Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:

It's not all that complicated, because....it's just not.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:

I can understand it being studio property and all, and them wanting to keep possession of it, while at the same time not wanting to spend $$ to keep it in storage for perpetuity, but damn. Keeping it to weather away is essentially destroying it. Why not let someone display it, or at least an enthusiast keep it? A simple agreement, letting an outside party ( employees, maybe ? ) lease it every few yrs, for a small fee, like some museums do with expensive artifacts. If, after a short interval of time, the studio wants it back for some project, they know where to find it, and it'll be in far better condition.

It's not all that complicated, because....it's just not.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Cybersnark:
Went through the Universal Studios ride once, years ago. Was horrified to see "Max" from Flight of the Navigator, laying at an angle, covered with dust, rust, and grime, hatch gaping open like a wound.

-----
We applied the cortical electrodes but were unable to get a neural reaction from either patient.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by cljohnston108:
What, no love?

---