Sign Up | Log In
CINEMA
Shaken or stirred?
Tuesday, January 11, 2011 6:51 PM
WISHIMAY
Tuesday, January 11, 2011 8:38 PM
HAKEN
Likes to mess with stuffs.
Tuesday, January 11, 2011 8:44 PM
THESOMNAMBULIST
Wednesday, January 12, 2011 7:13 AM
Wednesday, January 12, 2011 9:22 AM
GWEK
Wednesday, January 12, 2011 9:37 AM
STORYMARK
Quote:Originally posted by HAKEN: I thought Daniel Craig was done with the whole Bond franchise.
Wednesday, January 12, 2011 9:39 AM
Quote:Originally posted by GWEK: I wish they would stop making Bond movies just to make Bond movies and try to find a new and innovative hook for the character. It used to be that a Bond movie MEANT something, but Bond is an artifact of the Cold War and the Cold War has been over for two decades. The early Brosnan movies mined the concept that Bond was a dinosaur, but even by the end of his run, the movies are what they are today: action movies that happen to feature a guy named James Bond rathr than Bond movies. www.stillflying.net: "Here's how it might have been..."
Wednesday, January 12, 2011 10:16 AM
Wednesday, January 12, 2011 10:21 AM
Quote:Originally posted by GWEK: I'm not trying to attribute heavy substance to a "Bond movie," just to note that a "Bond movie" didn't used to be just another action movie. It was something with a very distinctive feel and flavor. That has been long gone. www.stillflying.net: "Here's how it might have been..."
Wednesday, January 12, 2011 10:26 AM
Wednesday, January 12, 2011 3:00 PM
Wednesday, January 12, 2011 3:08 PM
Wednesday, January 12, 2011 3:12 PM
Quote:Originally posted by GWEK: Hey, I'm a straight guy and I love Pierce Brosnan! I thought he was a great Bond--but the scripts ddin't measure up. Not his fault. www.stillflying.net: "Here's how it might have been..."
YOUR OPTIONS
NEW POSTS TODAY
OTHER TOPICS
FFF.NET SOCIAL