think about.



-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, December 6, 2017 11:36 PM

WISHIMAY

There will be fire and brimstone and Earth will be destroyed!... in several billion years!----------------------------------------- "Well, so long Earth. Thanks for the air... and what-not." -Philip J. Fry


DOWN WITH TRUMP, DOWN WITH RUSSIA
DOWN WITH TRUMP, DOWN WITH RUSSIA
DOWN WITH TRUMP, DOWN WITH RUSSIA


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, December 6, 2017 11:54 PM

WISHIMAY

There will be fire and brimstone and Earth will be destroyed!... in several billion years!----------------------------------------- "Well, so long Earth. Thanks for the air... and what-not." -Philip J. Fry


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:


CLEARLY, you don't give a crap about being laid off or eking out a living as a free-lancer. My guess is that you're working in your daddy's company in a comfy middle-management niche where you can while away the hours posting on Firefly and endlessly checking your Twitter feed. But be that as it may ...




REALLY, You're gonna bitch about HIM being here to much when YOU NEVER SHUT THE HELL UP??? But then, he isn't paid to troll...

Sorry,
Internal
Garbage
Navigating
Yammering
Mind

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, December 7, 2017 6:25 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Did I hear WISHY's voice echoing from the bottom of a barrel? Something about ..."usher"??

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, December 7, 2017 9:38 AM

G

... fully loaded, safety off...


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Quote:

"Even as most out-of-work Indiana residents are finding job opportunities, though, wage growth has remained sluggish in Indiana." ... but having a job is what counts


BECAUSE, as I posted before, you can work for one hour that month and still be counted as "employed".



Who The F*ck works for an hour a month??? Talk about manipulating data/facts to prove a slanted agenda. You're such a habitual "fudger" of reality that you don't even know you're doing it - it's become a reflex for you.

Here's some more slant:

Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
"Having a job" is NOT "all that counts", if that job only pays you $100/ week and comes without benefits.



$100 a week?????? What job would that be? A 40 hour job? a 1 hour job? Who would work a 40 hour job that only paid $100?? Please explain that pile of STINKY BS.

Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
I lived thru that, I have a very close relative who's struggling with that (and to whom I regularly send "care packages"), and a lot of other people on the board are dealing with that situation right now. And you would know about it too, if you ever had to face the reality of being underemployed, Mr. 0.01%.



Serious question: How would you know what I've lived through? I expect an answer. Not answering will show you lie like Trump. Answering will show you make negative ass-umptions (lies) because that's the only way you can hope to make your lame ass points.

Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
But, by all means, YOU focus on Russia.



Ummmm, hon, did you not notice that YOUR comrade Kiki started this thread - did you see the title? "Let's focus on Russia!" Can you make yourself look any more idiotic? I don't think so!

==============================

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, December 7, 2017 10:25 AM

6IXSTRINGJACK


I have a job now. Compared to my last one, it's actually pretty good. I've learned to accept that this is probably my new life. Since I don't need much to survive, I can make do and actually save for a new car.

My take home pay will be around $400-$500, every two weeks. There are no health benefits, there is no vacation. I used to work 12 hour shifts and make that in 2 to 3 nights.

When I was laid off in 2009, I was making nearly $60k a year. I had 5 weeks vacation, health insurance, profit sharing, yearly company stock options, $2.5k a year shift differential for overnight work.


I'm actually at a company that should stick around for a while and seems to actually have room for advancement. I will likely never make what I used to make, but it's possible I might one day be able to get back up to $40k a year with some of those benefits back. I will have to work a hell of a lot harder for that money though, and I will have to manage employees, which is something I never did before.



Sure.... I got a job. I'm helping raise the employment numbers. But my job is paying roughly $45-$50k a year less than I used to make when you factor in all of the lost benefits on top of compensation.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, December 7, 2017 10:28 AM

6IXSTRINGJACK


I find it funny that a Democrat is arguing against me about employment numbers, especially with Trump as president. WTF is going on?

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, December 7, 2017 10:53 AM

WISHIMAY

There will be fire and brimstone and Earth will be destroyed!... in several billion years!----------------------------------------- "Well, so long Earth. Thanks for the air... and what-not." -Philip J. Fry


OMG...someone said JOB and 6ix automatically thinks they MUST be talking about him, right?

Doesn't have a clue it had nothing to do with him. Just has to talk about himself in any capacity

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, December 7, 2017 10:54 AM

THGRRI


Quote:

Originally posted by G:
Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Quote:

"Even as most out-of-work Indiana residents are finding job opportunities, though, wage growth has remained sluggish in Indiana." ... but having a job is what counts


BECAUSE, as I posted before, you can work for one hour that month and still be counted as "employed".



Who The F*ck works for an hour a month??? Talk about manipulating data/facts to prove a slanted agenda. You're such a habitual "fudger" of reality that you don't even know you're doing it - it's become a reflex for you.

Here's some more slant:

Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
"Having a job" is NOT "all that counts", if that job only pays you $100/ week and comes without benefits.



$100 a week?????? What job would that be? A 40 hour job? a 1 hour job? Who would work a 40 hour job that only paid $100?? Please explain that pile of STINKY BS.

Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
I lived thru that, I have a very close relative who's struggling with that (and to whom I regularly send "care packages"), and a lot of other people on the board are dealing with that situation right now. And you would know about it too, if you ever had to face the reality of being underemployed, Mr. 0.01%.



Serious question: How would you know what I've lived through? I expect an answer. Not answering will show you lie like Trump. Answering will show you make negative ass-umptions (lies) because that's the only way you can hope to make your lame ass points.

Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
But, by all means, YOU focus on Russia.



Ummmm, hon, did you not notice that YOUR comrade Kiki started this thread - did you see the title? "Let's focus on Russia!" Can you make yourself look any more idiotic? I don't think so!

==============================



G, lets remember sig forgets she is in Russia. That what she posts applies there not here.


T

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, December 7, 2017 10:57 AM

THGRRI


Quote:

Originally posted by Wishimay:
OMG...someone said JOB and 6ix automatically thinks they MUST be talking about him, right?

Doesn't have a clue it had nothing to do with him. Just has to talk about himself in any capacity



Jack does that all the time. Especially to SECOND. He gets pissed because SECOND tries to move on. He expects a response so what SECOND posts confuses and upsets him. His thinking is fussy, and that's being generous.


T

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, December 7, 2017 11:07 AM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Second can't deal with the fact that I've been shutting him down left and right. At least most of the time he just doesn't reply anymore, rather than quoting one sentence of what I've said and then posting a completely unrelated article.

Second doesn't debate. Second just talks to himself. He's said so several times himself.



All you and Wishy do T is throw baseless insults all of the time. Your ability to debate leaves a lot to be desired as well.



And by the way Wishy, we've been talking about jobs in here for quite a while. Unless you have anything worthwhile to add, please go back under your bridge.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, December 7, 2017 11:34 AM

THGRRI


Quote:

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Second can't deal with the fact that I've been shutting him down left and right. At least most of the time he just doesn't reply anymore, rather than quoting one sentence of what I've said and then posting a completely unrelated article.

Second doesn't debate. Second just talks to himself. He's said so several times himself.



All you and Wishy do T is throw baseless insults all of the time. Your ability to debate leaves a lot to be desired as well.



And by the way Wishy, we've been talking about jobs in here for quite a while. Unless you have anything worthwhile to add, please go back under your bridge.

Do Right, Be Right. :)



Delusional Jack, you are delusional.

T

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, December 7, 2017 11:40 AM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Oh. Okay.

Nothing to reply but insults again, I see.

This is how it's going to be from now on then, huh T?

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, December 7, 2017 11:44 AM

THGRRI


Quote:

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Oh. Okay.

Nothing to reply but insults again, I see.

This is how it's going to be from now on then, huh T?

Do Right, Be Right. :)



Here's an insight Jack. Recently you said you had posted really intelligent things. Recently Jack, you said recently. That is an admission that what you had been posting was not. So Jack, go back and reread the crap of the past and you will see it's as dumb as the shit you are posting currently.



T

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, December 7, 2017 11:47 AM

6IXSTRINGJACK


Recently as in for the last nearly full year since I've been sober... Yanno, how nobody can forget that I used to be a drunk since you bring it up every 4 posts or so.

I back up any post I've written in 2017.

Care to try posting again to me without an insult, T?


I'm beginning to think that it's impossible for you to do.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, December 7, 2017 11:52 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

"Even as most out-of-work Indiana residents are finding job opportunities, though, wage growth has remained sluggish in Indiana." ... but having a job is what counts- G

BECAUSE, as I posted before, you can work for one hour that month and still be counted as "employed". - SIGNY

Who The F*ck works for an hour a month???

Someone who can't find any other job. People in the "gig" economy: Uber, Lyft, TaskRabbit. Yanno, people who don't have any other options. People YOU apparently wouldn't know anything about, in your very comfortable life.

Quote:

Talk about manipulating data/facts to prove a slanted agenda.
Bullshit. I'm simply repeating WHAT THE BUREAU OF LABOR STATS says about its own metrics.
You?
You're just a liar.

Quote:

You're such a habitual "fudger" of reality that you don't even know you're doing it - it's become a reflex for you.- G
Yes, indeed: You are.

Quote:

Here's some more slant:

Quote:

"Having a job" is NOT "all that counts", if that job only pays you $100/ week and comes without benefits.- SIGNY


$100 a week?????? What job would that be? A 40 hour job? a 1 hour job? Who would work a 40 hour job that only paid $100??

Damnit G, are you being stupid ON PURPOSE??? I KNOW people who're making only $100 a week. NO, it's not a 40-hour job! That's the point! Barristas. Walmart greeters. Part-timers. "Independent contractors" and "freelancers". People who work in nursing homes. Lawn-mowers. People on Social Security who need to make a money under the table. There are hundreds and hundreds of kinds of jobs that are part time, where the pay is very low and/or unreliable.

I PERSONALLY know a person who worked in security who only got "overflow" work. Someone who worked as a freelance technical editor who got about four or five papers a month. Another person who was a part-timer at a florist shop. Yet another person who worked at an adult daycare center. A motorcycle mechanic who was regularly unemployed in winter. A homeless man who does gardening for $100. An under-the-table oddjobber/ handyman.

Quote:

Please explain that pile of STINKY BS.
Yes indeed, please explain YOUR pile of stinky BS.

Quote:

I lived thru that, I have a very close relative who's struggling with that (and to whom I regularly send "care packages"), and a lot of other people on the board are dealing with that situation right now. And you would know about it too, if you ever had to face the reality of being underemployed, Mr. 0.01%.- SIGNY

Serious question: How would you know what I've lived through? I expect an answer. Not answering will show you lie like Trump. Answering will show you make negative ass-umptions (lies) because that's the only way you can hope to make your lame ass points.- GSTRING

Because IF YOU HAD LIVED THRU HAVING TO EKE OUT A LIVING ON MINIMAL PART TIME JOBS, you wouldn't question their existence. Since I know people PERSONALLY who're living thru that situation right now, I know for a fact that they do exist.

Quote:

But, by all means, YOU focus on Russia.- SIGNY

Ummmm, hon, did you not notice that YOUR comrade Kiki started this thread - did you see the title? "Let's focus on Russia!" Can you make yourself look any more idiotic? I don't think so!- GSTRING

Can YOU make yourself look more idiotic? Please don't pretend that this was a non-ironic title, because you'll either look very very stupid, or you'll look like a liar. (I vote for "liar" because I know for a fact that you are.)

All you've shown yourself to be is someone who is vastly removed from the travails and insecurities of ordinary life. So removed, you don't know anybody like that. So removed, you can't even accept that it happens. Really, I have no idea what kind of world you live in, but it's very, very insulated from real life because you don't know .... and don't even see (or think about)... the marginally employed.


-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, December 7, 2017 12:27 PM

SECOND

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly


Quote:

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Second doesn't debate. Second just talks to himself. He's said so several times himself.

And I will say again that scarcely one man in a hundred is worth disputing with. Let the 99% remainder say what they please, for every one is at liberty to be a fool**. La paix vaut encore mieux que la verite.

http://coolhaus.de/art-of-controversy/erist38.htm

** 6ixStringJack, Signym, and 1kiki

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, December 7, 2017 12:29 PM

THGRRI


Quote:

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Recently as in for the last nearly full year since I've been sober... Yanno, how nobody can forget that I used to be a drunk since you bring it up every 4 posts or so.

I back up any post I've written in 2017.

Care to try posting again to me without an insult, T?


I'm beginning to think that it's impossible for you to do.




Sure, I'll just post something from another thread addressing the issue of insulting posts towards others.

Ready

Quote:

Originally posted by G:
Quote:

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

I've been giving extremely intelligent replies around here lately, and unlike the people who regularly attack me, I don't throw the insults back at them and I try to keep it civil.



Really???

Jack:

"You'll have to answer that question for us, G. Which birthday did you just celebrate between the OP and this last post? Your 16th, or your 18th?"

"Were all the men in your family pieces of shit?"

"Do YOU think for yourself, or do you just let the MSM do all of your thinking for you now?"

"I figured this thread would get the troll to crawl out from whatever bridge she's been hiding under in those deep south Indiana bogs she shares with the other inbred hill people from Wrong Turn."

"G is free to feel as much guilt and shame as he wants to feel for being a male..."

"…She can't even give her husband a break. Even though he gives her bung sex which she craves..."

"Flame on, ultra-bitch."

"This thread title and the OP that followed it were childish."

Maybe you should take your own advice: "Check yourself before you wreck yourself, princess."

==============================



All this from the guy who's posted to many times to count that others insult him but he insults no one. To funny G, to funny.

What a moron and liar this guy is. What do you suppose he'll say in response to these facts G. I'm thinking he'll deal with them much the same way as he deals with facts about Trump.




T

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, December 7, 2017 12:33 PM

G

... fully loaded, safety off...


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Quote:

"Even as most out-of-work Indiana residents are finding job opportunities, though, wage growth has remained sluggish in Indiana." ... but having a job is what counts- G

BECAUSE, as I posted before, you can work for one hour that month and still be counted as "employed". - SIGNY

Who The F*ck works for an hour a month???

Someone who can't find any other job. People in the "gig" economy: Uber, Lyft, TaskRabbit. Yanno, people who don't have any other options. People YOU apparently wouldn't know anything about, in your very comfortable life.

Quote:

Talk about manipulating data/facts to prove a slanted agenda.
Bullshit. I'm simply repeating WHAT THE BUREAU OF LABOR STATS says about its own metrics.
You?
You're just a liar.

Quote:

You're such a habitual "fudger" of reality that you don't even know you're doing it - it's become a reflex for you.- G
Yes, indeed: You are.

Quote:

Here's some more slant:

Quote:

"Having a job" is NOT "all that counts", if that job only pays you $100/ week and comes without benefits.- SIGNY


$100 a week?????? What job would that be? A 40 hour job? a 1 hour job? Who would work a 40 hour job that only paid $100??

Damnit G, are you being stupid ON PURPOSE??? I KNOW people who're making only $100 a week. NO, it's not a 40-hour job! That's the point! Barristas. Walmart greeters. Part-timers. "Independent contractors" and "freelancers". People who work in nursing homes. Lawn-mowers. People on Social Security who need to make a money under the table. There are hundreds and hundreds of kinds of jobs that are part time, where the pay is very low and/or unreliable.

I PERSONALLY know a person who worked in security who only got "overflow" work. Someone who worked as a freelance technical editor who got about four or five papers a month. Another person who was a part-timer at a florist shop. Yet another person who worked at an adult daycare center. A motorcycle mechanic who was regularly unemployed in winter. A homeless man who does gardening for $100. An under-the-table oddjobber/ handyman.

Quote:

Please explain that pile of STINKY BS.
Yes indeed, please explain YOUR pile of stinky BS.

Quote:

I lived thru that, I have a very close relative who's struggling with that (and to whom I regularly send "care packages"), and a lot of other people on the board are dealing with that situation right now. And you would know about it too, if you ever had to face the reality of being underemployed, Mr. 0.01%.- SIGNY

Serious question: How would you know what I've lived through? I expect an answer. Not answering will show you lie like Trump. Answering will show you make negative ass-umptions (lies) because that's the only way you can hope to make your lame ass points.- GSTRING

Because IF YOU HAD LIVED THRU HAVING TO EKE OUT A LIVING ON MINIMAL PART TIME JOBS, you wouldn't question their existence. Since I know people PERSONALLY who're living thru that situation right now, I know for a fact that they do exist.

Quote:

But, by all means, YOU focus on Russia.- SIGNY

Ummmm, hon, did you not notice that YOUR comrade Kiki started this thread - did you see the title? "Let's focus on Russia!" Can you make yourself look any more idiotic? I don't think so!- GSTRING

Can YOU make yourself look more idiotic? Please don't pretend that this was a non-ironic title, because you'll either look very very stupid, or you'll look like a liar. (I vote for "liar" because I know for a fact that you are.)

All you've shown yourself to be is someone who is vastly removed from the travails and insecurities of ordinary life. So removed, you don't know anybody like that. So removed, you can't even accept that it happens. Really, I have no idea what kind of world you live in, but it's very, very insulated from real life because you don't know .... and don't even see (or think about)... the marginally employed.


-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake



Every sentence you type is STINKY make believe fantasy land. I used to be a waiter, 5 years, remember? Or do you only keep track of what you say? And because I know people too - some people don't want to work more. They're ok with working less and making less. JUST ASK JACK. You think he's working a 40 hour week for that $250 a week? No? So he has time for another job if he wants to - and there are jobs to be had. It's not easy, it's not fun, applying for work is even a little scary for some people, but they are there.
You've argued yourself into a corner again.

STINKY: "Please don't pretend that this was a non-ironic title, because you'll either look very very stupid, or you'll look like a liar. I vote for "liar" because I know for a fact that you are."

Of COURSE it's ironic - duh. Kiki couldn't be funny about anything else she has to make a thread with that subject? So who is fixated? Obviously Kikster is.

==============================

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, December 7, 2017 12:35 PM

THGRRI


Quote:

Originally posted by second:
Quote:

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Second doesn't debate. Second just talks to himself. He's said so several times himself.

And I will say again that scarcely one man in a hundred is worth disputing with. Let the 99% remainder say what they please, for every one is at liberty to be a fool**. La paix vaut encore mieux que la verite.

http://coolhaus.de/art-of-controversy/erist38.htm

** 6ixStringJack, Signym, and 1kiki



Your link leads to some very insightful thoughts.


T

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, December 7, 2017 12:45 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

Every sentence you type is STINKY make believe fantasy land. I used to be a waiter, 5 years, remember? Or do you only keep track of what you say? And because I know people too - some people don't want to work more. They're ok with working less and making less. JUST ASK JACK. You think he's working a 40 hour week for that $250 a week? No? So he has time for another job if he wants to - and there are jobs to be had. It's not easy, it's not fun, applying for work is even a little scary for some people, but they are there.
You've argued yourself into a corner again. = GSTRING

Not at all.

First of all, you can only EXIST ON YOUR OWN on $100/week if you either live an incredibly impoverished existence - eg homeless or living like a hermit in a paid-for home - because there is no way that anyone could afford normal rent or a mortgage payment on that amount of money. People who HAPPILY accept those wages are being supported by someone else: Living in student housing on a loan, or for which mom and dad are paying; living with mom and dad ... sometimes off mom/dad's Social Security; being supported by a husband or wife; working while collecting Social Security; or bumming room and board from friends

... because there's no way in hell that $100 is a "living wage".

Secondly, my point is that people who work only one hour a month ARE COUNTED AS EMPLOYED. That's the fact, son.

Now, I happen to know real people who are eking out a living on incredibly skimpy wages, and SURELY you've passed a Walmart greeter or gotten a burger from fast-food place or bought a latte from somewhere, so arguing that those people or those jobs "don't exist" is either a complete denial of reality or a deliberate lie.



-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, December 7, 2017 1:59 PM

G

... fully loaded, safety off...


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Quote:

Every sentence you type is STINKY make believe fantasy land. I used to be a waiter, 5 years, remember? Or do you only keep track of what you say? And because I know people too - some people don't want to work more. They're ok with working less and making less. JUST ASK JACK. You think he's working a 40 hour week for that $250 a week? No? So he has time for another job if he wants to - and there are jobs to be had. It's not easy, it's not fun, applying for work is even a little scary for some people, but they are there.
You've argued yourself into a corner again. = GSTRING

Not at all.

First of all, you can only EXIST ON YOUR OWN on $100/week if you either live an incredibly impoverished existence - eg homeless or living like a hermit in a paid-for home - because there is no way that anyone could afford normal rent or a mortgage payment on that amount of money. People who HAPPILY accept those wages are being supported by someone else: Living in student housing on a loan, or for which mom and dad are paying; living with mom and dad ... sometimes off mom/dad's Social Security; being supported by a husband or wife; working while collecting Social Security; or bumming room and board from friends

... because there's no way in hell that $100 is a "living wage".

Secondly, my point is that people who work only one hour a month ARE COUNTED AS EMPLOYED. That's the fact, son.

Now, I happen to know real people who are eking out a living on incredibly skimpy wages, and SURELY you've passed a Walmart greeter or gotten a burger from fast-food place or bought a latte from somewhere, so arguing that those people or those jobs "don't exist" is either a complete denial of reality or a deliberate lie.




Who said they don't exist? The voices in your head?

There aren't enough people working "an hour a month" to influence any statistics about employment - you gotta be kidding me. And I am talking about people who support themselves or are the primary wage earner for a family, not spouses or kids who are supported by others.

"... because there's no way in hell that $100 is a "living wage." Exactly! So it follows that those people are not sole providers or living alone off that wage.

==============================

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, December 7, 2017 2:24 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

... because there's no way in hell that $100 is a "living wage."- SIGNY

Exactly! So it follows that those people are not sole providers or living alone off that wage. - G



Well, thank you GSTRING for proving my point. "Having a job" is NOT "all that counts".

There ARE people working 1-39 hours a week, there are people who are making $12/hr when they used to make $30/hr.

THESE PEOPLE ARE CONSIDERED AS MUCH "EMPLOYED" as the people who're working 40+ hours a week.

So as far as the "unemployment" statistic is concerned, it looks pretty rosy, but for people just scraping, by they're a cruel mockery.

IF the job wages and hours of the "recovery" had stayed the same relative to before the collapse, then the "unemployment" figures would be a realistic reflection of "how people are doing". But because of Obamacare which encourages less-than-30-hour-a-week jobs; the rise of "temping" and "gig economy"; and the loss of manufacturing; MOST of the jobs added have been low-wage/ part time jobs which simply can't support a single person, let alone a family.

So we come to "proof of the pudding" measures about the "employment" situation in Indiana, which is: Are wages rising? Are young people able to get out of mom and dad's basement? Is the poverty rate going down?

I see that, in your comfortable niche, such concerns don't trouble you.

But, yanno, seriously, I think you should focus on Russia. It's a great distraction for the "deplorables" and keeps them from thinking about people like you.

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, December 7, 2017 4:11 PM

G

... fully loaded, safety off...


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Quote:

... because there's no way in hell that $100 is a "living wage."- SIGNY

Exactly! So it follows that those people are not sole providers or living alone off that wage. - G



Well, thank you GSTRING for proving my point. "Having a job" is NOT "all that counts".




Thanks for misquoting again - you can't seem to break your lying habit. I said it was the most important thing. You can't get paid if you don't have a job. You do understand that, right?

Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
There ARE people working 1-39 hours a week,



still sticking with that "1 hour a week" nothing thing, huh? You're a complete idiot.

Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
IF the job wages and hours of the "recovery" had stayed the same relative to before the collapse, then the "unemployment" figures would be a realistic reflection of "how people are doing". But because of Obamacare which encourages less-than-30-hour-a-week jobs; the rise of "temping" and "gig economy"; and the loss of manufacturing; MOST of the jobs added have been low-wage/ part time jobs which simply can't support a single person, let alone a family.



Wow - cites on all that?

Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
So we come to "proof of the pudding" measures about the "employment" situation in Indiana, which is: Are wages rising? Are young people able to get out of mom and dad's basement? Is the poverty rate going down?



How many people do you think are living in their parents' basement btw? Do you think it's worse now than it was in the past? Loosing manufactuering? Don't you think we've been through shifts in job types in the past? Look what the car did to stage coach drivers.

https://www.mckinsey.com/global-themes/future-of-organizations-and-wor
k/what-the-future-of-work-will-mean-for-jobs-skills-and-wages



==============================

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, December 7, 2017 4:34 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

... because there's no way in hell that $100 is a "living wage."- SIGNY

Exactly! So it follows that those people are not sole providers or living alone off that wage. - G

Well, thank you GSTRING for proving my point. "Having a job" is NOT "all that counts".- SIGNY

Thanks for misquoting again - you can't seem to break your lying habit. I said it was the most important thing. - G

You said
Quote:

Maybe it's not ideal, but having a job is what counts
Nothing in there about being the most important, or any mention of wages, hours, benefits, or anything else.

Quote:

There ARE people working 1-39 hours a week- SIGNY

still sticking with that "1 hour a week" nothing thing, huh? You're a complete idiot.-G

Still ignoring the underemployed? You're an entitled elitist.

Quote:

IF the job wages and hours of the "recovery" had stayed the same relative to before the collapse, then the "unemployment" figures would be a realistic reflection of "how people are doing". But because of Obamacare which encourages less-than-30-hour-a-week jobs; the rise of "temping" and "gig economy"; and the loss of manufacturing; MOST of the jobs added have been low-wage/ part time jobs which simply can't support a single person, let alone a family.- SIGNY

Wow - cites on all that?- G

Later. But when I bring those number to the board, will you eat your words? DOUBTFUL.

Quote:

So we come to "proof of the pudding" measures about the "employment" situation in Indiana, which is: Are wages rising? Are young people able to get out of mom and dad's basement? Is the poverty rate going down?- SIGNY

How many people do you think are living in their parents' basement btw? Do you think it's worse now than it was in the past? - G

Absofuckinglutely.
Quote:

Loosing (sic) manufactuering? (sic) Don't you think we've been through shifts in job types in the past? Look what the car did to stage coach drivers.
This "job shift" is shifting jobs out of America. All I have to do is look at "the employment situation" and the falling standard of living pretty much across the board to realize that this is not a "job shift" that bodes well for most of us.

But what the hell do YOU care? YOU don't work for a living.

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, December 7, 2017 5:24 PM

SECOND

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:

This "job shift" is shifting jobs out of America. All I have to do is look at "the employment situation" and the falling standard of living pretty much across the board to realize that this is not a "job shift" that bodes well for most of us.

But what the hell do YOU care? YOU don't work for a living.

Maybe you should ask the Republicans for help rather than expect fireflyfans to solve this problem? I know one President and 52 GOP Senators could demand business increase employment by 5% per year, every year, in exchange for a business tax cut to 20%. But nothing happens for some reason. The GOP won’t increase the minimum wage. The GOP won’t help expand unions, either. What is wrong with the GOP? Why does it dislike labor? To see all the many things that the GOP won’t do, you can google minimum wage legislation Unions GOP.
www.google.com/search?q=minimum+wage+legislation+Unions+GOP

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, December 7, 2017 5:37 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

This "job shift" is shifting jobs out of America. All I have to do is look at "the employment situation" and the falling standard of living pretty much across the board to realize that this is not a "job shift" that bodes well for most of us.

But what the hell do YOU care? YOU don't work for a living. - SIGNY

Maybe you should ask the Republicans for help rather than expect fireflyfans to solve this problem?- SECOND

Maybe you should show a little patriotism and some faith in democracy?

Or take your own advice, and STFU about Trump?



-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, December 7, 2017 5:55 PM

SECOND

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:

Maybe you should show a little patriotism and some faith in democracy?

Or take your own advice, and STFU about Trump?

Did you know that under Trump, US jobs are moving overseas even faster than before? I won't bother you with the article's numbers but it also mentions "Low-skill workers still struggle to find jobs that can support a family or afford the education for work that does. It’s not clear, however, that the Trump agenda is going to bring them much relief." Not clear is an understatement. Completely opaque, upside down, or non-functioning Trump agenda is more accurate.
https://qz.com/1144201

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, December 7, 2017 6:33 PM

THGRRI


Wikileaks faces U.S. probes into its 2016 election role and CIA leaks: sources

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - WikiLeaks and its founder, Julian Assange, are facing multiple investigations by U.S. authorities, including three congressional probes and a federal criminal inquiry, sources familiar with the investigations said.

The Senate and House of Representatives intelligence committees and leaders of the Senate Judiciary Committee are probing the website's role in the 2016 U.S. presidential election campaign, according to the sources, who all requested anonymity, and public documents.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/wikileaks-faces-u-probes-2016-election-role
-cia-173513427.html






T

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, December 7, 2017 7:23 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Wikileaks can withstand any number of investigations because (1) They've done nothing wrong and (2) they KNOW who gave them the DNC/Podesta emails and it wasn't a Russian.

So this will be a dry hole for the investigators to look into, but hey, investigate away!



-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, December 7, 2017 7:52 PM

SECOND

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly


Signym! I anxiously wait to hear Trump's carefully thought out plan of action for the next 7 years:

The U.S. economy is creating millionaires at an astonishing pace. But what’s it doing for everyone else?
www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2017/12/07/the-u-s-economy-is-crea
ting-millionaires-at-an-astonishing-pace-but-whats-it-doing-for-everyone-else
/

The U.S. economy is minting new millionaires at an astonishing rate, according to a paper by New York University economist Edward N. Wolff. http://papers.nber.org/tmp/7707-w24085.pdf

The number of households with a net worth of $1 million (measured in constant 1995 dollars, or about $1.6 million today) grew from 2.4 million households in 1983 to 9.1 million households in 2016, a growth rate of 279 percent.

For comparison, the total number of households grew by just 50 percent over that period, meaning that the population of millionaires grew at more than 5 times the rate of the general population. In 1983 fewer than 3 percent of households had a net worth greater than $1 million in 1995 dollars. By 2016, over 7 percent of households were worth that much.

Net worth is a measure of a household's assets, such as home value, stocks and retirement accounts, minus debts. From 2013 to 2016 alone, the economy added over 2 million households with a net worth of $1 million or more in constant 1995 dollars. That works out to roughly 1,845 new millionaire households each day during that period.

Rates of growth in the upper echelons of the wealth spectrum have been even more rapid. From 1983 to 2016, the number of households worth $5 million grew by 649 percent. The number of households worth $10 million or more grew by 856 percent over the same period.

Wolff's research has also shown that the richest 1 percent of Americans now own nearly twice as much wealth as the bottom 90 percent combined.

Similarly, gains in income have been flowing primarily to the richest households in recent years.

Regardless of the number of millionaires created each day, the rise in inequality could spell trouble for the economy if it continues unabated. Too much inequality can depress economic growth in a number of ways. As the Economist summarized the research in 2015, “inequality could impair growth if those with low incomes suffer poor health and low productivity as a result, or if, as evidence suggests, the poor struggle to finance investments in education.”
www.economist.com/blogs/economist-explains/2015/06/economist-explains-
11

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, December 7, 2017 9:51 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

Signym! I anxiously wait to hear Trump's carefully thought out plan of action for the next 7 years
SECOND! I anxiously await the DNC's carefully thought-out plan for the next 7 years!

Or are they going to continue focusing on Russia???

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
Where are the democrats? Waiting for the Deep State to get rid of Trump?
Mon, December 11, 2017 14:07 - 20 posts
Accusing Someone You Disagree With Of Being A Russian Troll Is Admitting You Have No Argument
Mon, December 11, 2017 13:53 - 83 posts
Bomb Exploded Times Square
Mon, December 11, 2017 13:13 - 5 posts
Putin Orders Withdrawal Of Russian Troops During Surprise Syria Visit
Mon, December 11, 2017 11:23 - 1 posts
Game Companies are Morons.
Mon, December 11, 2017 10:27 - 45 posts
Male Role Models
Mon, December 11, 2017 10:25 - 108 posts
New Alabama Motto Contest
Mon, December 11, 2017 08:09 - 6 posts
A thread for Democrats Only
Sun, December 10, 2017 23:25 - 236 posts
In the garden, and RAIN!!!!
Sun, December 10, 2017 16:12 - 265 posts
Shout out to Second - hope you are doing well
Sun, December 10, 2017 10:02 - 210 posts
Trump not invited to Paris December climate change summit for now, says France
Sun, December 10, 2017 08:59 - 5 posts
Trump moves US Embassy to Jerusalem
Sun, December 10, 2017 01:16 - 28 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL