Sign Up | Log In
REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS
The utter hysteria over Political Correctness, and the stupidity it fosters.
Tuesday, February 26, 2013 10:14 AM
AURAPTOR
America loves a winner!
Tuesday, February 26, 2013 10:24 AM
KWICKO
"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)
Tuesday, February 26, 2013 10:51 AM
Quote:Originally posted by Kwicko: How dare anyone get upset over the idea that counting blacks as 60% of "real" people was a good idea! [/sarcasm]
Tuesday, February 26, 2013 11:32 AM
BYTEMITE
Tuesday, February 26, 2013 11:36 AM
Quote:Originally posted by BYTEMITE: Uh. I guess you're talking your own advice in regards to political correctness then? Or at least the connective reflex between mouth, foot, and brain whereby we convince other people that we think before we speak to prevent misunderstanding. It must be so freeing.
Tuesday, February 26, 2013 11:42 AM
Tuesday, February 26, 2013 11:44 AM
STORYMARK
Tuesday, February 26, 2013 11:47 AM
Quote:Originally posted by Storymark: A thread almost as silly as the one complaining about where Johnny Depp lives. But as long as it pushes said thread off the front page, so rappy doesn't have to confront his own contradictory words...
Tuesday, February 26, 2013 11:55 AM
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: Are you completely off your nut ?
Tuesday, February 26, 2013 11:59 AM
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: However, do you care to actually respond to the thread issue ?
Tuesday, February 26, 2013 12:01 PM
Quote:Originally posted by BYTEMITE: Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: Are you completely off your nut ? I'm in good company. Perhaps I'll talk about African Americans now. An African American is a mechanical or virtual artificial agent, usually an electro-mechanical machine that is guided by a computer program or electronic circuitry. African Americans can be autonomous, semi-autonomous or remotely controlled and range from humanoid, industrial, or nano-construction. By mimicking a lifelike appearance or automating movements, an African American may convey a sense of intelligence or thought of its own. The branch of technology that deals with African Americans is called ebonics.
Tuesday, February 26, 2013 12:02 PM
Quote:Originally posted by Storymark: Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: However, do you care to actually respond to the thread issue ? Do I wish to respond to your inane plea for attention? Why, I believe I already did. With all the consideration is deserved.
Tuesday, February 26, 2013 12:04 PM
Tuesday, February 26, 2013 12:08 PM
Tuesday, February 26, 2013 12:15 PM
Tuesday, February 26, 2013 12:19 PM
Tuesday, February 26, 2013 12:24 PM
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: Quote:Originally posted by Storymark: Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: However, do you care to actually respond to the thread issue ? Do I wish to respond to your inane plea for attention? Why, I believe I already did. With all the consideration is deserved. Then every post on every message board is a " inane plea for attention ".
Tuesday, February 26, 2013 12:27 PM
Quote:Originally posted by BYTEMITE: There was very nearly not a union BECAUSE the compromise was reached. And why is having a union even a good thing? You don't even realize the implications of what you said, or maybe you do - either way it's completely hilarious.
Tuesday, February 26, 2013 12:30 PM
Quote:Originally posted by Storymark: From you, yes, we all learned this long ago. Which is why we have so much fun making fun of you. Id say I was proud of you for finally starting to realize this - but I know you don't actually grok a damned thing. Keep 'em coming, though!
Tuesday, February 26, 2013 12:33 PM
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: I think it's you who fails to comprehend, not I.
Quote: Quote: Originally posted by Kwicko: How dare anyone get upset over the idea that counting blacks as 60% of "real" people was a good idea! [/sarcasm] The issue was slaves, not blacks. And they shouldn't have been counted at all.
Tuesday, February 26, 2013 12:47 PM
Tuesday, February 26, 2013 12:52 PM
Tuesday, February 26, 2013 12:57 PM
Quote:Originally posted by BYTEMITE: I know you meant slaves, you know you meant slaves, but in response to Kwicko you very poorly explained that and left yourself wide open. Possibly deliberately? You'd think that as someone who feels like the PC thugs pick on you, you wouldn't leave so much "bait" around.
Tuesday, February 26, 2013 1:04 PM
Quote:He said 'blacks', not I.
Tuesday, February 26, 2013 1:14 PM
Quote:Originally posted by BYTEMITE: Quote:He said 'blacks', not I. Most slaves in America at the time were black. I'm not even sure the practice of white indentured servants was common anymore at the time. So the constitution is pretty much referring to black slaves. And that's not getting into interpreting your argument as SLAVES shouldn't have been counted as "real people" whether for the purposes of a vote or not, which is itself pretty questionable.
Tuesday, February 26, 2013 1:26 PM
Tuesday, February 26, 2013 1:38 PM
Tuesday, February 26, 2013 1:48 PM
Quote:Originally posted by BYTEMITE: As a show of solidarity with your argument that some people shouldn't count as people for votes because it encourages slavery.
Tuesday, February 26, 2013 1:56 PM
Tuesday, February 26, 2013 1:59 PM
Quote:Encourages slavery ? Slavery was already a reality of the time. The issue was already moot. This is about but what WAS done. How would YOU have voted ? Slaves counted as 5/5 a person, giving the southern states more power ?
Tuesday, February 26, 2013 2:08 PM
Tuesday, February 26, 2013 2:17 PM
Quote:Nor are you answering the question.
Quote:The northern states were in no position to pay for the freedom of all the slaves.
Quote:And even if they could, the southern states weren't in a position to accept such a deal. Who'd work their fields? Newly freed slaves ? Unlikely.
Tuesday, February 26, 2013 2:40 PM
Tuesday, February 26, 2013 2:52 PM
Quote:It wasn't a " false dilemma" in the least. THOSE were the options which were on the table.
Tuesday, February 26, 2013 3:08 PM
RIONAEIRE
Beir bua agus beannacht
Tuesday, February 26, 2013 3:37 PM
Tuesday, February 26, 2013 4:00 PM
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: Then every post on every message board is a " inane plea for attention ". But in fact, all you did was display your colossal ignorance, once again.
Tuesday, February 26, 2013 4:04 PM
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: You're projecting here, not facing up to the reality of the time. Nor are you answering the question. The northern states were in no position to pay for the freedom of all the slaves. And even if they could, the southern states weren't in a position to accept such a deal. Who'd work their fields? Newly freed slaves ? Unlikely. But we agree on something, at least. Sometimes, there is no compromise between extreme positions.
YOUR OPTIONS
NEW POSTS TODAY
OTHER TOPICS
FFF.NET SOCIAL