Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:
Hey Rue (comrade Kiki). First, yea America. Sorry you don’t practice this level of law in Russia. Hey, maybe someday. Here we celebrate the rule of law despite the protests of trolls. Here, unlike Russia, wrong doings that are uncovered are dealt with. Here, if enough evidence isn't uncovered to prove guilt beyond a shadow of a doubt, then that too is recognized. This happens regardless of our personal opinions. Again, yea America.

Robert Mueller’s mandate was very narrow. What if anything did Russia do during the campaign. Then, because of their behaviors, Trump and others working within his campaign with deep Russian ties, forced Mueller’s mandate to be expanded. He indicted 34 to 37 individuals. Six, seven whatever from within Trumps campaign. Also Indicted were thirteen Russians, three Russian companies. The level of detail Mueller presented in these indictments was astounding. All guilty beyond a shadow of a doubt.

That was the standard he used to determine if he could prove a Trump Russia conspiracy. He could not. However, we as a nation saw colluding for ourselves in Trumps behavior, plus Congress isn’t so restricted. The American people’s opinions are not so restricted either. Collusion will still be decided at the polls. It’s not a done deal.

Mueller stated in his report that he could not discount Trump obstructed justice. Further, if Mueller decided not to indict because of the Justice Department’s policy not to indict a sitting president, but felt Trump did commit obstruction, that is how he would proceed. His stating he could not discount obstruction puts the decision squarely in the hands of Congress. Mueller knows this. Barr showed poor judgement to say the least, deciding no obstruction occurred after only after a few hours reading Mueller’s report, when Mueller wouldn’t do it after investigating it for two years.

And thanks comrade Kiki. Thanks for re-posting some of my posts. After rereading them I was pleased to see that I showed such good judgement from beginning to current. It must be terrible for you seeing America shine while Russia fails so miserably.

Tick tock comrade

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Hey Dems ! Hey Antifa clowns !!

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Nice asinine post SECOND.

We have a SYSTEMS problem, not a "morals" one. Try thinking about that for a change.

My god, but you're stupid. And a liar. But most of all, you're religious: You have your delusions and nothing will shake them from you. So "thinking" ... for you? Not an option!

---

In the past, I didn't wait for the Vietnamese legal system to solve a dilemma I faced. I solved it all by myself with a machine gun. I did not wait years for an investigation to start or a final report. And there was no appeals process. If God or Karma disagreed with my decision, both are taking their time to let me know how they feel. But I feel that I permanently smoothed out a problem and I take pride in being effective and decisive. There were no unexpected consequences, unlike here:
https://warwick.ac.uk/newsandevents/features/indira-gandhi-assassinati
on/

I'm not going to smooth out the problem of Trump because if he gets reelected, I am guaranteed more tax cuts: "The government set a record with a $234 billion deficit in February"
www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/the-government-ran-a-544-billi
on-deficit-over-the-first-5-months-of-the-fiscal-year/2019/03/22/932d3438-4cc8-11e9-9663-00ac73f49662_story.html

Quote:

---

The government spent $234 billion more than it brought in through tax receipts last month, much more than the deficit levels hit during the global financial crisis.

---

President Mike Pence would not be irresponsible like Trump nor as helpful to the rich.

I won't vote for Trump, but I hope Donald J Trump gives himself and me many more tax cuts.

---

Quote:

---

Nice asinine post SECOND.
We have a SYSTEMS problem, not a "morals" one. Try thinking about that for a change.
My god, but you're stupid. And a liar. But most of all, you're religious: You have your delusions and nothing will shake them from you. So "thinking" ... for you? Not an option!



- SIGNY

In the past, I didn't wait for the Vietnamese legal system to solve a dilemma I faced. I solved it all by myself with a machine gun. I did not wait years for an investigation to start or a final report. And there was no appeals process. If God or Karma disagreed with my decision, both are taking their time to let me know how they feel. But I feel that I permanently smoothed out a problem and I take pride in being effective and decisive.

---

Quote:

---

There were no unexpected consequences, ...

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by reaverfan:
Do your vodka dance.

We have a short memo from an AG who was hired specifically to do what he does best: Cover for crooks.

It's far from over, so enjoy your little PR victory. The facts are not out.

---

Agreed, when a prosecutor says “the investigation did not establish” an offense, that is not to say the crime wasn’t committed or that there was not evidence supporting it. It means that there was not sufficient proof of conspiracy or coordination to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt.

We need to see the report, tick tock

T

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
tsk tsk SECOND, not only have you shown yourself to be biased to the point of delusion, hate-filled, an overall liar and a defamer, are you now advocating that we all pick up machine guns and assassinate politicians that we don't like?

Hmm... maybe somebody should tell the Secret Service about you.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by reaverfan:
Do your vodka dance.

We have a short memo from an AG who was hired specifically to do what he does best: Cover for crooks.

It's far from over, so enjoy your little PR victory. The facts are not out.

---

Agreed, when a prosecutor says “the investigation did not establish” an offense, that is not to say the crime wasn’t committed or that there was not evidence supporting it. It means that there was not sufficient proof of conspiracy or coordination to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt.

We need to see the report, tick tock

---

Mueller released the report. We've yet to see what's in it.

tick tock

T

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
tsk tsk SECOND, not only have you shown yourself to be biased to the point of delusion, hate-filled, an overall liar and a defamer, are you now advocating that we all pick up machine guns and assassinate politicians that we don't like?

Hmm... maybe somebody should tell the Secret Service about you.

---

Signym, you won't call the Secret Service or your lawyer. You and Trump are all empty talk and play-acting. I figured you'd be an ass about Vietnam, same as Trump would. It was only last week Trump was bitching about John McCain's war record, inflating himself. Mr. Trump did not go to the Vietnam war. He has a consistent record about all wars, being for them, but if America loses he says he was always against.
www.factcheck.org/2016/02/donald-trump-and-the-iraq-war/
www.nbcnews.com/feature/show-me/video/despite-his-claims-donald-trump-
did-initially-support-the-iraq-war-760660547760
www.latimes.com/nation/politics/trailguide/la-na-second-presidential-d
ebate-live-trump-says-he-opposed-iraq-war-from-the-1476065104-htmlstory.html

On Sunday, Barr delivered to Congress a four-page letter characterizing Mueller’s report but leaving much to the imagination. Mueller went to church across the street from the White House and said nothing. Based on Barr’s letter, Trump and his team gleefully claimed, without any apparent fear of response from Mueller, “total and complete exoneration,” even though Mueller’s report, according to Barr’s own terse summary, explicitly said that the finding “does not exonerate” Trump.

It didn’t have to go down like this. Instead of remaining silent and secretive for almost two years, Mueller and his prosecutorial team could have acted more like the Justice Department itself does in ordinary times, holding press conferences and briefing reporters on background, explaining their decisions to indict and not indict and helping us all understand what was going on in this tense, intense investigation that goes to the very heart of how we govern ourselves and protect our electoral system. Mueller could have, and should have, stood before reporters and the American people to announce and explain his conclusions so we could all consider and debate their validity.

Prior investigations of presidents, by independent counsels Lawrence Walsh and Kenneth Starr, for example, who were criticized for their many public statements and voluminous public reports, may have caused Mueller to take his silent man approach, but he went too far. We needed to hear from him. We needed him to tell us what we could expect and fear, what was true and what was imagined as things unfolded in real time. As the Supreme Court said many years ago, “People in an open society do not demand infallibility from their institutions, but it is difficult for them to accept what they are prohibited from observing.”

It is not too late. We need to see the full Mueller report as soon as possible and hear from Mueller himself as to what led him to his conclusions and why he reached them.

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2019/03/mueller-report-william-bar
r-donald-trump.html

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:

So SECOND, basically, since you didn't deny advocating assassination, am I to assume that you're for it?

---

Quote:

---

So SECOND, basically, since you didn't deny advocating assassination, am I to assume that you're for it? - SIGNY

For fat motherfucking Trump? Either that or speed up the justice system by a factor of 10. - SECOND

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:
Second, at times you make it hard to believe you are stable and successful. Calling for the assassination of the president suggests you aren't as balanced as I had hoped. Perhaps it was just a laps in judgement.



T

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:
Second, at times you make it hard to believe you are stable and successful. Calling for the assassination of the president suggests you aren't as balanced as I had hoped. Perhaps it was just a laps in judgement.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:
Second, at times you make it hard to believe you are stable and successful. Calling for the assassination of the president suggests you aren't as balanced as I had hoped. Perhaps it was just a laps in judgement.

---

I don't recall anyone being upset when Trump called a drone strike during an evening meal to impress Xi Jinping. Trump killed 9 civilians. Perhaps it was only entertainment and no reason to call into question fathead Trump's judgement. The confirmation that Trump killed the wrong people came only later, well after Trump and Xi forgot all the details, other than how much fun they had overeating and laughing.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:
Second, at times you make it hard to believe you are stable and successful. Calling for the assassination of the president suggests you aren't as balanced as I had hoped. Perhaps it was just a laps in judgement.

---

I don't recall anyone being upset when Trump called a drone strike during an evening meal to impress Xi Jinping. Trump killed 9 civilians. Perhaps it was only entertainment and no reason to call into question fathead Trump's judgement. The confirmation that Trump killed the wrong people came only later, well after Trump and Xi forgot all the details, other than how much fun they had overeating and laughing.

---

Don't try that shit. Blaming drone strikes or wars or coups on one President or ideological side is something we do when comparing what big pieces of evil shit all of them are... cause they all have done it or are currently doing it.



Using that to justify your somewhat frequently expressed desire to assassinate the president, and the violent fantasy you have of being the "hero" that did it isn't going to fly with anyone here, except for maybe Marcos.



Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by captaincrunch:
Not yet substantiated, but...

"Graham says Barr told him it would likely take “weeks not months” to get a version of the Mueller report viewable by the public. Said they will pass through the WH to see if they want to make redactions under executive privilege."

So if true, sterilize it completely and then release. Why am I not surprised?

---

Congress needs to bypass Barr as much as possible. They need to get Mueller to testify if they can.

T

Quote:

---

As the MSM pretends we all have goldfish brains and can't remember that they spent the last two years convicting Donald Trump in the court of public opinion, the New York Post is out with "Mueller Madness" brackets to determine who in the media takes the cake for the peddling the most fiction.

The president’s haters no doubt wish to memory-hole collusion and move on to the next anti-Trump theory. But not so fast: We want to laurel the punditry “champion” — the one who peddled the most nonsensical nonsense, the wildest inanities, the weirdest theories and unsubstantiated stories.

That’s where your brackets come in.

Our contenders are divided into four groups (not unlike NCAA conferences): the print journalists, the cable TV talkers, the Twitterati and the network news reporters and “analysts.” And the brackets are seeded, with the most visible and influential figures contending against the lesser-known.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by rue:

I was right to stay away, wrong to let my curiosity get the better of me.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by rue:
I was right to stay away, wrong to let my curiosity get the better of me.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:
Please don't pay attention to Trump accusing Democrats of treason, a crime for which they can be executed.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:
Please don't pay attention to Trump accusing Democrats of treason, a crime for which they can be executed.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Quote:

---

Originally posted:
Second, at times you make it hard to believe you are stable and successful. Calling for the assassination of the president suggests you aren't as balanced as I had hoped. Perhaps it was just a laps in judgement.

T

---

If I were a smaller man, I'd make that my signature on every post going forward.

But I'll just choose to quote this for posterity.


Hey T. It's not as if Second hasn't said this on quite a few occasions before, and in a much more violent and graphic explanation of what he would do and how he would do it, given his status in life.

You must have missed those. Glad you didn't miss this one.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:

Quote:

---

Originally posted:
Second, at times you make it hard to believe you are stable and successful. Calling for the assassination of the president suggests you aren't as balanced as I had hoped. Perhaps it was just a laps in judgement.

---

I don't recall anyone being upset when Trump called a drone strike during an evening meal to impress Xi Jinping. Trump killed 9 civilians. Perhaps it was only entertainment and no reason to call into question fathead Trump's judgement. The confirmation that Trump killed the wrong people came only later, well after Trump and Xi forgot all the details, other than how much fun they had overeating and laughing.

---

Don't try that shit. Blaming drone strikes or wars or coups on one President or ideological side is something we do when comparing what big pieces of evil shit all of them are... cause they all have done it or are currently doing it.

Using that to justify your somewhat frequently expressed desire to assassinate the president, and the violent fantasy you have of being the "hero" that did it isn't going to fly with anyone here, except for maybe Marcos.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

Look, 6ix, you fucking moron, most of those deaths of civilians can be blamed on irresponsible military officers, not the President. But Trump has actually given orders that can only end in murdering civilians. Then he covers it up.
http://fortune.com/2019/03/06/trump-drones-report-civilian-deaths/
www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-cancels-obama-policy-repor
ting-drone-strike-deaths-n980156

Getting back to the Mueller Investigation, Trump said he was "exonerated". Barr said very clearly Trump was "not exonerated". Trump has been corrected, but he keeps going back to saying not exonerated. Trump has no conscience about lying about this or civilian deaths or anything.
www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/03/william-barr-mueller-report-
tk/585709/

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:

Quote:

---

As the MSM pretends we all have goldfish brains and can't remember that they spent the last two years convicting Donald Trump in the court of public opinion, the New York Post is out with "Mueller Madness" brackets to determine who in the media takes the cake for the peddling the most fiction.

The president’s haters no doubt wish to memory-hole collusion and move on to the next anti-Trump theory. But not so fast: We want to laurel the punditry “champion” — the one who peddled the most nonsensical nonsense, the wildest inanities, the weirdest theories and unsubstantiated stories.

That’s where your brackets come in.

Our contenders are divided into four groups (not unlike NCAA conferences): the print journalists, the cable TV talkers, the Twitterati and the network news reporters and “analysts.” And the brackets are seeded, with the most visible and influential figures contending against the lesser-known.

---

---

Quote:

---

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:
Please don't pay attention to Trump accusing Democrats of treason, a crime for which they can be executed.

---

Despite how many times that very word was used to describe Trump, nobody paid attention to anybody in these very forums that said it.

You Democrats are on a roll. First racist, nazi and misogynist. Now you might actually have stripped the word treason of any of its meaning as well.

Congrats on destroying public discourse, right down to the very definition of the words we speak.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:
Please don't pay attention to Trump accusing Democrats of treason, a crime for which they can be executed.

---

Despite how many times that very word was used to describe Trump, nobody paid attention to anybody in these very forums that said it.

You Democrats are on a roll. First racist, nazi and misogynist. Now you might actually have stripped the word treason of any of its meaning as well.

Congrats on destroying public discourse, right down to the very definition of the words we speak.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

Quote:

---

I take that as a "yes".

Please note that I asked you to clarify your post - unlike you, GSTRING, THUGR, and "SHINY" "GOOD" GUY, who insist on telling everyone else what these others said and what they "really" mean.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
I refuse to take a ride on Second's crazy train here.

Besides, there's nothing more to say that JSF hasn't said after my piece.

Have fun with your impeachment, losers.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
It's sufficient here, Second. Those four replies are all your post diarrhea even warrants.

There's no reason for me to even bother posting anything eloquent to shut your stupid ass up. Intelligent replies are lost on you. At the end of the day, as you've said quite a few times yourself, you're only posting to hear yourself talk anyhow.

Enjoy 6 more years of Trump, idiots.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:

So.. I take it that Stephen Colbert didn't take a solemn moment and address the audience about his vulgar comment regarding Trump, Putin and on being a certain type of ' holster ' ??

No groveling on hands and knees , begging for forgiveness, and then excuse himself from the show for a week, or two, as he sits in time out , contemplating the error of this ways and rush to judgment ??

None of that ??

But instead, he and his staff chose to come up w/ this silly video, in full denial of the facts ?

Interesting.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:
Colbert sends an apology for being wrong:
video

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Colbert can stick his apology up his own cock holster.

Then he can sit and spin on it.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by captaincrunch:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:
Colbert sends an apology for being wrong:
video

---

Hilarious.

---