Quote:

---

Originally posted by captaincrunch:
I've heard some talk of "resigning." With the new criminal exposure for Trump Foundation and Organization and the parade of flippers, people are noticing how the Trump vermin are now left out in the open. Would he quit to protect them? Or throw them under the bus and let them do time? Would resigning protect them even? Could he make a deal that would protect them "for the good of the country??"
And, is it better for the Dems to have the nation keep witnessing Trump's public implosion and the GOP's complete worthlessness, something an impeachment might take away? As hard as it is to imagine, Trump on trial might actually make him seem sympathetic... I know, super hard to believe!

---

Trump would throw his own family under the bus to protect himself. We may actually get to see him do that.

T

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
I think it's great. We get to witness all that you said as well as continually witnessing how juvenile, petty and hypocritical the Left is about everything too.


This government needs an enema.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THGRRI:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THGRRI:

Did Trump sanction Flynns discussions with Russia at the very time Putin was hacking us and trying to have an influence on our election? Just this morning Flynn tweeted "scapegoat"

---

How many days did your "Countdown Clock" have on it? It's been 98 days now. Or are you planning on a 3,000 Day Countdown?

---

It depends on what charge leads the way and how long it takes to compile a case. I think it will most likely be corruption charges. Perhaps tax fraud or money laundering. Trumps actions have allowed for the investigation to go anywhere Trump exhibited questionable behavior. Do you remember Ken Starr? The Clinton investigation started out looking into a real estate deal. Clinton wound up being impeached for lying about an affair.

Trump better be innocent of any wrong doing, anywhere, anytime. Are you willing to put money on that?

---

T

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
I think it's great. We get to witness all that you said as well as continually witnessing how juvenile, petty and hypocritical the Left is about everything too.


This government needs an enema.

---

You finally understand the meaning of Draining The Swamp.

And you see he is doing it, too.

Although Trump, Manafort, have not committed any crimes since 2014 (lifelong Democrat Cohen has not committed any crimes since becoming Republican in 2017 - after Tax Evasion for 5 years 2012-2016 as Democrat), watching Libtards display their hypocrisy can be gratifying.
Knowing that Hilliary's Gang of Criminals and Thugs have obviously committed scores of Felonies and Treasons, their pretext is that they haven't noticed.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:
Fewer than three-in-ten voters are convinced that Trump himself is not implicated in the wrongdoing of the six of his associates who have now either been convicted of crimes or have pled guilty.

T

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by captaincrunch:
I've heard some talk of "resigning." With the new criminal exposure for Trump Foundation and Organization and the parade of flippers, people are noticing how the Trump vermin are now left out in the open. Would he quit to protect them? Or throw them under the bus and let them do time? Would resigning protect them even? Could he make a deal that would protect them "for the good of the country??"
And, is it better for the Dems to have the nation keep witnessing Trump's public implosion and the GOP's complete worthlessness, something an impeachment might take away? As hard as it is to imagine, Trump on trial might actually make him seem sympathetic... I know, super hard to believe!

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:
Jack wants cites. The same Jack that claims all mainstream media is fake news. Now that's ironic. Isn't that ironic? I think that's ironic. What a fucking moron. Thanks for the laugh Jack.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1kiki:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by captaincrunch:
I've heard some talk of "resigning." With the new criminal exposure for Trump Foundation and Organization and the parade of flippers, people are noticing how the Trump vermin are now left out in the open. Would he quit to protect them? Or throw them under the bus and let them do time? Would resigning protect them even? Could he make a deal that would protect them "for the good of the country??"
And, is it better for the Dems to have the nation keep witnessing Trump's public implosion and the GOP's complete worthlessness, something an impeachment might take away? As hard as it is to imagine, Trump on trial might actually make him seem sympathetic... I know, super hard to believe!

---

A sitting President can't be indicted on criminal charges. If Trump has a plan, why should he quit when he has a tremendous grace period to continue his work?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:

Jack wants cites. The same Jack that claims all mainstream media is fake news. Now that's ironic. Isn't that ironic? I think that's ironic. What a fucking moron. Thanks for the laugh Jack.

---

It was really a rhetorical question thrown your way. I'm confident that there aren't any seriously unbiased sites that would back up your statistic that you pulled out of your ass there.

One would imagine that any site that does back up that claim today is one of the very same sites that had Hillary winning by a landslide 2 years ago at this time.

Just because you don't demand better from your mainstream media doesn't mean that everybody can just go around throwing out false statements and expect to be taken seriously when they do.

And by the way man... why so angry and mean all the time? You really need to relax.

---

"And fewer than three-in-ten voters are convinced that Trump himself is not implicated in the wrongdoing of the six of his associates who have now either been convicted of crimes or have pleaded guilty."

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/first-read/nbc-wsj-poll-trump-approva
l-remarkably-stable-after-stormy-week-n903626

It's just to easy proving you to be a moron Jack. Thanks for continuing to give me so many opportunities.


T

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:

Jack wants cites. The same Jack that claims all mainstream media is fake news. Now that's ironic. Isn't that ironic? I think that's ironic. What a fucking moron. Thanks for the laugh Jack.

---

It was really a rhetorical question thrown your way. I'm confident that there aren't any seriously unbiased sites that would back up your statistic that you pulled out of your ass there.

One would imagine that any site that does back up that claim today is one of the very same sites that had Hillary winning by a landslide 2 years ago at this time.

Just because you don't demand better from your mainstream media doesn't mean that everybody can just go around throwing out false statements and expect to be taken seriously when they do.

And by the way man... why so angry and mean all the time? You really need to relax.

---

"And fewer than three-in-ten voters are convinced that Trump himself is not implicated in the wrongdoing of the six of his associates who have now either been convicted of crimes or have pleaded guilty."

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/first-read/nbc-wsj-poll-trump-approva
l-remarkably-stable-after-stormy-week-n903626

It's just to easy proving you to be a moron Jack. Thanks for continuing to give me so many opportunities.


T

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:
With you and others here Jack it's always, first it's this, others respond, then it's that. That's what trolls and malcontents do. All the information in that post and again you are incapable of ascertaining anything from it.

T

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:
With you and others here Jack it's always, first it's this, others respond, then it's that. That's what trolls and malcontents do. All the information in that post and again you are incapable of ascertaining anything from it.

T

---

Your post here means nothing.

I showed you why the logic of the article is flawed.

If you disagree with it, then prove me wrong.

Giving everybody here your opinions and your personal thoughts about me is not a valid argument.

---

OK. Every once in a while I don't mind taking you to school, rather than ignore the ignorance you spew. The section I've quoted twice and now for the third time goes like this. "But the stability in Trump's approval rating also comes as more than half of voters say he has not been honest and truthful regarding the ongoing investigation by special counsel Robert Mueller. And fewer than three-in-ten voters are convinced that Trump himself is not implicated in the wrongdoing of the six of his associates who have now either been convicted of crimes or have pleaded guilty."

Now look at the section I've underlined. It says fewer than three in ten voters Jack. Not three in ten democratic voters as you've suggested. Another key word Jack is fewer. That means less than three in ten are convinced that Trump is not implicated in wrong doing.

Dummy...

T

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:

Now look at the section I've underlined. It says fewer than three in ten voters Jack. Not three in ten democratic voters as you've suggested. Another key word Jack is fewer. That means less than three in ten are convinced that Trump is not implicated in wrong doing.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:
With you and others here Jack it's always, first it's this, others respond, then it's that. That's what trolls and malcontents do. All the information in that post and again you are incapable of ascertaining anything from it.

T

---

Your post here means nothing.

I showed you why the logic of the article is flawed.

If you disagree with it, then prove me wrong.

Giving everybody here your opinions and your personal thoughts about me is not a valid argument.

---

OK. Every once in a while I don't mind taking you to school, rather than ignore the ignorance you spew. The section I've quoted twice and now for the third time goes like this. "But the stability in Trump's approval rating also comes as more than half of voters say he has not been honest and truthful regarding the ongoing investigation by special counsel Robert Mueller. And fewer than three-in-ten voters are convinced that Trump himself is not implicated in the wrongdoing of the six of his associates who have now either been convicted of crimes or have pleaded guilty."

Now look at the section I've underlined. It says fewer than three in ten voters Jack. Not three in ten democratic voters as you've suggested. Another key word Jack is fewer. That means less than three in ten are convinced that Trump is not implicated in wrong doing.

Dummy...

T

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:
With you and others here Jack it's always, first it's this, others respond, then it's that. That's what trolls and malcontents do. All the information in that post and again you are incapable of ascertaining anything from it.

T

---

Your post here means nothing.

I showed you why the logic of the article is flawed.

If you disagree with it, then prove me wrong.

Giving everybody here your opinions and your personal thoughts about me is not a valid argument.

---

OK. Every once in a while I don't mind taking you to school, rather than ignore the ignorance you spew. The section I've quoted twice and now for the third time goes like this. "But the stability in Trump's approval rating also comes as more than half of voters say he has not been honest and truthful regarding the ongoing investigation by special counsel Robert Mueller. And fewer than three-in-ten voters are convinced that Trump himself is not implicated in the wrongdoing of the six of his associates who have now either been convicted of crimes or have pleaded guilty."

Now look at the section I've underlined. It says fewer than three in ten voters Jack. Not three in ten democratic voters as you've suggested. Another key word Jack is fewer. That means less than three in ten are convinced that Trump is not implicated in wrong doing.

Dummy...

T

---

The quote I put in there about Democrats is in the same article, and I only mention it because the article can't seem to make up its own mind about the facts. I didn't "suggest" it. The article you linked did.

I can't say I'm surprised that you didn't see it there after two supposed readings. I know your ADHD usually only allows you to read a headline, so congrats on actually getting as far as you did.

If you'd actually like to read the entire article you posted, I'll be happy to continue to discuss this with you. Until then, you have no argument.

And until you acknowledge you were wrong and the quote that I cited is in there and apologize for your insults, I know you haven't actually read the article.

Have a nice day. :)

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

Quote:

---

Jack

The only thing in the article that correlates with the quote you put here is this other quote:

Quote:

---

Among Democrats, 71 percent say that Trump may be implicated in wrongdoing.

---

That right there changes the narrative entirely. The quote you put here should have read "Among Democrats, fewer than three-in-ten voters are convinced that Trump himself is not implicated in the wrongdoing of the six of his associates who have now either been convicted of crimes or have pleaded guilty.

---

Wrong. I am quoting you above.

Dummy...



T

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:
With you and others here Jack it's always, first it's this, others respond, then it's that. That's what trolls and malcontents do. All the information in that post and again you are incapable of ascertaining anything from it.

T

---

Your post here means nothing.

I showed you why the logic of the article is flawed.

If you disagree with it, then prove me wrong.

Giving everybody here your opinions and your personal thoughts about me is not a valid argument.

---

OK. Every once in a while I don't mind taking you to school, rather than ignore the ignorance you spew. The section I've quoted twice and now for the third time goes like this. "But the stability in Trump's approval rating also comes as more than half of voters say he has not been honest and truthful regarding the ongoing investigation by special counsel Robert Mueller. And fewer than three-in-ten voters are convinced that Trump himself is not implicated in the wrongdoing of the six of his associates who have now either been convicted of crimes or have pleaded guilty."

Now look at the section I've underlined. It says fewer than three in ten voters Jack. Not three in ten democratic voters as you've suggested. Another key word Jack is fewer. That means less than three in ten are convinced that Trump is not implicated in wrong doing.

Dummy...

T

---

The quote I put in there about Democrats is in the same article, and I only mention it because the article can't seem to make up its own mind about the facts. I didn't "suggest" it. The article you linked did.

I can't say I'm surprised that you didn't see it there after two supposed readings. I know your ADHD usually only allows you to read a headline, so congrats on actually getting as far as you did.

If you'd actually like to read the entire article you posted, I'll be happy to continue to discuss this with you. Until then, you have no argument.

And until you acknowledge you were wrong and the quote that I cited is in there and apologize for your insults, I know you haven't actually read the article.

Have a nice day. :)

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

Quote:

---

Jack

The only thing in the article that correlates with the quote you put here is this other quote:

Quote:

---

Among Democrats, 71 percent say that Trump may be implicated in wrongdoing.

---

That right there changes the narrative entirely. The quote you put here should have read "Among Democrats, fewer than three-in-ten voters are convinced that Trump himself is not implicated in the wrongdoing of the six of his associates who have now either been convicted of crimes or have pleaded guilty.

---

Wrong. I am quoting you above.

Dummy...



T

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1kiki:
Why should he quit when he can take his time waiting for an impeachment - AND REMOVAL FROM OFFICE - which will not happen in his first term?

You keep making bogus statements that you have to abandon with your very next bogus statement. At this point, I'm just going to flag them as bogus and not bother responding in particular.

THUGGER admits it's not about RUSSIA !!! and is, in fact, a witch hunt. "Trump better be innocent of any wrong doing, anywhere, anytime."

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:
With you and others here Jack it's always, first it's this, others respond, then it's that. That's what trolls and malcontents do. All the information in that post and again you are incapable of ascertaining anything from it.

T

---

Your post here means nothing.

I showed you why the logic of the article is flawed.

If you disagree with it, then prove me wrong.

Giving everybody here your opinions and your personal thoughts about me is not a valid argument.

---

OK. Every once in a while I don't mind taking you to school, rather than ignore the ignorance you spew. The section I've quoted twice and now for the third time goes like this. "But the stability in Trump's approval rating also comes as more than half of voters say he has not been honest and truthful regarding the ongoing investigation by special counsel Robert Mueller. And fewer than three-in-ten voters are convinced that Trump himself is not implicated in the wrongdoing of the six of his associates who have now either been convicted of crimes or have pleaded guilty."

Now look at the section I've underlined. It says fewer than three in ten voters Jack. Not three in ten democratic voters as you've suggested. Another key word Jack is fewer. That means less than three in ten are convinced that Trump is not implicated in wrong doing.

Dummy...

T

---

The quote I put in there about Democrats is in the same article, and I only mention it because the article can't seem to make up its own mind about the facts. I didn't "suggest" it. The article you linked did.

I can't say I'm surprised that you didn't see it there after two supposed readings. I know your ADHD usually only allows you to read a headline, so congrats on actually getting as far as you did.

If you'd actually like to read the entire article you posted, I'll be happy to continue to discuss this with you. Until then, you have no argument.

And until you acknowledge you were wrong and the quote that I cited is in there and apologize for your insults, I know you haven't actually read the article.

Have a nice day. :)

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:
With you and others here Jack it's always, first it's this, others respond, then it's that. That's what trolls and malcontents do. All the information in that post and again you are incapable of ascertaining anything from it.

T

---

Your post here means nothing.

I showed you why the logic of the article is flawed.

If you disagree with it, then prove me wrong.

Giving everybody here your opinions and your personal thoughts about me is not a valid argument.

---

OK. Every once in a while I don't mind taking you to school, rather than ignore the ignorance you spew. The section I've quoted twice and now for the third time goes like this. "But the stability in Trump's approval rating also comes as more than half of voters say he has not been honest and truthful regarding the ongoing investigation by special counsel Robert Mueller. And fewer than three-in-ten voters are convinced that Trump himself is not implicated in the wrongdoing of the six of his associates who have now either been convicted of crimes or have pleaded guilty."

Now look at the section I've underlined. It says fewer than three in ten voters Jack. Not three in ten democratic voters as you've suggested. Another key word Jack is fewer. That means less than three in ten are convinced that Trump is not implicated in wrong doing.

Dummy...

T

---

The quote I put in there about Democrats is in the same article, and I only mention it because the article can't seem to make up its own mind about the facts. I didn't "suggest" it. The article you linked did.

I can't say I'm surprised that you didn't see it there after two supposed readings. I know your ADHD usually only allows you to read a headline, so congrats on actually getting as far as you did.

If you'd actually like to read the entire article you posted, I'll be happy to continue to discuss this with you. Until then, you have no argument.

And until you acknowledge you were wrong and the quote that I cited is in there and apologize for your insults, I know you haven't actually read the article.

Have a nice day. :)

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

Quote:

---

Jack

The only thing in the article that correlates with the quote you put here is this other quote:

Quote:

---

Among Democrats, 71 percent say that Trump may be implicated in wrongdoing.

---

That right there changes the narrative entirely. The quote you put here should have read "Among Democrats, fewer than three-in-ten voters are convinced that Trump himself is not implicated in the wrongdoing of the six of his associates who have now either been convicted of crimes or have pleaded guilty.

---

Wrong. I am quoting you above.

Dummy...



T

---

Yup. So you are.

I quoted that from the article that you linked.

Read it for the first time, since you obviously haven't read it yet and then we'll have a discussion.


Nice guy that I am, I'll even give you a hint. It's about 12 to 14 paragraphs down from the beginning of the article.


You do realize that you can scroll down and read more, right? They even have these great computer mice with scroll buttons so you don't have to manually use the scroll bars.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:
With you and others here Jack it's always, first it's this, others respond, then it's that. That's what trolls and malcontents do. All the information in that post and again you are incapable of ascertaining anything from it.

T

---

Your post here means nothing.

I showed you why the logic of the article is flawed.

If you disagree with it, then prove me wrong.

Giving everybody here your opinions and your personal thoughts about me is not a valid argument.

---

OK. Every once in a while I don't mind taking you to school, rather than ignore the ignorance you spew. The section I've quoted twice and now for the third time goes like this. "But the stability in Trump's approval rating also comes as more than half of voters say he has not been honest and truthful regarding the ongoing investigation by special counsel Robert Mueller. And fewer than three-in-ten voters are convinced that Trump himself is not implicated in the wrongdoing of the six of his associates who have now either been convicted of crimes or have pleaded guilty."

Now look at the section I've underlined. It says fewer than three in ten voters Jack. Not three in ten democratic voters as you've suggested. Another key word Jack is fewer. That means less than three in ten are convinced that Trump is not implicated in wrong doing.

Dummy...

T

---

The quote I put in there about Democrats is in the same article, and I only mention it because the article can't seem to make up its own mind about the facts. I didn't "suggest" it. The article you linked did.

I can't say I'm surprised that you didn't see it there after two supposed readings. I know your ADHD usually only allows you to read a headline, so congrats on actually getting as far as you did.

If you'd actually like to read the entire article you posted, I'll be happy to continue to discuss this with you. Until then, you have no argument.

And until you acknowledge you were wrong and the quote that I cited is in there and apologize for your insults, I know you haven't actually read the article.

Have a nice day. :)

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

Quote:

---

Jack

The only thing in the article that correlates with the quote you put here is this other quote:

Quote:

---

Among Democrats, 71 percent say that Trump may be implicated in wrongdoing.

---

That right there changes the narrative entirely. The quote you put here should have read "Among Democrats, fewer than three-in-ten voters are convinced that Trump himself is not implicated in the wrongdoing of the six of his associates who have now either been convicted of crimes or have pleaded guilty.

---

Wrong. I am quoting you above.

Dummy...



T

---

Yup. So you are.

I quoted that from the article that you linked.

Read it for the first time, since you obviously haven't read it yet and then we'll have a discussion.


Nice guy that I am, I'll even give you a hint. It's about 12 to 14 paragraphs down from the beginning of the article.


You do realize that you can scroll down and read more, right? They even have these great computer mice with scroll buttons so you don't have to manually use the scroll bars.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

And you wonder why I call you moron. Read it again yourself. You've linked two things together that should not be linked. What a fucking ass.

T

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1kiki:Let's say I run a poll and the results are: 1/3 think the earth is flat, 1/3 think the earth is a globe, and 1/3 aren't sure.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:
With you and others here Jack it's always, first it's this, others respond, then it's that. That's what trolls and malcontents do. All the information in that post and again you are incapable of ascertaining anything from it.

T

---

Your post here means nothing.

I showed you why the logic of the article is flawed.

If you disagree with it, then prove me wrong.

Giving everybody here your opinions and your personal thoughts about me is not a valid argument.

---

OK. Every once in a while I don't mind taking you to school, rather than ignore the ignorance you spew. The section I've quoted twice and now for the third time goes like this. "But the stability in Trump's approval rating also comes as more than half of voters say he has not been honest and truthful regarding the ongoing investigation by special counsel Robert Mueller. And fewer than three-in-ten voters are convinced that Trump himself is not implicated in the wrongdoing of the six of his associates who have now either been convicted of crimes or have pleaded guilty."

Now look at the section I've underlined. It says fewer than three in ten voters Jack. Not three in ten democratic voters as you've suggested. Another key word Jack is fewer. That means less than three in ten are convinced that Trump is not implicated in wrong doing.

Dummy...

T

---

The quote I put in there about Democrats is in the same article, and I only mention it because the article can't seem to make up its own mind about the facts. I didn't "suggest" it. The article you linked did.

I can't say I'm surprised that you didn't see it there after two supposed readings. I know your ADHD usually only allows you to read a headline, so congrats on actually getting as far as you did.

If you'd actually like to read the entire article you posted, I'll be happy to continue to discuss this with you. Until then, you have no argument.

And until you acknowledge you were wrong and the quote that I cited is in there and apologize for your insults, I know you haven't actually read the article.

Have a nice day. :)

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

Quote:

---

Jack

The only thing in the article that correlates with the quote you put here is this other quote:

Quote:

---

Among Democrats, 71 percent say that Trump may be implicated in wrongdoing.

---

That right there changes the narrative entirely. The quote you put here should have read "Among Democrats, fewer than three-in-ten voters are convinced that Trump himself is not implicated in the wrongdoing of the six of his associates who have now either been convicted of crimes or have pleaded guilty.

---

Wrong. I am quoting you above.

Dummy...



T

---

Yup. So you are.

I quoted that from the article that you linked.

Read it for the first time, since you obviously haven't read it yet and then we'll have a discussion.


Nice guy that I am, I'll even give you a hint. It's about 12 to 14 paragraphs down from the beginning of the article.


You do realize that you can scroll down and read more, right? They even have these great computer mice with scroll buttons so you don't have to manually use the scroll bars.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

And you wonder why I call you moron. Read it again yourself. You've linked two things together that should not be linked. What a fucking ass.

T

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:
With you and others here Jack it's always, first it's this, others respond, then it's that. That's what trolls and malcontents do. All the information in that post and again you are incapable of ascertaining anything from it.

T

---

Your post here means nothing.

I showed you why the logic of the article is flawed.

If you disagree with it, then prove me wrong.

Giving everybody here your opinions and your personal thoughts about me is not a valid argument.

---

OK. Every once in a while I don't mind taking you to school, rather than ignore the ignorance you spew. The section I've quoted twice and now for the third time goes like this. "But the stability in Trump's approval rating also comes as more than half of voters say he has not been honest and truthful regarding the ongoing investigation by special counsel Robert Mueller. And fewer than three-in-ten voters are convinced that Trump himself is not implicated in the wrongdoing of the six of his associates who have now either been convicted of crimes or have pleaded guilty."

Now look at the section I've underlined. It says fewer than three in ten voters Jack. Not three in ten democratic voters as you've suggested. Another key word Jack is fewer. That means less than three in ten are convinced that Trump is not implicated in wrong doing.

Dummy...

T

---

The quote I put in there about Democrats is in the same article, and I only mention it because the article can't seem to make up its own mind about the facts. I didn't "suggest" it. The article you linked did.

I can't say I'm surprised that you didn't see it there after two supposed readings. I know your ADHD usually only allows you to read a headline, so congrats on actually getting as far as you did.

If you'd actually like to read the entire article you posted, I'll be happy to continue to discuss this with you. Until then, you have no argument.

And until you acknowledge you were wrong and the quote that I cited is in there and apologize for your insults, I know you haven't actually read the article.

Have a nice day. :)

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

Quote:

---

Jack

The only thing in the article that correlates with the quote you put here is this other quote:

Quote:

---

Among Democrats, 71 percent say that Trump may be implicated in wrongdoing.

---

That right there changes the narrative entirely. The quote you put here should have read "Among Democrats, fewer than three-in-ten voters are convinced that Trump himself is not implicated in the wrongdoing of the six of his associates who have now either been convicted of crimes or have pleaded guilty.

---

Wrong. I am quoting you above.

Dummy...



T

---

Yup. So you are.

I quoted that from the article that you linked.

Read it for the first time, since you obviously haven't read it yet and then we'll have a discussion.


Nice guy that I am, I'll even give you a hint. It's about 12 to 14 paragraphs down from the beginning of the article.


You do realize that you can scroll down and read more, right? They even have these great computer mice with scroll buttons so you don't have to manually use the scroll bars.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

And you wonder why I call you moron. Read it again yourself. You've linked two things together that should not be linked. What a fucking ass.

T

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JO753:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1kiki:Let's say I run a poll and the results are: 1/3 think the earth is flat, 1/3 think the earth is a globe, and 1/3 aren't sure.

---

You forgot the .1% hoo think the Earth iz a cube.

----------------------------
DUZ XaT SEM RiT TQ YQ? - Jubal Early

http://www.7532020.com

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:
Someday we may want a president who knows what he’s talking about.

---

Quote:

---

The Case Against Impeaching Trump
- Alan Dershowitz

Alan Dershowitz has been called “one of the most prominent and consistent defenders of civil liberties in America” by Politico and “the nation’s most peripatetic civil liberties lawyer and one of its most distinguished defenders of individual rights” by Newsweek. Yet he has come under partisan fire for applying those same principles to Donald Trump during the course of his many appearances in national media outlets as an expert resource on civil and constitutional law...

“In the fervor to impeach President Trump, his political enemies have ignored the text of the Constitution. As a civil libertarian who voted against Trump, I remind those who would impeach him not to run roughshod over a document that has protected us all for two and a quarter centuries. In this case against impeachment, I make arguments similar to those I made against the impeachment of President Bill Clinton (and that I would be making had Hillary Clinton been elected and Republicans were seeking to impeach her). Impeachment and removal of a president are not entirely political decisions by Congress. Every member takes an oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States, and the Constitution sets out specific substantive criteria that MUST be met.

---

Quote:

---

Jack wants cites. The same Jack that claims all mainstream media is fake news. Now that's ironic. Isn't that ironic? I think that's ironic. What a fucking moron. Thanks for the laugh Jack.

T

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

Quote:

---

Jack wants cites. The same Jack that claims all mainstream media is fake news. Now that's ironic. Isn't that ironic? I think that's ironic. What a fucking moron. Thanks for the laugh Jack.

T

---

Somebody doth protest too much.
Protesting request of cites.
Suggesting cites can only come from Fake News sources.
Failing to comprehend that admission that no valid cites or sources exist.

---

Here we go folks. Moron number two. Have someone you know with half a brain explain to you what my post means. Your response shows me you don't have a clue.

T

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

Quote:

---

Jack wants cites. The same Jack that claims all mainstream media is fake news. Now that's ironic. Isn't that ironic? I think that's ironic. What a fucking moron. Thanks for the laugh Jack.

T

---

Somebody doth protest too much.
Protesting request of cites.
Suggesting cites can only come from Fake News sources.
Failing to comprehend that admission that no valid cites or sources exist.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

Only 2,429 days remaining on the Impeachment Clock.

How exciting. 001286

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

Only 2,429 days remaining on the Impeachment Clock.

How exciting. 001286

---

Imperious, impatient and immature, Donald Trump is the King Baby of presidents, a man who is incapable of rising to the demands of the most important job on earth.

How exciting!

---

59 days, tick tock

T

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:
59 days, tick tock

T

---