Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1KIKI:
How MANY baloney (bullshit) rules do your posts violate?
http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=63460
Carl Sagan's Baloney Detection Kit

Wherever possible there must be independent confirmation of the facts.

Encourage substantive debate on the evidence by knowledgeable proponents of all points of view.

Arguments from authority carry little weight (in science there are no "authorities").

Spin more than one hypothesis - don't simply run with the first idea that caught your fancy.

Try not to get overly attached to a hypothesis just because it's yours.

Quantify, wherever possible.

If there is a chain of argument every link in the chain must work.

Occam's razor - if there are two hypotheses that explain the data equally well choose the simpler.

Ask whether the hypothesis can, at least in principle, be falsified (shown to be false by some unambiguous test). In other words, it is testable? Can others duplicate the experiment and get the same result?

http://carlsagan.com/index_ideascontent.htm

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1KIKI:
How MANY baloney (bullshit) rules do your posts violate?
http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=63460
Carl Sagan's Baloney Detection Kit

Wherever possible there must be independent confirmation of the facts.

Encourage substantive debate on the evidence by knowledgeable proponents of all points of view.

Arguments from authority carry little weight (in science there are no "authorities").

Spin more than one hypothesis - don't simply run with the first idea that caught your fancy.

Try not to get overly attached to a hypothesis just because it's yours.

Quantify, wherever possible.

If there is a chain of argument every link in the chain must work.

Occam's razor - if there are two hypotheses that explain the data equally well choose the simpler.

Ask whether the hypothesis can, at least in principle, be falsified (shown to be false by some unambiguous test). In other words, it is testable? Can others duplicate the experiment and get the same result?

http://carlsagan.com/index_ideascontent.htm



Belief is for wimps and mental midgets!

---

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1KIKI:
You mean you can't stand an actual - yanno - discussion, and all you can do is troll?

Belief is for wimps and mental midgets!

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1KIKI:

How MANY baloney (bullshit) rules do your posts violate?
www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=63460
Carl Sagan's Baloney Detection Kit

---

1kiki, that Carl Sagan checklist you keep quoting is for deciding larger questions...

You post a long post kiki, someone responds, you repost it. Sometimes over and over. That's not having a discussion. That's trolling and you do it all the time. You and sig also post shit a mile long that nobody is going to read. My idea is that you guys post that shit here. I don't see you two doing that in your own threads comrade.

T

Deep state describes dedicated, educated professionals.

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Leave your cancer in your own threads.

---

Exactly...Hey we agree.

T

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Leave your cancer in your own threads.

---

Exactly...Hey we agree.

T

Deep state describes dedicated, educated professionals.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Leave your cancer in your own threads.

---

Exactly...Hey we agree.

T

Deep state describes dedicated, educated professionals.

---

I'm talking about you. Everything you do and say is cancerous.

Keep it in your own threads.

---

I don't think they're listening to you Jack.

T

Deep state describes dedicated, educated professionals.

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1KIKI:
Hey all! ... just saying hey.

And fwiw I have a doozy of a cough. It's been incubating for a week, when I woke up with red, gummy eyes. I cough so much, so hard, I have a nasty headache. My trachea and bronchi hurt. And I have an earache and stuffy nose on top of it all.

I think I'm going to go back to bed.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1KIKI:
Hey all! ... just saying hey.

And fwiw I have a doozy of a cough. It's been incubating for a week, when I woke up with red, gummy eyes. I cough so much, so hard, I have a nasty headache. My trachea and bronchi hurt. And I have an earache and stuffy nose on top of it all.

I think I'm going to go back to bed.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
BTW... How did that weed killer work out for you Sigs?

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
BTW... How did that weed killer work out for you Sigs?

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

Well, it worked, sort of. After a couple of warm sunny days I could see some weeds dying back ... but only some weeds and only if they were in the sun. The filaree and pineapple weed were very susceptible, but the as far as the cheeseweed and grasses ... as far as they were concerned I may as well have fertilized them. Not comfortable spraying a lot of chemicals in the yard because of the dog and all of the friendly critters that come to visit so I'm planning to use a weed torch. I just need to find out what kind of propane supply and at what price, plus I need to decide whether I want the big 400,000 btu one, the 100,000 btu one, or the 20,000 btu one. The advantage of the smaller one is that you can spot-weed more effectively, the disadvantage is that it takes a lot longer to cover the same square footage because the flame size is so much smaller. I think I need a big one, I have a lot of square feet to cover.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1KIKI:
Hey, thanks for the well-wishes! This flu landed on me HARD. I can't remember the last time I was this sick. Well, I'm still a bit wobbly and shivery, and disinclined to get up and do much. So I just wanted to say HI, and thanks! for your posts, before I go back to bed.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1KIKI:
I can't help but notice that your posts are 100% baloney.

http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=63460

Carl Sagan's Baloney Detection Kit



Wherever possible there must be independent confirmation of the facts.

Encourage substantive debate on the evidence by knowledgeable proponents of all points of view.

Arguments from authority carry little weight (in science there are no "authorities").

Spin more than one hypothesis - don't simply run with the first idea that caught your fancy.

Try not to get overly attached to a hypothesis just because it's yours.

Quantify, wherever possible.

If there is a chain of argument every link in the chain must work.

Occam's razor - if there are two hypotheses that explain the data equally well choose the simpler.

Ask whether the hypothesis can, at least in principle, be falsified (shown to be false by some unambiguous test). In other words, it is testable? Can others duplicate the experiment and get the same result?

http://carlsagan.com/index_ideascontent.htm

Belief is for wimps and mental midgets!

---

So, my question is, are you sure you're sick? Do you have all the facts?

T

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

What are you? Like 10 years old? That would explain a lot

---

kiki keeps reposting in over and over again. I will too.

T

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

What are you? Like 10 years old? That would explain a lot

---

kiki keeps reposting in over and over again. I will too.

T

Deep state describes dedicated, educated professionals.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

What are you? Like 10 years old? That would explain a lot

---

kiki keeps reposting in over and over again. I will too.

T

---

Are you 10 years old and drunk too?

That reply doesn't make any sense.

---

It makes sense to anyone with an IQ above 60 or so. Do you have an IQ above 60?

T

Deep state describes dedicated, educated professionals.

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

What are you? Like 10 years old? That would explain a lot

---

kiki keeps reposting in over and over again. I will too.

T

---

Are you 10 years old and drunk too?

That reply doesn't make any sense.

---

It makes sense to anyone with an IQ above 60 or so. Do you have an IQ above 60?

T

Deep state describes dedicated, educated professionals.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

What are you? Like 10 years old? That would explain a lot

---

kiki keeps reposting in over and over again. I will too.

T

---

Are you 10 years old and drunk too?

That reply doesn't make any sense.

---

It makes sense to anyone with an IQ above 60 or so. Do you have an IQ above 60?

T

Deep state describes dedicated, educated professionals.

---

Did you mean "it". You typed "in". You didn't mean "it", did you? You're aware of the fact that "it" and "in" are two entirely different words, aren't you?

lol

Moron.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

Forgive me if my cat climbing onto my lap causes a mistype. Or, that I even have a mistype. Oh my god what will I do! That said, I'll post in this thread as long as you want. Figure it out dummy.

T

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THG:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

What are you? Like 10 years old? That would explain a lot

---

kiki keeps reposting in over and over again. I will too.

T

---

Are you 10 years old and drunk too?

That reply doesn't make any sense.

---

It makes sense to anyone with an IQ above 60 or so. Do you have an IQ above 60?

T

Deep state describes dedicated, educated professionals.

---

Did you mean "it". You typed "in". You didn't mean "it", did you? You're aware of the fact that "it" and "in" are two entirely different words, aren't you?

lol

Moron.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

Forgive me if my cat climbing onto my lap causes a mistype. Or, that I even have a mistype. Oh my god what will I do! That said, I'll post in this thread as long as you want. Figure it out dummy.

T

Deep state describes dedicated, educated professionals.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
A few days later and the fridge is still running better than ever before.

Nice that you'll be getting a warm weekend, Brenda. Pretty nice around here right now, but our weekend is going to be frigid... probably the coldest we've seen all season.

I can't complain too much though. It's the middle of January and except for Halloween and early November it's been an unseasonably warm winter with very little precipitation.

---

As I've said. I'll stay and chat with you in this thread as long as you wish. Every time you post to me you give me license to return. Thanks gack...

T

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

It's a free country. You're free to act as childish as you'd like. Don't let me stop you.

---

I see you've renewed my license. Thanks...

T

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THUGGER:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1KIKI:
I can't help but notice that your posts are 100% baloney.

http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=63460

Carl Sagan's Baloney Detection Kit



Wherever possible there must be independent confirmation of the facts.

Encourage substantive debate on the evidence by knowledgeable proponents of all points of view.

Arguments from authority carry little weight (in science there are no "authorities").

Spin more than one hypothesis - don't simply run with the first idea that caught your fancy.

Try not to get overly attached to a hypothesis just because it's yours.

Quantify, wherever possible.

If there is a chain of argument every link in the chain must work.

Occam's razor - if there are two hypotheses that explain the data equally well choose the simpler.

Ask whether the hypothesis can, at least in principle, be falsified (shown to be false by some unambiguous test). In other words, it is testable? Can others duplicate the experiment and get the same result?

http://carlsagan.com/index_ideascontent.htm

Belief is for wimps and mental midgets!

---

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
A few days later and the fridge is still running better than ever before.

Nice that you'll be getting a warm weekend, Brenda. Pretty nice around here right now, but our weekend is going to be frigid... probably the coldest we've seen all season.

I can't complain too much though. It's the middle of January and except for Halloween and early November it's been an unseasonably warm winter with very little precipitation.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1KIKI:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THUGGER:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1KIKI:
I can't help but notice that your posts are 100% baloney.

http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=63460

Carl Sagan's Baloney Detection Kit



Wherever possible there must be independent confirmation of the facts.

Encourage substantive debate on the evidence by knowledgeable proponents of all points of view.

Arguments from authority carry little weight (in science there are no "authorities").

Spin more than one hypothesis - don't simply run with the first idea that caught your fancy.

Try not to get overly attached to a hypothesis just because it's yours.

Quantify, wherever possible.

If there is a chain of argument every link in the chain must work.

Occam's razor - if there are two hypotheses that explain the data equally well choose the simpler.

Ask whether the hypothesis can, at least in principle, be falsified (shown to be false by some unambiguous test). In other words, it is testable? Can others duplicate the experiment and get the same result?

http://carlsagan.com/index_ideascontent.htm

Belief is for wimps and mental midgets!

---

---

Since you seem to be too mentally or morally incapably of using Sagan's 'baloney' detection kit, or even to understand or admit what the words in it mean ('evidence' has never been a viable concept for you), the next time I post Sagan's kit, I'll spell out all they ways you're deficient. Now, you may be too incapable or corrupt to admit your deficiencies, but I'm sure everyone else will manage to understand.

BTW, keep posting here just because you can't address my posts in their relevant threads. I'm sure you generate all sorts of illwill, and convince absolutely nobody by doing that.

So, NOT such a GREAT LIFE CHOICE! But I'm sure it matches your other fear-driven life choices that make you such a useful idiot.



Belief is for wimps and mental midgets!

---

Hey, I love Sagan. I just don't like you reposting it over and over again when some else posts on the thread after you. Trolling kiki, you're just trolling.

T

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1KIKI:
Just because someone ignores a post doesn't make it less true, topical, and worthwhile. So I'll repost anything that's true, topical, and worthwhile because it deserves a true, topical, and worthwhile reply. And the fact that it's true, topical, and worthwhile makes it NOT TROLLING.


And I'll feel free to repost something that's true, topical, and worthwhile, despite your attempts at extortion - which btw is blatantly obvious to everyone else, no matter how much you try and disguise it.

But, I'm with Jack. Feel free to make enemies and convince no one. I'm sure it goes along with your other horrible life choices.

---

I disagree but I'm more than willing to further our discussion.

T

Quote:

---

I disagree but I'm more than willing to further our discussion.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1KIKI:

Quote:

---

I disagree but I'm more than willing to further our discussion.

---

There is no discussion. A discussion would resembling something like Sagan's baloney detection kit http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=63460 - facts, evidence, multiple hypotheses, and so on.

What we had was a simple exchange of opinions. We each stated ours*. End of story.

But feel free to continue on, and reap your rewards.

* If you're unsure of the difference between opinion and fact, I suggest you bone up on it.

Belief is for wimps and mental midgets!

---

No no, I see we still disagree. You have yet to make a valid point.

T

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1KIKI:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by THUGGER:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1KIKI:
I can't help but notice that your posts are 100% baloney.

http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=63460

Carl Sagan's Baloney Detection Kit



Wherever possible there must be independent confirmation of the facts.

Encourage substantive debate on the evidence by knowledgeable proponents of all points of view.

Arguments from authority carry little weight (in science there are no "authorities").

Spin more than one hypothesis - don't simply run with the first idea that caught your fancy.

Try not to get overly attached to a hypothesis just because it's yours.

Quantify, wherever possible.

If there is a chain of argument every link in the chain must work.

Occam's razor - if there are two hypotheses that explain the data equally well choose the simpler.

Ask whether the hypothesis can, at least in principle, be falsified (shown to be false by some unambiguous test). In other words, it is testable? Can others duplicate the experiment and get the same result?

http://carlsagan.com/index_ideascontent.htm

]Belief is for wimps and mental midgets!

---

---

Since you seem to be too mentally or morally incapably of using Sagan's 'baloney' detection kit, or even to understand or admit what the words in it mean ('evidence' has never been a viable concept for you), the next time I post Sagan's kit, I'll spell out all they ways you're deficient. Now, you may be too incapable or corrupt to admit your deficiencies, but I'm sure everyone else will manage to understand.

BTW, keep posting here just because you can't address my posts in their relevant threads. I'm sure you generate all sorts of illwill, and convince absolutely nobody by doing that.

So, NOT such a GREAT LIFE CHOICE! But I'm sure it matches your other fear-driven life choices that make you such a useful idiot.



Belief is for wimps and mental midgets!

---

As you've said. At times there is a need to repost a post until a proper answer to the post is provided. Maybe you should explain, in great detail, what Sagan's points and perspectives are. That might go a long way in explaining to me why you felt a need to post this a dozen times.

T

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Glad you're feeling better Kiki.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

Quote:

---

Since you seem to be too mentally or morally incapable of using Sagan's 'baloney' detection kit, or even to understand or admit what the words in it mean

---

Quote:

---

Maybe you should explain, in great detail, what Sagan's points and perspectives are.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1KIKI:

Quote:

---

Since you seem to be too mentally or morally incapable of using Sagan's 'baloney' detection kit, or even to understand or admit what the words in it mean

---

As predicted ...

Quote:

---

Maybe you should explain, in great detail, what Sagan's points and perspectives are.

---

---

Ah, I'm hurt. I learned this technique of trolling from two of the best. I'm hurt you don't acknowledge that. Tell me, how many times have you and sig done what I'm doing. Then told the poster to explain everything in great detail; hundreds, probably closer to thousands I bet?



T