"Avengers" Super Bowl ad by whozit

CINEMA

"Avengers" Super Bowl ad

scan this with your smart phone to obtain URL for this page

POSTED BY: WHOZIT
UPDATED: Wednesday, February 29, 2012 10:00
SHORT URL: http://bit.ly/zHEjDw
VIEWED: 6692
PAGE 1 of 1

Wednesday, February 1, 2012 1:20 PM

WHOZIT

http://www.deadline.com/2012/02/super-bowl-sneak-peek-the-avengers

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Wednesday, February 1, 2012 1:42 PM

WHOZIT

GO GIANTS!! Patriots suck..and are stupid..and ugly..and smell like

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Wednesday, February 1, 2012 2:51 PM

RIONAEIRE

Beir bua agus beannacht

Once I found out Thor is in the Avengers I got way more interested. :)

"A completely coherant River means writers don't deliver" KatTaya

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, February 2, 2012 12:08 AM

LWAVES

Quote:
Originally posted by RionaEire:
Once I found out Thor is in the Avengers I got way more interested. :)

"A completely coherant River means writers don't deliver" KatTaya

Do you mean Thor, or a certain Mr. Chris Hemsworth?

The footage is too short to really judge anything but most of the 7 comments under it seem to have written it off already. Stupid

.
Plus, to my knowledge, director's don't make the teasers and trailers - the studios do. In much the same way the record companies usually select the running order of an album and which singles are released.

It's Joss, so I'm there anyway plus I liked all the films that link into this one so it's a must-see film for me.

"The greatest invention ever is not the wheel. It's the second wheel." - Rich Hall

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, February 2, 2012 7:26 AM

OPPYH

I heard some serious spoilers.
Not sure how accurate the rumor is(I thought this was leak proof!) but if it is indeed accurate the story is...WOW!

Lets just say if it turns out to be such, Joss will have single handedly made THE ULTIMATE MARVEL MOVIE.
I am now more excited than every other super hero movie I ever anticipated combined.

----------------------------------------------------------------

70's TV FOREVER

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, February 2, 2012 8:43 AM

STORYMARK

Such as??

There have been a lot of BS "spoilers" via pure speculation, but little legit info has come out, just yet.

"Goram it kid, let's frak this thing and go home! Engage!"

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, February 2, 2012 9:21 AM

OPPYH

Quote:
Originally posted by Storymark:
Such as??

There have been a lot of BS "spoilers" via pure speculation, but little legit info has come out, just yet.

Probably is BS. Don't hold much stock in it, but it does sound pretty good.

WARNING POSSIBLE SPOILERS:

----------------------------------------------------------------

70's TV FOREVER

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, February 2, 2012 9:45 AM

STORYMARK

Well, at the very least, both Marvel and Hugo Weaving have said the Red Skull will not be in the movie.

The stuff about Thanos is a possibility, and has been long rumored - but I doubt he'll be as big an aspect of the story as they say here - more likely just a cameo, setting him up as the villain for Avengers 2.

"Goram it kid, let's frak this thing and go home! Engage!"

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, February 2, 2012 10:18 AM

OPPYH

The budget has me a little worried. $220 (according to IMDB) mil. Not that I don't think it won't make that much back, but at that price things could get a little iffy on the returns. I'm not sure of what Paramount expects, but if I rememmber correctly Superman Returns from WB was upward of $200 million, and it did turn a profit but WB was not happy with how it performed at the Box Office.

Story,
Do you any info on what studios expect from a big blockbuster title like the Avengers? If they want to double their money they might be in for a shocker.

----------------------------------------------------------------

70's TV FOREVER

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, February 2, 2012 10:36 AM

STORYMARK

Quote:
Originally posted by OPPYH:
The budget has me a little worried. $220 (according to IMDB) mil. Not that I don't think it won't make that much back, but at that price things could get a little iffy on the returns. I'm not sure of what Paramount expects, but if I rememmber correctly Superman Returns from WB was upward of $200 million, and it did turn a profit but WB was not happy with how it performed at the Box Office.

Story,
Do you any info on what studios expect from a big blockbuster title like the Avengers? If they want to double their money they might be in for a shocker.

----------------------------------------------------------------

70's TV FOREVER

General rule of thumb is that a film needs to make at least twice its budget to be profitable. But even that is iffy on projects like this. For instance, they'll likely spend a lot more on advertising for this than most films, but it'll make more in ancilliaries (toys and such) than most flicks.

I wouldn't worry too much about that budget. It isn't super-huge, but it's not realy small, either. $440 million as a break-even isn't that hard to reach. Captain America is the lowest-grossing Marvel movie to date, and it made $368 million worldwide. Iron Man, the highest so far, brought in $585 million - and that was with lower ticket prices, and no 3D bump. Id expect Avengers to do at least $500 million internationally.

In the case of Superman Returns, the budget actually included 10 years worth of failed attepts to make the movie (under Tim Burton, McG and Brett Ratner).

With Avengers, they shot most of it here in New Mexico, and the rest in Ohio. In NM there is (or was at the time) a 25% rebate on anything they spend in the state, and Im assuming Ohio has a simmilar program. So that there probably knocks off 20-30 million at the least.

"Goram it kid, let's frak this thing and go home! Engage!"

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, February 2, 2012 1:33 PM

RIONAEIRE

Beir bua agus beannacht

I mean Thor, I guess the actor did a good job playing him, but anyone who talks old fashioned and has super powers from Asgard/Valhala and is nice will do thanks.

"A completely coherant River means writers don't deliver" KatTaya

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, February 2, 2012 1:41 PM

PHOENIXROSE

You think you know--what's to come, what you are. You haven't even begun.

Quote:
Originally posted by lwaves:
Quote:
Originally posted by RionaEire:
Once I found out Thor is in the Avengers I got way more interested. :)

Thor, or a certain Mr. Chris Hemsworth?

She might mean Thor, but I'd definitely see it for Chris Hemsworth and his hypnotic voice. Mmmmmmmm.

What reason had proved best ceased to look absurd to the eye, which shows how idle it is to think anything ridiculous except what is wrong.

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, February 3, 2012 8:10 AM

OPPYH

Quote:
Originally posted by Storymark:

I wouldn't worry too much about that budget. It isn't super-huge, but it's not realy small, either. $440 million as a break-even isn't that hard to reach. Captain America is the lowest-grossing Marvel movie to date, and it made $368 million worldwide. Iron Man, the highest so far, brought in $585 million - and that was with lower ticket prices, and no 3D bump. Id expect Avengers to do at least $500 million internationally.

Thanks for the info. I figure the release date in May is the optimum time for a summer movie. It will have sort of a jump start to the long list of summer movies, and generally audiences are eager to see the first "big" summer movie. I think you're right that it will do just fine at the box office. I'm not that big a fan of 3-D, but I plan on seeing it twice. Once for each format.

----------------------------------------------------------------

70's TV FOREVER

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, February 3, 2012 8:57 AM

PHOENIXROSE

You think you know--what's to come, what you are. You haven't even begun.

Quote:
Originally posted by OPPYH:
I'm not that big a fan of 3-D, but I plan on seeing it twice. Once for each format.

I can't do 3-D. The tight plastic glasses make my head hurt all by themselves, and then the effect makes me feel dizzy. Old school 3-D with the paper glasses was never a problem for me, but I came out of Avatar with a blinding headache and had to wait for the disorientation to wear off before I could drive home. Not doing that ever again, so hopefully there will be a theater nearby willing to just show the movie without the price-bumped torture.

What reason had proved best ceased to look absurd to the eye, which shows how idle it is to think anything ridiculous except what is wrong.

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, February 3, 2012 12:45 PM

OPPYH

Quote:
Originally posted by PhoenixRose:

I can't do 3-D. The tight plastic glasses make my head hurt all by themselves, and then the effect makes me feel dizzy. Old school 3-D with the paper glasses was never a problem for me, but I came out of Avatar with a blinding headache and had to wait for the disorientation to wear off before I could drive home. Not doing that ever again, so hopefully there will be a theater nearby willing to just show the movie without the price-bumped torture.

I heard certain people have noticable problems with viewing 3-D(headaches, dizziness). That is unfortunate. I'm not crazy about it because to me the films seem darker(you are afterall essentially wearing sunglasses) and to be perfectly honest 3-d has never really "wowed" me.
My girlfriend loves 3-d though, so I have to watch a film that way once and a while.

----------------------------------------------------------------

70's TV FOREVER

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Monday, February 6, 2012 5:50 PM

RIONAEIRE

Beir bua agus beannacht

Yeah I liked listening to the actor talk, but any actor that can talk old fashioned and be a superhero from Asgard and all that stuff will do nicely as long as he too has a nice voice, I'm not attracted to the current actor from a physical standpoint, though I wouldn't kick him out of an elevator. And yes he does sound good.

I hate 3D, it doesn't look any different to me and it costs more money and I hate having things on my face.

"A completely coherant River means writers don't deliver" KatTaya

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Wednesday, February 8, 2012 12:04 AM

CLJOHNSTON108

Soooo, I take it y'all haven't seen the FULL version?

"I have an army."
"We have a Hulk."

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Wednesday, February 8, 2012 12:09 PM

BLUEEYEDBRIGADIER

I think Spanish supermodel Elsa Pataky would have something to say about that, PR...since she's married to the erstwhile God of Thunder

"The revenge of the beaten comes in refusing to fall." -- Mal, in "The Losing Side - Chapter 45" by jetflair

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Wednesday, February 8, 2012 5:28 PM

PHOENIXROSE

You think you know--what's to come, what you are. You haven't even begun.

Quote:
Originally posted by BlueEyedBrigadier:
I think Spanish supermodel Elsa Pataky would have something to say about that, PR...since she's married to the erstwhile God of Thunder

She can say what she likes, it won't change the lust-worthiness of the man. (Same goes for Patricia Marsters or anyone else who snags a total babe. I'm realistic enough to know that I wouldn't get near them even if they weren't married, so it makes no difference.)

What reason had proved best ceased to look absurd to the eye, which shows how idle it is to think anything ridiculous except what is wrong.

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, February 9, 2012 3:05 AM

CLJOHNSTON108

Sooo, nobody's gonna comment on the full clip?

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, February 9, 2012 4:59 PM

OONJERAH

Quote:
Originally posted by PhoenixRose:
Quote:
Originally posted by lwaves:
Quote:
Originally posted by RionaEire:
Once I found out Thor is in the Avengers I got way more interested. :)

Thor, or a certain Mr. Chris Hemsworth?

She might mean Thor, but I'd definitely see it for Chris Hemsworth and his hypnotic voice. Mmmmmmmm.

I didn't like Thor the movie much. Dumb story, excellent cast, what a waste of talent!

As for young Chris, I was very pleasantly surprised. The lad has charisma as well as looks; he should do well.

"All I suggest is a man hears what he wants to hear, and disregards the rest" ~Paul Simon

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Wednesday, February 29, 2012 9:20 AM

OPPYH

The third Avengers trailer

----------------------------------------------------------------

70's TV FOREVER

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Wednesday, February 29, 2012 10:00 AM

PHOENIXROSE

You think you know--what's to come, what you are. You haven't even begun.

Quote:
Originally posted by OPPYH:
The third Avengers trailer

Looking forward to it more and more!

What reason had proved best ceased to look absurd to the eye, which shows how idle it is to think anything ridiculous except what is wrong.

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

YOUR OPTIONS

SHARE THREAD

NEW POSTS TODAY

USER	POST DATE

USER

POST DATE