CINEMA

Shaken or stirred?

POSTED BY: WISHIMAY
UPDATED: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 15:12
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 1671
PAGE 1 of 1

Tuesday, January 11, 2011 6:51 PM

WISHIMAY

There will be fire and brimstone and Earth will be destroyed!... in several billion years!----------------------------------------- "Well, so long Earth. Thanks for the air... and what-not." -Philip J. Fry


New Bond movie due to be released late 2012. Director is Sam Mendes, starring Daniel Craig.


I miss Pierce Brosnan *sigh*

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, January 11, 2011 8:38 PM

HAKEN

Likes to mess with stuffs.


I thought Daniel Craig was done with the whole Bond franchise.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, January 11, 2011 8:44 PM

THESOMNAMBULIST


I'd heard the same thing Haken.


Cartoons - http://cirqusartsandmusic.blogspot.com

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, January 12, 2011 7:13 AM

WISHIMAY

There will be fire and brimstone and Earth will be destroyed!... in several billion years!----------------------------------------- "Well, so long Earth. Thanks for the air... and what-not." -Philip J. Fry


I guess they found his $$re-think-it$$ amount...

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, January 12, 2011 9:22 AM

GWEK


I wish they would stop making Bond movies just to make Bond movies and try to find a new and innovative hook for the character.

It used to be that a Bond movie MEANT something, but Bond is an artifact of the Cold War and the Cold War has been over for two decades. The early Brosnan movies mined the concept that Bond was a dinosaur, but even by the end of his run, the movies are what they are today: action movies that happen to feature a guy named James Bond rathr than Bond movies.

www.stillflying.net: "Here's how it might have been..."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, January 12, 2011 9:37 AM

STORYMARK


Quote:

Originally posted by HAKEN:
I thought Daniel Craig was done with the whole Bond franchise.



Nope, that was never the case. The delay has been all about MGMs financial situation, but Craig never said he was done. I think the closest thing may have been him saying that he wasn't sure if they would bring him back if it took too long to get a new movie up and running, but that's it. Anything about him bailing from the role was pure speculation.

"I thoroughly disapprove of duels. If a man should challenge me, I would take him kindly and forgivingly by the hand and lead him to a quiet place and kill him."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, January 12, 2011 9:39 AM

STORYMARK


Quote:

Originally posted by GWEK:
I wish they would stop making Bond movies just to make Bond movies and try to find a new and innovative hook for the character.

It used to be that a Bond movie MEANT something, but Bond is an artifact of the Cold War and the Cold War has been over for two decades. The early Brosnan movies mined the concept that Bond was a dinosaur, but even by the end of his run, the movies are what they are today: action movies that happen to feature a guy named James Bond rathr than Bond movies.

www.stillflying.net: "Here's how it might have been..."



Depends on what you want Bond to "mean". Casino Royale was very well received, examined the character in a way none of the other films have done, and updated the style in a way consistent with what came before. It also presented a Bond more in-line with Flemming's creation that had even been done on-screen.

Quantum of Solace... yeah, not so much. But that's one movie. No series gets it right every time, especially one as long running as Bond.

I really don't think any Bond movies really ever meant all that much to begin with. They're escapist fantasies, not much else.

"I thoroughly disapprove of duels. If a man should challenge me, I would take him kindly and forgivingly by the hand and lead him to a quiet place and kill him."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, January 12, 2011 10:16 AM

GWEK


I'm not trying to attribute heavy substance to a "Bond movie," just to note that a "Bond movie" didn't used to be just another action movie. It was something with a very distinctive feel and flavor. That has been long gone.

www.stillflying.net: "Here's how it might have been..."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, January 12, 2011 10:21 AM

STORYMARK


Quote:

Originally posted by GWEK:
I'm not trying to attribute heavy substance to a "Bond movie," just to note that a "Bond movie" didn't used to be just another action movie. It was something with a very distinctive feel and flavor. That has been long gone.

www.stillflying.net: "Here's how it might have been..."



I don't think it's "long gone". QoS blew it, no argument. But Casino Royale was aces as far as I'm concerned.

The Brosnan films had the right feel, sure. But most of them sucked pretty hard.

"I thoroughly disapprove of duels. If a man should challenge me, I would take him kindly and forgivingly by the hand and lead him to a quiet place and kill him."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, January 12, 2011 10:26 AM

GWEK


I think only the first maybe 2 Brosnan movies had it right, then they degenerated. While Casino Royale did have it's up-sides, I don't think I was nearly as impressed by it as you were.

Different strokes.

www.stillflying.net: "Here's how it might have been..."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, January 12, 2011 3:00 PM

WISHIMAY

There will be fire and brimstone and Earth will be destroyed!... in several billion years!----------------------------------------- "Well, so long Earth. Thanks for the air... and what-not." -Philip J. Fry


My childhood crushes were McGyver and Remington Steel. I willl always love Pierce Brosnan, so I will always be biased. Girly response, but I don't care...

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, January 12, 2011 3:08 PM

GWEK


Hey, I'm a straight guy and I love Pierce Brosnan! I thought he was a great Bond--but the scripts ddin't measure up. Not his fault.

www.stillflying.net: "Here's how it might have been..."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, January 12, 2011 3:12 PM

STORYMARK


Quote:

Originally posted by GWEK:
Hey, I'm a straight guy and I love Pierce Brosnan! I thought he was a great Bond--but the scripts ddin't measure up. Not his fault.

www.stillflying.net: "Here's how it might have been..."



Absolutely. I really dug Brosnan. Just wasn't wild about any of his movies, save Goldeneye.

"I thoroughly disapprove of duels. If a man should challenge me, I would take him kindly and forgivingly by the hand and lead him to a quiet place and kill him."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
What Are Your Must-See Films For 2019?
Mon, August 12, 2019 17:32 - 137 posts
Discussion of Alita: Battle Angel
Sat, July 27, 2019 07:51 - 64 posts
Top Gun: Maverick
Thu, July 18, 2019 16:17 - 12 posts
Spiderman: Into the Verse
Wed, July 3, 2019 20:11 - 10 posts
Alita: Battle Angel
Wed, June 12, 2019 17:58 - 47 posts
Godzilla: King of the Monsters
Sat, June 8, 2019 16:39 - 33 posts
What Are Your Must-See Films For 2018?
Sat, June 8, 2019 15:42 - 174 posts
Avengers: EndGame
Fri, May 31, 2019 19:53 - 25 posts
John Wick 3
Sun, May 26, 2019 17:38 - 15 posts
* Topic reposted in correct forum *
Wed, May 22, 2019 18:12 - 6 posts
May The Fourth Be With You, 2017
Thu, May 9, 2019 22:33 - 14 posts
Captain Marvel, DC or MCU?
Tue, April 30, 2019 14:04 - 126 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL