REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Countdown Clock to Trumps impeachment " STARTS"

POSTED BY: THGRRI
UPDATED: Monday, July 22, 2019 20:39
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 76306
PAGE 11 of 56

Sunday, November 5, 2017 8:06 AM

THGRRI


Quote:

Originally posted by 1kiki:
"If you're going to quote someone here it's very easy. The program does it for you. What you did in no way suggests you were quoting SECOND."


Do you not know what quotation marks mean??? I put them there to indicate I was *quoting* someone else, and that I wasn't the original author.




"If you're going to quote someone here it's very easy. The program does it for you. What you did in no way suggests you were quoting SECOND."

Oh look, I just quoted myself from another post. Get the point dummy.







NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, November 5, 2017 10:45 AM

6IXSTRINGJACK

[/i]


Jeez T.

Just because the website has a system for quoting people doesn't mean that supersedes the long established English language.

I'd think twice about calling somebody else a dummy when you are exhibiting dummy behavior yourself in the argument.



That being said, maybe the reason that Kiki didn't use the system quote there is because it wasn't actually Second that said that either. Second was quoting an author and it was part of this paragraph:

Quote:

In his new book, The Great Leveler: Violence and the History of Inequality from the Stone Age to the Twenty-First Century, the Austrian historian Walter Scheidel puts forth a depressing and thought-provoking thesis: The only thing that can really dent rampant and long-lasting economic inequality is violence.


Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, November 6, 2017 11:37 AM

THGRRI


Quote:

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
Jeez T.

Just because the website has a system for quoting people doesn't mean that supersedes the long established English language.

I'd think twice about calling somebody else a dummy when you are exhibiting dummy behavior yourself in the argument.




You think you are arguing against me. Instead you are arguing against the proper etiquette of quoting someone dummy. This is why people get an education. What kiki did is wrong. You don't quote someone and not inform the reader who it is you are quoting. Some here do it all the time.

I've seen SIG put things in quotes here and then argue against what she quoted. Funny thing is, she made up these quoted statements herself. She did this so she could pretend to make someone look stupid and herself superior.

People here do all kinds of things to confuse or make their point. They do it for many different reasons. They also intentionally misquote people here all the time. They argue points based on false and twisted concepts of anothers' post as well. Only your friends do that Jack. I'm talking about kiki, SIG and their sock puppets.

You'll argue anything without thinking it through won't you? It's what makes you someone to be ignored.








NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, November 6, 2017 12:31 PM

THGRRI


Trump Jr. Hinted at Review of Anti-Russia Law, Moscow Lawyer Says

A Russian lawyer who met with President Donald Trump’s oldest son last year says he indicated that a law targeting Russia could be re-examined if his father won the election and asked her for written evidence that illegal proceeds went to Hillary Clinton’s campaign.


https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-11-06/trump-jr-said-anti-
russia-law-may-be-reviewed-moscow-lawyer-says







NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, November 6, 2017 7:27 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK

[/i]


Quote:

Originally posted by THGRRI:
Quote:

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
Jeez T.

Just because the website has a system for quoting people doesn't mean that supersedes the long established English language.

I'd think twice about calling somebody else a dummy when you are exhibiting dummy behavior yourself in the argument.




You think you are arguing against me. Instead you are arguing against the proper etiquette of quoting someone dummy. This is why people get an education. What kiki did is wrong. You don't quote someone and not inform the reader who it is you are quoting. Some here do it all the time.

I've seen SIG put things in quotes here and then argue against what she quoted. Funny thing is, she made up these quoted statements herself. She did this so she could pretend to make someone look stupid and herself superior.

People here do all kinds of things to confuse or make their point. They do it for many different reasons. They also intentionally misquote people here all the time. They argue points based on false and twisted concepts of anothers' post as well. Only your friends do that Jack. I'm talking about kiki, SIG and their sock puppets.

You'll argue anything without thinking it through won't you? It's what makes you someone to be ignored.










She DID put it in quotes. She just didn't put it in the FFF.NET system quotes.

Anybody with half a brain would have known that Kiki didn't write that.

I think we've cleared up the confusion about it.


And LOL that Kiki and I are friends. What, are you new here?

No offense, Kiki.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, November 7, 2017 4:25 AM

JEWELSTAITEFAN


Quote:

Originally posted by THGRRI:
Quote:

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
Jeez T.

Just because the website has a system for quoting people doesn't mean that supersedes the long established English language.

I'd think twice about calling somebody else a dummy when you are exhibiting dummy behavior yourself in the argument.

You think you are arguing against me. Instead you are arguing against the proper etiquette of quoting someone dummy. This is why people get an education. What kiki did is wrong. You don't quote someone and not inform the reader who it is you are quoting. Some here do it all the time.

I've seen SIG put things in quotes here and then argue against what she quoted. Funny thing is, she made up these quoted statements herself. She did this so she could pretend to make someone look stupid and herself superior.

People here do all kinds of things to confuse or make their point. They do it for many different reasons. They also intentionally misquote people here all the time. They argue points based on false and twisted concepts of anothers' post as well. Only your friends do that Jack. I'm talking about kiki, SIG and their sock puppets.

You'll argue anything without thinking it through won't you? It's what makes you someone to be ignored.

It is a bit chilly out, and we had snow on Saturday, but is Hell freezing over?
This is really hard to admit, but T has a point, several of them.
The rampant lack of attribution and unclear quotes gets quite confusing. Not to mention some posters replying BEFORE the quote they are REPLYING to. Like reversing chronological sequence.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, November 7, 2017 10:36 AM

THGRRI


Quote:

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Quote:

Originally posted by THGRRI:
Quote:

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
Jeez T.

Just because the website has a system for quoting people doesn't mean that supersedes the long established English language.

I'd think twice about calling somebody else a dummy when you are exhibiting dummy behavior yourself in the argument.

You think you are arguing against me. Instead you are arguing against the proper etiquette of quoting someone dummy. This is why people get an education. What kiki did is wrong. You don't quote someone and not inform the reader who it is you are quoting. Some here do it all the time.

I've seen SIG put things in quotes here and then argue against what she quoted. Funny thing is, she made up these quoted statements herself. She did this so she could pretend to make someone look stupid and herself superior.

People here do all kinds of things to confuse or make their point. They do it for many different reasons. They also intentionally misquote people here all the time. They argue points based on false and twisted concepts of anothers' post as well. Only your friends do that Jack. I'm talking about kiki, SIG and their sock puppets.

You'll argue anything without thinking it through won't you? It's what makes you someone to be ignored.

It is a bit chilly out, and we had snow on Saturday, but is Hell freezing over?
This is really hard to admit, but T has a point, several of them.
The rampant lack of attribution and unclear quotes gets quite confusing. Not to mention some posters replying BEFORE the quote they are REPLYING to. Like reversing chronological sequence.



At least you can separate out who said what when they reply above the quoted context, but I do get your point. I'm guilty of that myself at times. It's just that many times the quoted posts are just to long. If the response is at the top you can go to the quoted part being referred to instead of constantly having to read the entire post.

When you look at kiki's posts many many times they are a confusing mess. And much of the time SIGs' are made up or misquoted. If they won't clarify who they've quoted and quote them properly and accurately then the post should be dismissed as bogus.

Now, back to the countdown clock and news of the day shall we.






NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, November 7, 2017 10:53 AM

THGRRI








NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, November 7, 2017 1:12 PM

JEWELSTAITEFAN


Quote:

Originally posted by THGRRI:
Quote:

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Quote:

Originally posted by THGRRI:
Quote:

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
Jeez T.

Just because the website has a system for quoting people doesn't mean that supersedes the long established English language.

I'd think twice about calling somebody else a dummy when you are exhibiting dummy behavior yourself in the argument.

You think you are arguing against me. Instead you are arguing against the proper etiquette of quoting someone dummy. This is why people get an education. What kiki did is wrong. You don't quote someone and not inform the reader who it is you are quoting. Some here do it all the time.

I've seen SIG put things in quotes here and then argue against what she quoted. Funny thing is, she made up these quoted statements herself. She did this so she could pretend to make someone look stupid and herself superior.

People here do all kinds of things to confuse or make their point. They do it for many different reasons. They also intentionally misquote people here all the time. They argue points based on false and twisted concepts of anothers' post as well. Only your friends do that Jack. I'm talking about kiki, SIG and their sock puppets.

You'll argue anything without thinking it through won't you? It's what makes you someone to be ignored.

It is a bit chilly out, and we had snow on Saturday, but is Hell freezing over?
This is really hard to admit, but T has a point, several of them.
The rampant lack of attribution and unclear quotes gets quite confusing. Not to mention some posters replying BEFORE the quote they are REPLYING to. Like reversing chronological sequence.

At least you can separate out who said what when they reply above the quoted context, but I do get your point. I'm guilty of that myself at times. It's just that many times the quoted posts are just to long. If the response is at the top you can go to the quoted part being referred to instead of constantly having to read the entire post.

When you look at kiki's posts many many times they are a confusing mess. And much of the time SIGs' are made up or misquoted. If they won't clarify who they've quoted and quote them properly and accurately then the post should be dismissed as bogus.

Now, back to the countdown clock and news of the day shall we.

I was recalling that some sites include the date time of the original post being quoted. Very handy.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, November 7, 2017 1:36 PM

THGRRI


Quote:

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Quote:

Originally posted by THGRRI:
Quote:

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Quote:

Originally posted by THGRRI:
Quote:

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
Jeez T.

Just because the website has a system for quoting people doesn't mean that supersedes the long established English language.

I'd think twice about calling somebody else a dummy when you are exhibiting dummy behavior yourself in the argument.

You think you are arguing against me. Instead you are arguing against the proper etiquette of quoting someone dummy. This is why people get an education. What kiki did is wrong. You don't quote someone and not inform the reader who it is you are quoting. Some here do it all the time.

I've seen SIG put things in quotes here and then argue against what she quoted. Funny thing is, she made up these quoted statements herself. She did this so she could pretend to make someone look stupid and herself superior.

People here do all kinds of things to confuse or make their point. They do it for many different reasons. They also intentionally misquote people here all the time. They argue points based on false and twisted concepts of anothers' post as well. Only your friends do that Jack. I'm talking about kiki, SIG and their sock puppets.

You'll argue anything without thinking it through won't you? It's what makes you someone to be ignored.

It is a bit chilly out, and we had snow on Saturday, but is Hell freezing over?
This is really hard to admit, but T has a point, several of them.
The rampant lack of attribution and unclear quotes gets quite confusing. Not to mention some posters replying BEFORE the quote they are REPLYING to. Like reversing chronological sequence.

At least you can separate out who said what when they reply above the quoted context, but I do get your point. I'm guilty of that myself at times. It's just that many times the quoted posts are just to long. If the response is at the top you can go to the quoted part being referred to instead of constantly having to read the entire post.

When you look at kiki's posts many many times they are a confusing mess. And much of the time SIGs' are made up or misquoted. If they won't clarify who they've quoted and quote them properly and accurately then the post should be dismissed as bogus.

Now, back to the countdown clock and news of the day shall we.

I was recalling that some sites include the date time of the original post being quoted. Very handy.



Yes, it's especially handy when dealing with people who are dishonest.






NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, November 7, 2017 3:47 PM

SECOND

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly


Quote:

Originally posted by THGRRI:

Yes, it's especially handy when dealing with people who are dishonest.

Speaking of dishonest: Trump's adviser, Carter Page’s bizarre testimony to the House Intelligence Committee, explained. He testified for more than six hours on the Russia scandal. It was weird.

www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/11/7/16616912/carter-page-testimo
ny-trump-russia


Page has been talking nonstop about the scandal in the press, always proclaiming his total innocence. Page frequently filibusters, goes on tangents, and works himself into a state of high dudgeon. But when he’s asked to explain how what he’s saying now fits with the actual emails he wrote at the time, things get awkward. Pressed on inconsistencies, Page struggled to explain them.

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, November 7, 2017 5:25 PM

JO753

rezident owtsidr


Quote:

Originally posted by THGRRI:
( Carter Paje testimony video )



With Trump sumhow connected to the big Saudi Arabia nyooz my consern that its much bigger and stinkyer that just TrumPutin iz growing.

----------------------------
DUZ XaT SEM RiT TQ YQ? - Jubal Early

http://www.7532020.com

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, November 7, 2017 5:57 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK

[/i]


Quote:

Originally posted by THGRRI:
Quote:

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Quote:

Originally posted by THGRRI:
Quote:

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Quote:

Originally posted by THGRRI:
Quote:

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
Jeez T.

Just because the website has a system for quoting people doesn't mean that supersedes the long established English language.

I'd think twice about calling somebody else a dummy when you are exhibiting dummy behavior yourself in the argument.

You think you are arguing against me. Instead you are arguing against the proper etiquette of quoting someone dummy. This is why people get an education. What kiki did is wrong. You don't quote someone and not inform the reader who it is you are quoting. Some here do it all the time.

I've seen SIG put things in quotes here and then argue against what she quoted. Funny thing is, she made up these quoted statements herself. She did this so she could pretend to make someone look stupid and herself superior.

People here do all kinds of things to confuse or make their point. They do it for many different reasons. They also intentionally misquote people here all the time. They argue points based on false and twisted concepts of anothers' post as well. Only your friends do that Jack. I'm talking about kiki, SIG and their sock puppets.

You'll argue anything without thinking it through won't you? It's what makes you someone to be ignored.

It is a bit chilly out, and we had snow on Saturday, but is Hell freezing over?
This is really hard to admit, but T has a point, several of them.
The rampant lack of attribution and unclear quotes gets quite confusing. Not to mention some posters replying BEFORE the quote they are REPLYING to. Like reversing chronological sequence.

At least you can separate out who said what when they reply above the quoted context, but I do get your point. I'm guilty of that myself at times. It's just that many times the quoted posts are just to long. If the response is at the top you can go to the quoted part being referred to instead of constantly having to read the entire post.

When you look at kiki's posts many many times they are a confusing mess. And much of the time SIGs' are made up or misquoted. If they won't clarify who they've quoted and quote them properly and accurately then the post should be dismissed as bogus.

Now, back to the countdown clock and news of the day shall we.

I was recalling that some sites include the date time of the original post being quoted. Very handy.



Yes, it's especially handy when dealing with people who are dishonest.




LOL... yeah. You mean like the few times I have caught you doing that red handed by quoting your posts and then calling you out later when you changed the post after the fact.

And seriously dude. If you absolutely must use the pink font. Please do everybody a favor and put an end bracket on that shit so everybody quoting you doesn't have to take the extra step of removing your color.

I'm not sure if you're actually aware of the inconvenience you pose for everybody with that.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, November 7, 2017 8:57 PM

JO753

rezident owtsidr


Duznt bug me.


----------------------------
DUZ XaT SEM RiT TQ YQ? - Jubal Early

http://www.7532020.com

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, November 7, 2017 9:10 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK

[/i]


You rarely ever quote him. Every time you do you have to edit your post to get rid of the pink on your own words.

I normally wouldn't point it out, in fact I've dealt with it for months now, but T goes out of his way to slam other people about their own posting etiquette.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, November 8, 2017 12:40 AM

JEWELSTAITEFAN


Quote:

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
You rarely ever quote him. Every time you do you have to edit your post to get rid of the pink on your own words.

I normally wouldn't point it out, in fact I've dealt with it for months now, but T goes out of his way to slam other people about their own posting etiquette.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

And Six's point is as valid as T's. And T is not the sole perpetrator.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, November 8, 2017 2:01 AM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


Quote:

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
That being said, maybe the reason that Kiki didn't use the system quote there is because it wasn't actually Second that said that either.

Naw, mostly because I find the progressively inward- and backward-going indents to be awkward, and it's just too time consuming to erase all the extraneous stuff when I only want a sentence or two. Hence, quotation marks.




HAS IT NOT OCCURRED TO YOU BY NOW THAT IF YOU HAVE TO RESORT TO LOGICAL FALLACIES AND TROLLING YOUR SO-CALLED ARGUMENTS ARE LIES?

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, November 8, 2017 2:06 AM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


"You don't quote someone and not inform the reader who it is you are quoting. Some here do it all the time.'

Why not? I'm responding TO YOU. You know what you posted. And you don't need me to tell you who you are. Do you?

And anyone else can see the point I'm addressing BECAUSE I QUOTE IT, and also my subsequent response to that point. Who I'm responding to doesn't change the discussion. Unless of course what you think about something depends on who's saying it. In which case, you're awfully weak-minded.

As for sockpuppets, neither I nor signy has ever had them. But you are bound and determined to find them even when they don't exist.

I'm curious who you think is my sockpuppet(s). I can't imagine anyone that could even remotely be attached to me, especially now that this place is a ghost town, and most of the dregs who are still here have been here forever, with their own unique and individual voices.

Except you of course. You're DT.




HAS IT NOT OCCURRED TO YOU BY NOW THAT IF YOU HAVE TO RESORT TO LOGICAL FALLACIES AND TROLLING YOUR SO-CALLED ARGUMENTS ARE LIES?

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, November 8, 2017 9:45 AM

6IXSTRINGJACK

[/i]


I've been accused by T of being a sock puppet of you or Signy before.

Funny how that's never been the other way around though...

I guess I'm just too stupid to have a sockpuppet of my own.

Oh... wait.

If I'm your sock puppet Kiki, that means that you are stupid too.


I'm confused.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, November 8, 2017 10:03 AM

THGRRI


I am going to quote this post and see for myself if my posting in pink causes a problem.






NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, November 8, 2017 10:04 AM

THGRRI


Quote:

Originally posted by THGRRI:
I am going to quote this post and see for myself if my posting in pink causes a problem.



OK, this time I am not posting in pink and I will see if someone replying to me is unduly inconvenienced.

Ok did it. It's easy as shit to just delete the color comand. You don't even have to delete the whole thing. I would add that I've been doing it for years here with SIG and kiki. kiki has been using different colors in the same post for years. And she and SIG both have had huge signatures I don't want to repost so I've deleted them first. No bitching from me.

How you quote someone has nothing to do with any of that. It's basic shit. When you quote someone you credit them. kiki thinks when someone responds to what she posts that the poster automatically knows who she is quoting. What she is doing is done out of laziness and is disrespectful to all here.







NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, November 8, 2017 10:22 AM

JO753

rezident owtsidr


I hav sum bad newz for you 3 (6, KIKI, Sig).

You are all sock puppets.

A special R&D group within the GRU had a mission to develop AI software that coud 'liv' on the internet, functioning at a level beyond wut a human can possibly achieve given our time limitationz. It woud need to be able to appear az input from a real human with no help from an operator.

They sekseeded.

This AI gets all the prosessing power it needz from massive supercomputerz in Russian server farmz, but also hijacks millionz uv computerz around the world. It sets up dozenz, even hundredz uv new marrionettes like you guyz every day. Part uv making you work properly iz to make you think you are real, so you hav a bunch uv subrutinez that simulate the ordinary real life activityz that humanz do - eating, sleeping, watching TV, paying taxez, taking a bath, feeding your pets, driving to the store etc. etc. etc. If you ever notis everything getting monotonous, repetitive or deja vu, it tossez in a little 'vacation' uv sum sort to make it all seem real agen. A car crash, a medical problem, maybe even a vacation!

Yes, your entire life iz an illusion. Your only real existens iz here on the web. Your only purpose iz to serve Putin.

(nise idea for a sifi story! But I'm sure its been ritten a million timez alredy, so this iz az far az I'm going with it.)


----------------------------
DUZ XaT SEM RiT TQ YQ? - Jubal Early

http://www.7532020.com

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, November 8, 2017 10:27 AM

THGRRI


Back to politics shall we? The elections yesterday are important because if the Republicans think backing Trump is no longer in their best interest they will be more likely to turn on him.


Democrats post big wins in first nationwide elections under Trump

Democrats won in Virginia, New York, New Jersey and New England -- while Republicans held onto the only congressional seat up for grabs.

Nov. 8 (UPI) -- Progressive Democrats were big winners in Tuesday's nationwide elections -- signaling what some observers say is a referendum on President Donald Trump's administration.

https://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2017/11/08/Democrats-post-big-wins-in-
first-nationwide-elections-under-Trump/6181510142797
/






NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, November 8, 2017 10:58 AM

6IXSTRINGJACK

[/i]


Quote:

Originally posted by THGRRI:
Quote:

Originally posted by THGRRI:
I am going to quote this post and see for myself if my posting in pink causes a problem.



OK, this time I am not posting in pink and I will see if someone replying to me is unduly inconvenienced.

Ok did it. It's easy as shit to just delete the color comand. You don't even have to delete the whole thing. I would add that I've been doing it for years here with SIG and kiki. kiki has been using different colors in the same post for years. And she and SIG both have had huge signatures I don't want to repost so I've deleted them first. No bitching from me.

How you quote someone has nothing to do with any of that. It's basic shit. When you quote someone you credit them. kiki thinks when someone responds to what she posts that the poster automatically knows who she is quoting. What she is doing is done out of laziness and is disrespectful to all here.









You forcing everyone to delete your open ended color quote is disrespectful to everybody here too. Keep using the color. Just put an end tag on it.

I will agree that it's just as irritating to have to delete long signatures here at FFF.net as well.

I'd suggest that Haken fix that since many other forums don't add the signature to quotes these days, but I won't bother him since there is so little traffic at the site now.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, November 8, 2017 11:02 AM

6IXSTRINGJACK

[/i]


Quote:

Originally posted by JO753:
I hav sum bad newz for you 3 (6, KIKI, Sig).

You are all sock puppets.

A special R&D group within the GRU had a mission to develop AI software that coud 'liv' on the internet, functioning at a level beyond wut a human can possibly achieve given our time limitationz. It woud need to be able to appear az input from a real human with no help from an operator.

They sekseeded.

This AI gets all the prosessing power it needz from massive supercomputerz in Russian server farmz, but also hijacks millionz uv computerz around the world. It sets up dozenz, even hundredz uv new marrionettes like you guyz every day. Part uv making you work properly iz to make you think you are real, so you hav a bunch uv subrutinez that simulate the ordinary real life activityz that humanz do - eating, sleeping, watching TV, paying taxez, taking a bath, feeding your pets, driving to the store etc. etc. etc. If you ever notis everything getting monotonous, repetitive or deja vu, it tossez in a little 'vacation' uv sum sort to make it all seem real agen. A car crash, a medical problem, maybe even a vacation!

Yes, your entire life iz an illusion. Your only real existens iz here on the web. Your only purpose iz to serve Putin.

(nise idea for a sifi story! But I'm sure its been ritten a million timez alredy, so this iz az far az I'm going with it.)


----------------------------
DUZ XaT SEM RiT TQ YQ? - Jubal Early

http://www.7532020.com



You'll have to throw a little bit of time travel in there as well since I've been posting here since around 2006. Longer than at least half of the regular folk who still post in these parts.

Although I suspect just putting some lame thing about taking over dead accounts and making "zombies" out of them would be more plausible.


Only problem with that second part for me is that I would suspect there are far easier targets to choose from than me on this board to resurrect. I don't think it would make sense to use mine.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, November 8, 2017 11:07 AM

THGRRI


Back to politics shall we? The elections yesterday are important because if the Republicans think backing Trump is no longer in their best interest they will be more likely to turn on him.


Democrats post big wins in first nationwide elections under Trump

Democrats won in Virginia, New York, New Jersey and New England -- while Republicans held onto the only congressional seat up for grabs.

Nov. 8 (UPI) -- Progressive Democrats were big winners in Tuesday's nationwide elections -- signaling what some observers say is a referendum on President Donald Trump's administration.

https://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2017/11/08/Democrats-post-big-wins-in-
first-nationwide-elections-under-Trump/6181510142797
/









NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, November 8, 2017 4:31 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK

[/i]


Sorry our conversation got in the way of your year long countdown clock, T.


Gee, ya don't say, huh?

Glad you're keeping us up to speed and also keeping us on track. Not like I didn't already see you post about this on 2 other threads already.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, November 8, 2017 6:28 PM

JO753

rezident owtsidr


Quote:

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:

You'll have to throw a little bit of time travel in there as well since I've been posting here since around 2006.



The AI haz been online sins around 2003. You are marrionette #2,427, a relatively early model, but youv been upgraded all along, so therez no real differens from the newest modelz.

----------------------------
DUZ XaT SEM RiT TQ YQ? - Jubal Early

http://www.7532020.com

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, November 8, 2017 7:47 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK

[/i]


Freakin' Sweet!

I wonder if my "real body" isn't even real at all?

My "consciousness" feels as though it is in the "real world" right now typing this on a laptop and when I'm not here typing things online that I'm doing all other sorts of stuff, but maybe that is just part of my programming... part of my learning process.

Maybe these memories are built off of somebody else's life and what they post about themselves online, or maybe an amalgamation of many somebodies.

Maybe I'm immortal?

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, November 8, 2017 8:52 PM

JO753

rezident owtsidr


I figure if I dont need to copy any 'real' stuff to create fake peepl, an AI with the brain power uv a God coud do it in its sleep.

Now consider many competing AIz.

The final rezult will be the entire internet filled with fake peepl! No room for us, so we'd need to construct a completely seperate internet if we dont want to go back to the stone aje.

Hey! This soundz like a good flashback story for The Verse to explain why there are no droidz or advanst computerz! The only sure way to prevent them from taking over iz to keep them stoopid & simple.

----------------------------
DUZ XaT SEM RiT TQ YQ? - Jubal Early

http://www.7532020.com

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, November 8, 2017 10:22 PM

OONJERAH


Ff FANs currently posting in RWED 22?

6Stringjack = 6Stringjoker
Auraptor - Reaverfan
1Kiki - Piratenews
Brenda - Riverlove  
Second - Bytemite  
Whozit - Shinygoodguy
Signym - Jayneztown
Thgrri - Jewelstaitefan
Jo753 - Rahlmaclaren
KPO - Wishimay
G - Oonjerah

However, this web site is much bigger than RWED.
There are plenty of other folks posting about other things.

... oooOO}{OOooo ...

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, November 8, 2017 11:30 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK

[/i]


Quote:

Originally posted by Oonjerah:
Ff FANs currently posting in RWED 22?

6Stringjack - 6Stringjoker
Auraptor - Reaverfan
1Kiki - Piratenews
Brenda - Riverlove  
Second - Bytemite  
Whozit - Shinygoodguy
Signym - Jayneztown
Thgrri - Jewelstaitefan
Jo753 - Rahlmaclaren
KPO - Wishimay
G - Oonjerah

However, this web site is much bigger than RWED.
There are plenty of other folks posting about other things.

... oooOO}{OOooo ...



Not sure if that's a list of potential sockpuppets you've made there or not OONJ.

I'll just let it be known that from moment one I never pretended that my other ID wasn't me. And now that i'm using the old one I immediately said why that was the case as well. Never have I used both at the same time and I even named them so similarly so nobody would accuse me of any shenanigans. :)


That would be interesting if you were G though. I, for one, find this persona much more agreeable.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, November 8, 2017 11:40 PM

OONJERAH


No, I am not G.
Since you, Jack, are listed twice at the top,
it's a 2-column list of 21 (not 22) people on the board.

Clearly, a lot of the folks on the list do not show up
to post here daily.

I, for one, miss some of the folks who used to post on RWED.

... oooOO}{OOooo ...

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, November 9, 2017 10:40 AM

THGRRI


Quote:

Originally posted by Oonjerah:
Ff FANs currently posting in RWED 22?

6Stringjack = 6Stringjoker
Auraptor - Reaverfan
1Kiki - Piratenews
Brenda - Riverlove  
Second - Bytemite  
Whozit - Shinygoodguy
Signym - Jayneztown
Thgrri - Jewelstaitefan
Jo753 - Rahlmaclaren
KPO - Wishimay
G - Oonjerah

However, this web site is much bigger than RWED.
There are plenty of other folks posting about other things.

... oooOO}{OOooo ...



Interesting list. Some here, a select few, post in all of the sites venues. Chat and so on, I do.






NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, November 9, 2017 10:43 AM

JO753

rezident owtsidr




The Speaker replyz "Memberz are reminded to refrain from engajing in personalityz agenst the prezident".

Soundz like sumthing from Idiocrasy, like Steven Root az the juj.

----------------------------
DUZ XaT SEM RiT TQ YQ? - Jubal Early

http://www.7532020.com

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, November 9, 2017 10:53 AM

THGRRI


Quote:

Originally posted by JO753:

The Speaker replyz "Memberz are reminded to refrain from engajing in personalityz agenst the prezident".

Soundz like sumthing from Idiocrasy, like Steven Root az the juj.



It's very incendiary and only helps to prevent reason and logic from winning the day. This process has to play out and the rule of law should dictate the outcome. Not the ideology of a few on the left in this case. They don't realize it but they too are ignorant of the process and they too are a threat to our democratic institutions and way of life.






NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, November 9, 2017 11:04 AM

6IXSTRINGJACK

[/i]


Quote:

Originally posted by Oonjerah:
No, I am not G.
Since you, Jack, are listed twice at the top,
it's a 2-column list of 21 (not 22) people on the board.

Clearly, a lot of the folks on the list do not show up
to post here daily.

I, for one, miss some of the folks who used to post on RWED.

... oooOO}{OOooo ...



I miss some of them too. I hope if they ever reboot Firefly they don't screw it up and maybe some of them will come back.

T's been accusing people lately of sock-puppetry and said that Signy was Jayneztown.

I just saw my two names next to each other and Signy and Jaynez together and then I looked at the rest of the list and thought about it and although I won't mention any of them I did see a few others who could potentially be the same person.

Personally, I don't believe anybody here is using sock puppets, but I could be wrong.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, November 9, 2017 2:05 PM

JEWELSTAITEFAN



Only 2,630 days remaining on the Impeachment Clock.

how exciting.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, November 10, 2017 11:53 AM

THGRRI


Rep. Eric Swalwell said he wants to know whether the Russians paid for early Trump campaign adviser George Papadopoulos' travels throughout Europe during the election.

Papadopoulos pleaded guilty earlier this year to lying to federal agents about his contacts with Russia-linked foreign nationals while serving as a junior foreign policy adviser for President Donald Trump's campaign team.

The White House and former Trump campaign advisers have sought to distance themselves from Papadopoulos, claiming he was just a "low-level volunteer."

http://www.businessinsider.com/house-intel-democrat-wants-to-know-if-r
ussia-paid-for-papadopoulos-travel-2017-11







NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, November 10, 2017 2:10 PM

THGRRI


Mueller Probing Pre-Election Flynn Meeting with Pro-Russia Congressman

WASHINGTON — Investigators for Special Counsel Robert Mueller are questioning witnesses about an alleged September 2016 meeting between Mike Flynn, who later briefly served as President Donald Trump’s national security adviser, and Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, a staunch advocate of policies that would help Russia, two sources with knowledge of the investigation told NBC News.

The meeting allegedly took place in Washington the evening of Sept. 20, while Flynn was working as an adviser to Trump’s presidential campaign. It was arranged by his lobbying firm, the Flynn Intel Group. Also in attendance were Flynn’s business partners, Bijan Kian and Brian McCauley, and Flynn’s son, Michael G. Flynn, who worked closely with his father, the sources said.

Mueller is reviewing emails sent from Flynn Intel Group to Rohrabacher’s congressional staff thanking them for the meeting, according to one of the sources, as part of his probe into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election and possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/mueller-probing-pre-election-flyn
n-meeting-pro-russia-congressman-n819676








NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, November 10, 2017 10:19 PM

OONJERAH


6ixStringJack: "I miss some of them too. I hope if they ever reboot
Firefly, they don't screw it up and maybe some of them will come back."

Well, now that Disney owns it, I wonder if they will reboot it.

In the meantime, how's the Mueller investigation going?


... oooOO}{OOooo ...

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, November 10, 2017 11:26 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


General greed and shady dealings - same as Clinton except Hillary isn't being investigated for it.

Meanwhile, anyone who even looked at a Russian is suspect. But there's no evidence of collusion.




HAS IT NOT OCCURRED TO YOU BY NOW THAT IF YOU HAVE TO RESORT TO LOGICAL FALLACIES AND TROLLING YOUR SO-CALLED ARGUMENTS ARE LIES?

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, November 11, 2017 2:38 AM

JEWELSTAITEFAN


Quote:

Originally posted by Oonjerah:
6ixStringJack: "I miss some of them too. I hope if they ever reboot
Firefly, they don't screw it up and maybe some of them will come back."

Well, now that Disney owns it, I wonder if they will reboot it.

In the meantime, how's the Mueller investigation going?


... oooOO}{OOooo ...

Mueller is being investigated? About time.
But without evidence, it would only last a couple years.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, November 11, 2017 9:57 AM

THGRRI


Quote:

Originally posted by Oonjerah:
6ixStringJack: "I miss some of them too. I hope if they ever reboot
Firefly, they don't screw it up and maybe some of them will come back."

Well, now that Disney owns it, I wonder if they will reboot it.

In the meantime, how's the Mueller investigation going?


... oooOO}{OOooo ...



There's nothing that can be said about Mueller that isn't good. Unless it's a lie. Still some persist. Those who post negatively about him are the ones who have agendas or have succumb to an unrealistic, unhealthy ideology. Pretty much Jack, kiki, SIG, and JSF have responded in such a way so far.

The thing to know is that no matter what anyone here says, the rule of law will win out. Our democratic institutions including ( judicial and media ), will grow stronger because of this.







NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, November 11, 2017 6:06 PM

THGRRI


The President, Donald Trump just betrayed America again. Once again he stated Putin denies the accusations against Russian meddling, and Trump sided with him.

Tick tock, tick tock







NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, November 11, 2017 10:03 PM

OONJERAH


What I like about PotUS, D. Trump:
  He'll never resort to a press secretary.
He has no idea that he sounds so foolish.

What I don't like about him:
  I think he's actually dangerous.

A friend told me this & I couldn't believe it: A lot of people
in our government would actually like to see Armageddon.


... oooOO}{OOooo ...

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, November 11, 2017 10:13 PM

JEWELSTAITEFAN


Quote:

Originally posted by Oonjerah:
Ff FANs currently posting in RWED 22?

6Stringjack = 6Stringjoker
Auraptor - Reaverfan
1Kiki - Piratenews
Brenda - Riverlove  
Second - Bytemite  
Whozit - Shinygoodguy
Signym - Jayneztown
Thgrri - Jewelstaitefan
Jo753 - Rahlmaclaren
KPO - Wishimay
G - Oonjerah

However, this web site is much bigger than RWED.
There are plenty of other folks posting about other things.

... oooOO}{OOooo ...

You could add Elvischrist, unless that is somebody already listed above.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, November 11, 2017 10:38 PM

SECOND

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly


Quote:

Originally posted by Oonjerah:
What I like about PotUS, D. Trump:
He'll never resort to a press secretary.
He has no idea that he sounds so foolish.

I love the funny president of the United States, the greatest negotiator the world has ever seen:

Q: Did Russia’s attempts to meddle in US elections come up in the conversations with Putin?

Trump: "He said he didn’t meddle, he said he didn’t meddle. I asked him again. You can only ask so many times."

Q: Do you believe him?

Trump: "Well, look….that whole thing was set up by the Democrats. Look at Podesta, look at all the things that they have done with the phony dossier. Those are the big events. But Putin said he did not do what they said he did…."

Q: On election meddling, did you ask him the question?

Trump: "Every time he sees me he says I didn’t do that and I really believe that when he tells me that, he means it. But he says I didn’t do that. I think he is very insulted by it, which is not a good thing for our country."

www.axios.com/trump-sides-with-putin-over-intelligence-agencies-on-rus
sian-meddling-2508577822.html


There you have it. Russia had nothing to do with any hacking or trollbots or fake news or any of that. It was all just a big Democratic dirty trick, although American intelligence agencies, including the CIA, NSA, FBI and the ODNI (Office of the Director of National Intelligence) are unified in their opinion that Russia actively worked to meddle in the election.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, November 11, 2017 11:02 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


"A lot of people in our government would actually like to see Armageddon."

That's not news. It's what got us Bush Jr's Iraq War.

(subscription only)

Atheist War Hawks Manipulate Believers to Beat the Drums of War

Leo Strauss is the father of the Neo-Conservative movement, including many leaders of the current administration.

Indeed, many of the main neocon players – including Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, Stephen Cambone, Elliot Abrams, and Adam Shulsky – were students of Strauss at the University of Chicago, where he taught for many years.

The people pushing for war against Iran are the same neocons who pushed for war against Iraq. See this and this. (They planned both wars at least 20 years ago.) For example, Shulsky was the director of the Office of Special Plans – the Pentagon unit responsible for selling false intelligence regarding Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction. He is now a member of the equivalent organization targeting Iran: the Iranian Directorate.

Strauss taught that religion should be used as a way to manipulate people to achieve the aims of the leaders. But that the leaders themselves need not believe in religion.




HAS IT NOT OCCURRED TO YOU BY NOW THAT IF YOU HAVE TO RESORT TO LOGICAL FALLACIES AND TROLLING YOUR SO-CALLED ARGUMENTS ARE LIES?

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, November 12, 2017 8:59 AM

THGRRI


Leo Strauss died in 1973. He had nothing to do with the invasion of Iraq. Your hypotheses is based on the men you mention having no other influences' in their lives other that Strauss. He was not in the room when the decisions were being made. I doubt you even understand what you posted. All it is, is speculation and subjective bullshit. None of which is based in fact.

A bit of advice. Those who may wish for Armageddon, may wish for it kiki, would include religious nuts and only religious nuts. You and sig are focused only on the most negative aspects of everything. Collectively your posts offer up a sad commentary about your make ups.





Quote:

Originally posted by 1kiki:
"A lot of people in our government would actually like to see Armageddon."

That's not news. It's what got us Bush Jr's Iraq War.

(subscription only)

Atheist War Hawks Manipulate Believers to Beat the Drums of War

Leo Strauss is the father of the Neo-Conservative movement, including many leaders of the current administration.

Indeed, many of the main neocon players – including Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, Stephen Cambone, Elliot Abrams, and Adam Shulsky – were students of Strauss at the University of Chicago, where he taught for many years.

The people pushing for war against Iran are the same neocons who pushed for war against Iraq. See this and this. (They planned both wars at least 20 years ago.) For example, Shulsky was the director of the Office of Special Plans – the Pentagon unit responsible for selling false intelligence regarding Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction. He is now a member of the equivalent organization targeting Iran: the Iranian Directorate.

Strauss taught that religion should be used as a way to manipulate people to achieve the aims of the leaders. But that the leaders themselves need not believe in religion.








NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
In the garden, and RAIN!!!!
Tue, July 23, 2019 02:03 - 2381 posts
The secret plot to depose Trump
Mon, July 22, 2019 21:48 - 163 posts
Mueller Investagation Is Over
Mon, July 22, 2019 20:45 - 894 posts
Countdown Clock to Trumps impeachment " STARTS"
Mon, July 22, 2019 20:39 - 2807 posts
The 4-Squad Ultra-Racist Anti-American Unpatriotic Bimbos.
Mon, July 22, 2019 20:33 - 11 posts
Who Is Running In 2020?
Mon, July 22, 2019 15:57 - 132 posts
Evidence: So where are we now(II) ?
Mon, July 22, 2019 15:47 - 763 posts
The Most Racist U.S. Presidents
Mon, July 22, 2019 15:28 - 1 posts
How Iran Manufactures War Against Trump
Mon, July 22, 2019 15:09 - 2 posts
Dow @ 20K. Time to jump off!
Mon, July 22, 2019 14:58 - 920 posts
A thread for Democrats Only
Mon, July 22, 2019 13:20 - 2576 posts
People?
Mon, July 22, 2019 11:46 - 9 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL