REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

NRA wants to focus on mentally ill

POSTED BY: NIKI2
UPDATED: Thursday, January 17, 2013 13:32
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 5245
PAGE 1 of 1

Friday, January 11, 2013 6:59 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


I knew it was coming...
Quote:

In his Friday morning news conference, National Rifle Association chief executive Wayne LaPierre floated the idea of a national registry of the mentally ill as one way to stem gun violence.

“How can we possibly even guess how many, given our nation’s refusal to create an active national database of the mentally ill?” he asked.

Turns out, many states are ahead of him: 38 states require or authorize the use of certain mental health records for use in a firearm background check, according to the Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence, a San Francisco-based nonprofit that tracks state level gun legislation.

The Gun Control Act of 1968 prohibits gun sales to individuals who have been committed to a mental institution or “adjudicated as a mental defective.”

“The federal law pretty much says that anyone who has been involuntarily committed or anyone who has been determined by a court to be a danger to themselves or others, those two categories are prohibited from possessing firearms,” says Lindsay Nichols, an attorney with the Center to Prevent Gun Violence.

That prohibition stands today but is pretty difficult to enforce, partially due to the issue LaPierre mentioned: Reporting on mental health status is incomplete, with a hodgepodge of state laws that specify what information does, or does not, go into the federal background check system. More at http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2012/12/21/the-nra-wan
ts-an-active-mental-illness-database-thirty-eight-states-have-that-now/


Mind you, as put forth, I have no problem with such a registry of those Nichols described, who have been INVOLUNTARILY committed or are a danger to themselves or others. But the NRA's "national registry of the mentally ill" sickens me--let's put everyone who's ever had a mental illness on a national registry, but gawd forbid we should consider a registry of those who own weapons. There are FAR more people with a mental disorder who've never been violent than there are gun owners who've killed someone! Like we don't have a big enough problem trying to overcome the stigma that comes with a mental illness AS IT IS! How many years have we been trying to counter that stigma with education and information...and he wants to further stigmatize us?

It's a distraction, I realize that. We need to deal with the SERIOUSLY mentally ill AS WELL AS dealing with assault weapons and the gun-show loophole. What good is a national registry of ANYONE when guns can be bought without even a background check? Which of course the NRA would fight tooth and nail...

"Hey! Look over here! Don't look over there!"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, January 11, 2013 8:22 AM

JONGSSTRAW


The most severe mentally ill in this country are the militias and the survivalists. Both groups are full of paranoid sociopaths. The typical NRA member doesn't possess, desire, or have any use for assault weapons with large capacity clips. The second amendment doesn't give anyone the right to play Rambo.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, January 11, 2013 8:49 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Amen.

But yeah, there are severely mentally ill people; to me, survivalists, etc., are just "nuts", not severely mentally ill. But I take your point (as intended, I believe).

Tit for tat got us where we are today. If we want to be grownups, we need to resist the ugliness. If we each did, this would be a better reflection on Firefly and a more welcome place. I will try.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, January 11, 2013 8:51 AM

STORYMARK


If they are honest about this, I suggest they invest in a large mirror.




Excuse me while I soak in all these sweet, sweet conservative tears.

"We will never have the elite, smart people on our side." -- Rick "Frothy" Santorum

"Goram it kid, let's frak this thing and go home! Engage!"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, January 11, 2013 9:00 AM

HKCAVALIER


Quote:

Originally posted by Storymark:
If they are honest about this, I suggest they invest in a large mirror.

Already in the works:
http://www.worldsstrangest.com/neatorama/nazi-scientists-proposed-crea
ting-a-giant-space-mirror-to-burn-enemy-nations
/

HKCavalier

Hey, hey, hey, don't be mean. We don't have to be mean, because, remember, no matter where you go, there you are.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, January 11, 2013 9:49 AM

SHINYGOODGUY


The NRA solution is never about the proliferation of assault-type weapons, such as the weapon used in the movie theater massacre. It's always about people killing people, never about the ease in which these "people" can obtain these weapons of mass destruction.

Mind you I'm not against the 2d Amendment - I'm all for it. But there are those that believe our Mr. LaPeepee who's knee-jerk reaction is all too familiar - "Guns don't kill people..." etc. and that any deviation from owning any gun that the gun manufacturers produce can never be questioned or qualified. If you dare to say that guns need to be classified, then you are the enemy, and deviation from their interpretation of the "right to bear arms" is is both unAmerican and treasonist.

The Constitution, or more accurately the Bill of Rights, was not written to be dissected and applied piecemeal. It is a living document meant to govern by and for the citizenry. That is the genius of the instrument, it is part and parcel why we were admired and emulated the world over. Notice I said were. I equate the treatment and execution of the document to how Christians use the Bible. "Believers" tend to pick and choose which of the commandments they are to follow and enforce. I read somewhere that the Constitution was meant to be applied in whole, and not by the sum of it's parts.

It is my belief that the Framers created the document, and brilliantly so, to act in unison and in concert - much like an orchestra, or, to use a more appropriate example, like a crew. Take one out and it all goes awry. The NRA and gun enthusiasts tend to treat the 2d Amendment as scripture and apply their holier-than-thou rhetoric with a Patriotic fervor unmatched by even devout Bible-thumping Christians. It is my argument that the Framers realized that times would eventually change, so they crafted a flexibility within the document that would stand the test of time - the wording was such as to remind those who would impose their will and attempt to overrule the majority of the citizenry.

As someone pointed out, Prohibition (18th) was an awful failure, which gave rise to the Repeal (21st). Was it the will of the people that everyone should stop drinking? The majority of Americans rejected that notion outright with their behavior. But let's put aside the ill-conceived notion that the evils of the world started and ended with consuming alcohol. Some may argue that banning certain guns would meet the same fate. Apples and Oranges. We are talking about a law that was written in the 1920s, a different time and era. When the Framers wrote the Bill of Rights, it was at a time when we were taking our first baby steps as a nation. They were addressing a specific set of negative circumstances and impositions brought on by tyranny. This was during the days of the blunderbuss. We've come a long way since, our weapons practically reload themselves.

"Most of what we consider to be our “constitutional rights” are in those 10 amendments. We suffer sometimes from their ambiguity, much of which arises from the passage of time. The Bill of Rights says that the government needs a warrant to search your home but the Framers didn’t anticipate the possibility that a 21st century GPS tracker surreptitiously placed on a suspect’s car could also invade privacy. The Supremes had to decide whether it did (and they decided it did)."

http://www.minnpost.com/eric-black-ink/2012/12/constitutional-amendmen
ts-so-far-most-have-been-better


Which brings to mind an important question: Which of the Amendments is totally indispencable? None, according to Eric Black's article. People, there are 27 Amendments, do we have it right yet? When did women get the right to vote in this country? 1919 (appropriately the 19th Amendment). It is meant to grow and expand along with us as a people and a nation. The Framers knew this to be true and specifically entered the 9th Amendment into the Bill of Rights - "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people."

It is clearly stated, that the people have the right to affect change regarding the law of the land. Both in theory and in practice, the Constitution and Bill of Rights, are a living breathing affirmation of those rights and our obligation as citizens. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that we have been given a tool in which to "form a more perfect union."

We must do what it takes to "establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity." Document, regulate and secure the criminally, mentally challenged among us. Document, regulate and secure weapons of mass destruction and war so as to promote the general welfare and blessings of liberty.

"Freedom is just another word for nothing left to lose."


SGG

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, January 11, 2013 10:17 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Shiny, Shiny! ;o) Beautifully written and I agree.

Tit for tat got us where we are today. If we want to be grownups, we need to resist the ugliness. If we each did, this would be a better reflection on Firefly and a more welcome place. I will try.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, January 11, 2013 12:42 PM

MAGONSDAUGHTER


Quote:

Originally posted by Niki2:
I knew it was coming...
Quote:

In his Friday morning news conference, National Rifle Association chief executive Wayne LaPierre floated the idea of a national registry of the mentally ill as one way to stem gun violence.

“How can we possibly even guess how many, given our nation’s refusal to create an active national database of the mentally ill?” he asked.

Turns out, many states are ahead of him: 38 states require or authorize the use of certain mental health records for use in a firearm background check, according to the Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence, a San Francisco-based nonprofit that tracks state level gun legislation.

The Gun Control Act of 1968 prohibits gun sales to individuals who have been committed to a mental institution or “adjudicated as a mental defective.”

“The federal law pretty much says that anyone who has been involuntarily committed or anyone who has been determined by a court to be a danger to themselves or others, those two categories are prohibited from possessing firearms,” says Lindsay Nichols, an attorney with the Center to Prevent Gun Violence.

That prohibition stands today but is pretty difficult to enforce, partially due to the issue LaPierre mentioned: Reporting on mental health status is incomplete, with a hodgepodge of state laws that specify what information does, or does not, go into the federal background check system. More at http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2012/12/21/the-nra-wan
ts-an-active-mental-illness-database-thirty-eight-states-have-that-now/


Mind you, as put forth, I have no problem with such a registry of those Nichols described, who have been INVOLUNTARILY committed or are a danger to themselves or others. But the NRA's "national registry of the mentally ill" sickens me--let's put everyone who's ever had a mental illness on a national registry, but gawd forbid we should consider a registry of those who own weapons. There are FAR more people with a mental disorder who've never been violent than there are gun owners who've killed someone! Like we don't have a big enough problem trying to overcome the stigma that comes with a mental illness AS IT IS! How many years have we been trying to counter that stigma with education and information...and he wants to further stigmatize us?

It's a distraction, I realize that. We need to deal with the SERIOUSLY mentally ill AS WELL AS dealing with assault weapons and the gun-show loophole. What good is a national registry of ANYONE when guns can be bought without even a background check? Which of course the NRA would fight tooth and nail...

"Hey! Look over here! Don't look over there!"



Ha, having a register for mental illness is preferably to a register for gun ownership. Can't get my head around that.

How will 'mental illness' be defined? If you've been for counselling are you mentally ill? If you've ever been described anti depressants, anti anxiety medication? If so, that will be some seriously large register.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, January 11, 2013 1:12 PM

ARLO

-.-. ..- -- / -.-. .- - .- .--. ..- .-.. - .- . / .--. .-. --- ... -.-. .-. .. .--. - .- . / . .-. .- - --..-- / - ..- -- / ... --- .-.. .. / .--. .-. --- ... -.-. .-. .. .--. - / -.-. .- - .- .--. ..- .-.. - .- ... / .... .- -... . ..- -. -


Whew. Just glad to see this wasn't about a membership drive.

sincerely, 1933

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, January 11, 2013 4:53 PM

PIRATENEWS

John Lee, conspiracy therapist at Hollywood award-winner History Channel-mocked SNL-spoofed PirateNew.org wooHOO!!!!!!



All 'shooters' in MKULTRA mind kontrol with CIA, Pentagon, FBI or police families

Colonel James Fetzer US Marine Corps: Sandy Hook Is a Huge Hoax and Anti-Gun “Psy Op”
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/12/27/sandy-hook-huge-hoax-and-anti-
gun-psy-op
/

No blood or dead bodies at Sandy Hook School
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/01/06/sandy-hook-analogies-with-the-
london-77-bombings
/

Quote:


"So, if poison pills or a lethal injection can be considered “medicine,” why can’t a Colt 45 be deemed a palliative medical device? The result is the same, after all."
-Wesley J. Smith attorney at law blog, Cartoon Illustrates Need For Conscience Clause Protecting Hippocratic Physicians
http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/author/wesley-j-smith/p
age/6
/

“You will never get accustomed to killing somebody. Writing a prescription is like giving a patient a loaded gun and just asking him not to shoot before you leave the house.”
-Dr Pieter Admiraal M.D., leader of The Netherlands euthanasia movement, American Medical News 9/15/1997

"The most stunning statistic, however, is that the total number of deaths caused by conventional medicine is an astounding 783,936 per year. It is now evident that the American medical system is the leading cause of death and injury in the US. Using Leape's 1997 medical and drug error rate would add another 216,000 deaths, for a total of 999,936 deaths annually. Our estimated 10-year total of 7.8 million iatrogenic* deaths is more than all the casualties from all the wars fought by the US throughout its entire history. Our considerably higher figure is equivalent to six jumbo jets are falling out of the sky each day."
—Gary Null, PhD; Carolyn Dean MD, ND; Martin Feldman, MD; Debora Rasio, MD; Dorothy Smith, PhD, "Death by Medicine", March 2004 (plus 10-Million annual aborticides in USA)
http://www.lef.org/magazine/mag2004/mar2004_awsi_death_01.htm

"Harold Shipman, the British family doctor who murdered more than 200 of his patients to become one of the worst serial killers of all time, hanged himself in his prison cell on the eve of his 58th birthday, prison officials said. Shipman was sentenced to life imprisonment in January 2000 for the murder of 15 female patients between 1975 and 1998, and faced no prospect of parole. Two years later an inquiry concluded that he was responsible for the deaths by lethal injection of at least another 200 mostly female and elderly patients at his greater Manchester area practice. Most of Shipman's victims died suddenly without having experienced any life-threatening symptoms. They were, by and large, elderly women who died after being given a lethal injection, usually of morphine, while Shipman visited them in their homes."
—Reuters, "Britain's worst serial killer Dr. 'Death' dies in prison," January 13, 2004
www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/s1024925.htm

"The Centers for Disease Control says that 100,000 young athletes between the ages of 13 and 30 drop dead every year, either during exercise, during a sporting event or immediately after. Or twice that."
-Dr Joel Wallach ND DVM, Nobel Prize nominee, Dead Athletes Don't Lie, author of Dead Doctors Don't Lie (46-million copies sold)
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=9000052717197218681&hl=en
http://firstamendmentradio.com
http://www.wallachonline.com
http://www.deaddoctors.com



Doctors murder 1,000 Amerikans for every innocent person murdered by firearm.

Playing ordinary sports kills 100 Amerikans for every innocent person murdered by firearm.

Governments genocided 400-million of their own citizens after gun bans, including over 150-million Amerikans genocided by the Amerikan govt (African slaves, Native Americans, aborted babies).

Obama gave 20,000 guns to the Mexican mafia that chopped heads off 30,000 cops, politicians, judges, prosecutors, beauty queens and journalists.








NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, January 13, 2013 7:39 PM

RIONAEIRE

Beir bua agus beannacht


I had a coronary about this on another thread, because I'm not okay with a national registry of people who happen to have mental illness. And then Shiny said something awful and I had a nuclear fit and everyone ignored me, even though I was so totally right ...
Anyway I see he has altered his way of talking about this which I commend him for.

In OR a person cannot buy a gun if they've been committed (civilly) in the last several years, not sure on the number. I don't think its a never ending time amount though, I think if someone has been doing pretty well and so forth they're allowed again after a certain amount of time. That idea makes sense to me. I don't mind people not being able to buy new guns fresh out of hospital, wait until you're doing better and mannaging better and then buy one.

"A completely coherant River means writers don't deliver" KatTaya

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, January 14, 2013 7:12 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Quote:

Ha, having a register for mental illness is preferably to a register for gun ownership. Can't get my head around that.

How will 'mental illness' be defined? If you've been for counselling are you mentally ill? If you've ever been described anti depressants, anti anxiety medication? If so, that will be some seriously large register.


Yeah, that one blows me away, too. From what I'm hearing now, they're talking "seriously" mentally ill, while I've heard others talk about people who were hospitalized against their will, and some have mentioned people who a psyciatrist has deemed a danger to themselves or others--in other words, "adjudicated" mentally ill. I can't believe they'd ever try to do a registry of ALL who have suffered mental illness; as you said, that would be enormous.

By the way, Riona, you know I'M right there with you, and have posted the same incredulity and anger you have. Chalk it up to people's lack of understanding of mental illness, which we both know is immense. When I was first dx'd, it shocked ME, and the more I learned about the prevaling ignorance of mental illness, the more shocked I was. Now it rolls off my back like water; in fact I expect it. You can't understand unless/until you've been there.

Brenda, it does still blow me away, and I agree, the number of mentally ill who commit murder is infintesimal; unfortunately, they tend to be high-profile crimes, and, also as you said, the authorities are quick to latch onto "crazy" whether there's any definitive facts or not. People are too quick to assume anyone who commits mass murder is mentally ill, which makes sense; what sane person would? Problem is, the attribute mental illness to things like people who go to a workplace for retribution, etc. We can't know what-all goes into a person becoming violent, and the "crazy" label is hung on many who most likely were not.

Of course it's scapegoating, as are their pointing to violent games, TV, movies, even SONGS. We all know that, and the NRA's comments brought on a firestorm of anger BECAUSE they were trying to point the finger at anything but guns. We're a weird country. While guns and death are a part of life in many poor countries or countries suffering insurgencies, dictatorships, etc., we are the only rich and supposedly "civilized" country with such a high gun-death rate. At the same time, our legislators are terrified of doing ANYTHING because of the power of the NRA and their financial support. Even the majority of NRA MEMBERS want better background checks, banning of assault weapons and high-capacity magazines, etc. The NRA doesn't work for their members OR gun owners; they work for the gun manufacturers, pure and simple. There was a time when they worked for their members, but that has long passed. Their power and influence, unfortunately, has not.

Looked at objectively, it kind of makes your head spin. But as I said, we're a weird country.

Tit for tat got us where we are today. If we want to be grownups, we need to resist the ugliness. If we each did, this would be a better reflection on Firefly and a more welcome place. I will try.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, January 14, 2013 8:17 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


I think I'm going to be ill...
David Keene, NRA President:
http://www.cnn.com/video/?hpt=hp_bn3#/video/us/2013/01/10/tsr-bts-nra-
keene-gun-control.cnn



Tit for tat got us where we are today. If we want to be grownups, we need to resist the ugliness. If we each did, this would be a better reflection on Firefly and a more welcome place. I will try.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, January 14, 2013 10:34 AM

FREMDFIRMA



Oh I think this whole bru-hah is very instructive.
Folks are totally okay with OTHER people winding up on a "list", but when the same thing they wanna do unto others comes around and points at them it's suddenly all manner of offensive, yeah, sure...

And yes, I am not unaware that possessing weapons is a choice, but mental illness isn't(1), I just want it understood that the NOTION of such "lists" is offensive to anyone and everyone, and it should be - to point at another something you've no desire to have inflicted on yourself is hypocritical.

Remember the Golden Rule.

-Frem

PS - Cor blimey, luv, ya think I nae 'ave me own issues, ehe?"

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, January 15, 2013 7:28 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


The fact that mental illness isn't something we CHOOSE to have is one pertinent point for me.

I'm actually hearing them be more specific and talking about people who have been adjudicated mentally ill, and I actually have no problem with that. I've known some in my time who probably should be on some kind of watch list or something, and it might actually help (that is, if we ever got universal background checks!). One in particular, a really smart, neat bipolar lady who, when her pharmacist refused to give her drugs to suicide when she was in a manic phase, went back to her car and got a tire iron, and attacked him. I sure wouldn't want her to have a gun!

So if it's just people who've been adjudicated severely mentally ill, and those who (at least TWO) psychiatrists have determined are a danger to themselves or others, I have no problem with a national list. They may not have chosen to be mentally ill, but just as with gun owners, if they're a danger, I have no problem with them being on some kind of watch list. It might have avoided some of the horrors we've seen, and/or future ones.

If I suffered from things like that woman went through, or was otherwise unable to control my illness with meds and my own efforts to the point where I might be a danger to others, I'd want someone watching over me, no problem. You see, most of us who have a mental disorder DO depend on others to help us; we look to friends and family to tell us when they recognize we're in an episode and we don't, and we depend on our p-docs to help us "jiggle" our "cocktails"--after FIRST finding a p-doc we can trust, of course! So no, if it pertained to me I'd have NO problem being on some kind of watch list. I recognize the inherent problems of that, but the potential to prevent horrors outweighs that for me.

So no, whatever you may believe, I'm neither a hypocrite NOR a liar. As always, aside from saying that I'd have no problem with such a list (EVEN if, by some weird circumstance, I was eligible for it), I'll not bother to discuss the gun issue with you further.

Tit for tat got us where we are today. If we want to be grownups, we need to resist the ugliness. If we each did, this would be a better reflection on Firefly and a more welcome place. I will try.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, January 15, 2013 7:54 AM

FREMDFIRMA



I think the situation might benefit substantially from something like a buddy system amongst those with problems, even if it's something unofficial via social media - this'd help a lot with folk who have no family.

I myself am a little more skittish about the whole notion you mentioned cause one of the tacks the schools and various bastards I've dealt with have tried is exactly that, trying to get me declared mentally ill and a danger to self and others, it's a COMMON game with them even now, one of the things the Hellcamps do to get subsidy/Govt money (Teen Challenge, especially), Schools do it to get rid of "square pegs", and as I mentioned before my sister tried it on my niece as an act of revenge for finally being called out on her abusive parenting.

The only bright side to the severe lack of resources and funding for mental health care in this country is that because of how tight they are, folks in the system who even THINK a case carries a whiff of that kind of bullshit will pitch it out in a heartbeat - unless they're one somebodys payroll like Bacharach is for the AA County Public School System.

That whole end of business offends me not just cause it carries echos of soviet gulags and the horrors of re-education, but because it wastes resources that there aren't nearly enough of which otherwise coulda gone to help someone who NEEDED help, that just pisses me off, it does.

And in a creepy kind of irony, the one time I *was* cracked enough to really BE, even in my own estimation, crazy and dangerous to others, that happened be EXACTLY what the military, in the person of one bastard named Lindyear, WANTED, and thus were wholeheartedly encouraging and supporting it so long as it was pointed in the directions they desired.
They didn't like it so much when I realized what some of their intentions were and turned my madness back around on them though, that for a fact.

I honestly don't know how many folk are psychologically iatrogenic thanks to manipulation, corruption, or bad experiences with mental health personnel, cause from my end of the things the percentage I've dealt with is heavily skewed for obvious reasons, but I think the notion of a buddy system might be one of the ways around that, and on any scale whatever could be helpful - certainly it's unlikely to make the situation worse.

Hmm, that brings to mind something I hadn't thought of, worth a little gentle experimentation - Kira hasn't to my recall wandered off when a younger kid is with her, so maybe assigning her an "anchor" would be a useful idea....

-F

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, January 15, 2013 8:28 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


We already know how "well" a buddy-system, including those in schools whose job it is to report such things, has already worked. Like NOT.

The ramifications of such a thing being an option are just as bad as those you enumerated; it hasn't worked, repeatedly; and requiring it will never happen.

Tit for tat got us where we are today. If we want to be grownups, we need to resist the ugliness. If we each did, this would be a better reflection on Firefly and a more welcome place. I will try.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, January 15, 2013 2:34 PM

FREMDFIRMA


Not sure you comprehended what I meant - by buddy system I meant finding a specific indidivual to make friends with and eventually trust, who acts as secret-keeper and goalie with your express permission to respond in certain ways if you go off the rails.

Hell, I have a *couple* of them, although far less necessary these days, cause not so very long ago the volitile combination of bad temper, stress and a penchant for violence made it all but necessary for someone I would *not* clobber to be able to step between me and someone who was gonna get mangled - but there's also one who has the hard call to make should I go completely off my rocker in a fashion dangerous to everyone in sight.

Casey, one of Augustus's boys, has a "light" version of this cause he tends to run off at the mouth, and Jerome's the guy who dope slaps him whenever he says something especially stupid or offensive.

-F

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, January 15, 2013 2:43 PM

RIONAEIRE

Beir bua agus beannacht


I know Kira is utterly rambunctious, but I didn't know she has mental health/brain differences. Is she still doing sports/track at school?

Niki, I understand what you're saying, and I'd be okay with that for awhile, but I don't think its fair to keep someone on a danger list forever. I know that, unless you have a single episode and then cure, you're not going to stop having mental illness, it is always going to be there somewhere, whether you're in remission, doing well, mannaging or still struggling. I've only known one person who supposedly cured after having it for ten years as an adult but I honestly don't really believe her, because she's got to be one in a zillion, plus she pisses me off and I don't like her. Anyways that being said mental illness will always be around the corner and present, but I don't think its fair to keep someone on a list that people can look up and judge them for forever. I understand though that this is a tough issue and I understand where you're coming from. I'm just worried about some of the stuff that Frem talks about regarding the potential dangers of a danger list.

Worth noting though is that kids _can grow out of mental health differences, they certainly don't always but it can happen and every parent with a kiddo who has one is hoping to goodness that their family lucks out and their kid is one of those lucky ones who grows out of it. Or sometimes they grow out of some of it and then some of it stays, or sometimes it morphs in form. Etc.


"A completely coherant River means writers don't deliver" KatTaya

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, January 16, 2013 3:50 AM

FREMDFIRMA



No Riona, Kira is just... well, that's HOW she is, rambunctious with a short attention span.
She knows it and accounts for it as best she can - but she really does need a minder or something, which doesn't offend HER one bit, it just bugs me a little since she shows no signs of growing out of it, like... ever.
*laugh*
I am picturing in the future, some poor bastard standing at the altar wondering where she's got off to.


Brenda:
Quote:

I remember the blame started being laid on tv back when I was a child then in high school it became movies and video games. As an young adult it became music's fault for the violence in society.

And before that it was comic books...

Quote:

On another note mental illness isn't the only thing that people don't understand. Say the word seizure and you can get similar reactions. I was talking to someone I know, just an acquantance and I mentioned that I experience seizures. This person backed away from me. Like I was going to have one right in front of her.

Yeah, that stigmata BS is annoying, similar issues with the disabled - I'm in a WHEELCHAIR, means my leg isn't workin so well today, not that I am stupid or can't hear, ugh!

Of course my method of dealing with it is just assuming EVERYONE has "issues" even if they're not readily apparent, which is prolly not too far from true.

-F

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, January 16, 2013 7:47 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Riona, we're not that far apart. And yes, tho' "cure" is the wrong word, when it comes to bipolarity, one CAN cease to have the affliction; it only happens in older age, but it's scientifically proven. One can also go from being Bipolar I to Bipolar II, and from Bipolar to Unipolar (depressive)--and vice versa. But yes, it's a tough issue, and everyone has their own opinion--opinions which can change with circumstances and experiences, no doubt. As to children, I'd best not get started on misdiagnosis and over-diagnosis, or I'll quickly get beyond PG status!

Brenda, yeah; I, too, have heard the "violent ____ causes violence" thing over and over. I'm sure some of it is valid, but to me it's a strawman grasped to distract from the issue of guns themselves.
Quote:

Your legislators talk a good game about control lobbyists but no one wants to do anything because of the money they give to get people elected and reelected.

Bear in mind that it's more than that. Quick explanation (as quick as my verbosity allows!): The party that wins in states gets to draw the lines on what districts will be represented by whom. Republicans won in many states in 2010; they drew the districts so that they created "safe" districts for Republicans (districts with high Republican turnout). Ergo, the way things are now, Republican legislators are loath to seem even SLIGHTLY moderate or (gawd forbid) LEFT, because they could well end up being challenged by someone even MORE right in their primary. The SEAT is safely Republican, but WHICH Republican holds it is the question. That has every bit as much, if not more, to do with it than the money the NRA contributes or their lobbyists. It's a ridiculous situation and directly counter to the founders' idea of democracy, but it was a savvy move by the GOP and now we're stuck with it.

Oh, my, now you're getting into my territory with seizures. That sickens me as much as the stigma of mental illness, and to a degree it's been around longer (because many mental illnesses weren't recognized until recently, and others just hidden away). We're often told, and tell those who are newly diagnosed, to try to think of ourselves a having epilepsy; we didn't ask for it; we can't get rid of it; we can do everything we can to avoid it (in the case of seizures, some of the same symptom-management techniques like meds and avoiding triggers); but it's going to happen some time. Ergo, not to feel guilty about it and to just do what we can and not take it personally. We differ in that when we have an episode, we need to also learn from the episode and incorporate what we learn into our symptom management if possible, but the not-taking-it-personally thing is pretty tough to internalize, especially when people react the way they do! You have my deepest sympathy, believe me.

And yes, one way to try and deal with it is to remember that everyone has issues--which ISN'T that far from the truth. I often say that if psychiatry continues the way it's going, they will find a "mental illness" for everyone. Plus, some of the worst of what I would call "mentally ill" are people who are undiagnosed (who often have the most stigma against epileptics, the mentally ill and the disabled...or anyone who behaves outside what they consider the "norm"; some because it hasn't been serious enough to seek treatment; some because their words/actions are caused by something else (like upbringing); some because they're just plain assholes!

Frem, "stigma" is not "stigmata". The two terms are not interchangeable, in any way.

Tit for tat got us where we are today. If we want to be grownups, we need to resist the ugliness. If we each did, this would be a better reflection on Firefly and a more welcome place. I will try.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, January 16, 2013 8:24 AM

BYTEMITE


Well... I think not ending up on a list is pertinent as well, more than a question of choice (owning guns) or born with it (mental illness).

The problem with a list of gunowners is that the most dangerous people will be the people with guns who aren't on the list, and the second problem is that such lists have been an accuse for broadscale confiscation before, as in New Orleans.

I'm kinda with Frem on that one. Increase regs if you haveta, I don't even understand those anyway, but lists are bad ideas and kinda scary.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, January 16, 2013 8:56 AM

RIONAEIRE

Beir bua agus beannacht


Maybe Kira has ADD. I try not to diagnose people I've heard about second hand online though because its kind of obnoxious when people do that. Either way I think she'll improve as she gets older, it just might be taking her a little longer than other rambunctious kids. If she can't stay put though and wanders away that tells me that maybe there are some differences there that might be worth looking at. Hey, how is archery coming? You said you got her a practice bow because you knew she'd want one after watching Brave last year.

Hi Niki, I do know that some people do better when they get old, but I agree, I like the term remission better than cure, because cure lacks accuracy. Of course if we're talking about a single episode event then for some people cure does happen, lucky sods (envious in this corner). I think that woman who claims she was sick for ten years and then cured might be lying or exaggerating how sick she was in order to put forth an agenda. Either that or what she had morphed into ADD instead (things can alter/morph into other things, and ADD is better than what she claims she used to have). She has the shortest attention span of any adult I know, she puts my best friend Mary (who does have ADD) to shame. :)

Hi Brenda, so I heard that in the states, where I am, they only make flaurescent lights now, and my friend who has seizures is having a hard time with that because they flicker (I can't see it but she can). Now granted they aren't bright white and obnoxious like the ones at the grocery store, but they're in that ... frequency or whatever its called. Do you have trouble with those?

People are so weird about disabilities, they think they can catch them, sneeze! :(

"A completely coherant River means writers don't deliver" KatTaya

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, January 16, 2013 9:17 AM

BYTEMITE


Ugh fluorescent lights... The only good thing about fluorescent lights is they make kind of the same noise as the aurora borealis. Every flicker of them is cringe-inducing.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, January 16, 2013 12:14 PM

FREMDFIRMA


Quote:

Originally posted by Niki2:
Frem, "stigma" is not "stigmata". The two terms are not interchangeable, in any way.


Heh, I meant to type Stigma, but info noted.
(And had to re-edit it AGAIN, it's like my brain fries when I try to type it!)

Riona, it's not - Kira has a really good pediatrician, whom I am thinking of suggesting to my ex, who hasn't thought this whole baby thing through nearly as much she shoulda, and he actually went through the whole battery including time-observed behavioral tests (they have really good insurance through her fathers work), there is quite literally nothing "wrong" with her, it's just that she falls in at an extreme of normal human behavior, is all.

Me, I hate this damn chair, bitterly - I hate the cripple sticks (crutches) even worse because you can't USE YOUR HANDS, and that makes me feel so annoyingly helpless....
I do think all wheelchairs ought to come with an electrified shock prod bumper though, given the conduct of some people, meh.

-Frem

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, January 16, 2013 12:59 PM

RIONAEIRE

Beir bua agus beannacht


Maybe Kira's wandering away tendency is just her not thinking about her actions and how they affect herself and others. Irresponsability. Lots of teens are irresponsable and they generally grow out of it as they get more obligations in life they need to fulfill. Plus she probably gets bored easily but if she's with someone else she has something to do that is interesting, not to mention if she's with someone younger she might feel responsable for them so she sticks around. Obligations can be good. Does she have any pets? Sometimes people learn a lot from having to take care of something that depends on them for its needs.

People are so interesting, I love how everyone is different, it would suck if we were all the same all the time. Niki, I have to say I don't like the idea of "them coming up with a mental illness for everyone". If people are functioning fine, doing the things they need to do, succeeding in their relationships and the obligations of life and meeting their goals then why would we want to label them? Its only when those things are altered that it makes sense to look at the idea, and then do it systematically and not rush. I know you so I don't think you really meant that, I think you were just talking off handedly.

"A completely coherant River means writers don't deliver" KatTaya

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, January 16, 2013 2:09 PM

BYTEMITE


I'm between both of you, I think everyone actually IS crazy and could snap at a moments notice under the right circumstances, but at the same time I don't think we should be diagnosing basic human behaviour.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, January 16, 2013 3:53 PM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

Originally posted by BYTEMITE:
I'm between both of you, I think everyone actually IS crazy and could snap at a moments notice under the right circumstances, but at the same time I don't think we should be diagnosing basic human behaviour.

To quote Darkness from the movie "Legend", We are all animals, Milady.
And as such, all prone to unpredictable behaviour given the right psychological 'push'.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, January 16, 2013 4:11 PM

RIONAEIRE

Beir bua agus beannacht


Well Firefly, being not too fancy in the special effects department, sounds like your speed, :)))) Give it a go. :)))))

It is our very favorite show ;)

I bet Serenity was harder for you though because its bigger budget so had more fancy effects. I get kind of confused if there is too much action in a movie and not enough talking, so movies that are all flash and CGI don't really appeal to me, they're overrated.

Its good you don't have trouble with lights. The light above my desk at work flickers so I'm told, it looks normal to me, though a bit inferior. But when Holly comes into the office I turn it off because she can't do flickery lights or else she will have one of those classic fall on the ground ones.

"A completely coherant River means writers don't deliver" KatTaya

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, January 16, 2013 8:10 PM

RIONAEIRE

Beir bua agus beannacht


Crap Brenda, your fiance died? I'm so sorry, that's really sad.

Do you have the kind where you go away for a little bit and then come back but it isn't obvious unless someone is watching you and sees the missing bit?

"A completely coherant River means writers don't deliver" KatTaya

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, January 17, 2013 8:42 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Oh, my again, Brenda:
Quote:

I've dealt with seizures off and on for almost 23years and reactions like that just frustrate me. They are talking to me and can see that I am perfectly coherent and stuff but say that word and all bets are off.

Been there, experienced THAT when I say I'm bipolar, too! Not very often, thankfully, but then in California ignorance about mental illness isn't as rampant as in many other places, and California is pretty famous (infamous) for it's tolerance. There's good and bad to that, but from the intolerance I see just HERE, I'll take where I live, thank you!

And yes, I put it down to ignorance or the other person's issues; it doesn't bother me that much and if it does, only momentarily. Here it's so rare that it surprises me, also only momentarily.

Riona, I was partly joking.
Quote:

People are so interesting, I love how everyone is different, it would suck if we were all the same all the time.

Me, too; I'm fascinated by the human brain, and the differences are awesome. As to coming up with a mental illness for everyone, do always bear in mind that, for a mental illness to be diagnosed as such, the DSM makes it very clear that "the cognitive deficits must be sufficient to interfere with functional independence". They're very strict about that, tho' yes, misdiagnosis and over-diagnosis exists nonetheless.

Tit for tat got us where we are today. If we want to be grownups, we need to resist the ugliness. If we each did, this would be a better reflection on Firefly and a more welcome place. I will try.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
What kind of superpower could China be?
Tue, November 5, 2024 16:02 - 54 posts
End of the Democratic Party (not kidding)
Tue, November 5, 2024 14:18 - 56 posts
Disgruntled Tepublicans vow to move to Australia
Tue, November 5, 2024 13:53 - 76 posts
Kamala Harris for President
Tue, November 5, 2024 13:47 - 639 posts
Elections; 2024
Tue, November 5, 2024 13:44 - 4515 posts
The kids are the ones who will remember...
Tue, November 5, 2024 13:42 - 5 posts
A thread for Democrats Only
Tue, November 5, 2024 13:32 - 6920 posts
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Tue, November 5, 2024 13:15 - 4676 posts
Now we get everything we ever wanted! It's a Celebration!!!!
Tue, November 5, 2024 13:11 - 3 posts
Mid-Term Elections 2022. Hey Jack, I Was Right
Tue, November 5, 2024 13:08 - 412 posts
Oh well
Tue, November 5, 2024 13:06 - 29 posts
Are You- Democrat or Republican
Tue, November 5, 2024 13:04 - 55 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL