Sign Up | Log In
REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS
In the garden, and RAIN!!!!
Saturday, October 9, 2021 1:08 AM
6IXSTRINGJACK
Quote:Originally posted by SIGNYM: Quote:I've got 3 aunts and a grandma who have died of breast cancer. I have one aunt who is still fighting against it. Unless they're all really good at keeping secrets, none of them had abortions. The chances that the 4 aunts all had abortions and nobody knew it are astronomically small. I'll bet my life that my grandma didn't. Women do die of breast cancer without having an abortion first. You do know this, right? P.S. Could you start another thread about this or something? I shouldn't have commented on it not once, but twice now. This is not the place. Sounds like you have a strong family history of breast cancer. There are two genes that, when mutated, are primarily responsible for breast cancer called ... appropriately... BRCA1 and BRCA2, but there are also 7 other genes associated with breast cancer. If I were you, I'd suggest that my female relatives get tested at least for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations, which bumps up cancer risk from an average of 13pct to a whopping 80pct! These genes are responsible for DNA repair, so if your DNA gets damaged it doesn't get fixed. This affects men, too. SIX, if you have a mutated BRCA1 gene, you have an 8pct lifetime risk of getting breast cancer (yes, men have breast tissue too) but if you have an abnormal BRCA2 gene your risk of prostate cancer is SEVEN TIMES normal. And since prostate cancer is the most common cancer among men (except for skin cancers), it could be a significant lifetime risk for you, too! ----------- Pity would be no more, If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
Quote:I've got 3 aunts and a grandma who have died of breast cancer. I have one aunt who is still fighting against it. Unless they're all really good at keeping secrets, none of them had abortions. The chances that the 4 aunts all had abortions and nobody knew it are astronomically small. I'll bet my life that my grandma didn't. Women do die of breast cancer without having an abortion first. You do know this, right? P.S. Could you start another thread about this or something? I shouldn't have commented on it not once, but twice now. This is not the place.
Saturday, October 9, 2021 3:26 AM
Quote:Originally posted by SIGNYM: Quote:Originally posted by Brenda: Quote:Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK: Enjoy it, Brenda. Getting toward that time a year again and we got to take them where we can get them. -------------------------------------------------- Vaccinated People: "You need to get muh vaccination shots that don't work because I got muh vaccination shots that don't work and I'm afraid of people that didn't get muh vaccination shots that don't work because muh vaccination shots that don't work don't work." Very true and I reckon by about 7pm this evening the clouds will really start rolling in and then rain. Trees are already short of their leaves. That sounds very autumnal. Too many days of gray skies with nothing to look at except bare leaves is so dreary. But, I do like those sunny, breezy autumn days. I hope you have many of those! And I still like snow. Having lived in socal almost since I graduated from university means I never got burned out in the experience of having to get back and forth to work in it and, at my age, shoveling snow was fun. The quiet landscapes and sparkling snow, and especially Xmas lights shining thru and on the snow made up for the blizzards, mush, ice, shoveling and general pain in the *assedness of winter. At my age, tho, I would probably want to escape. ----------- Pity would be no more, If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
Quote:Originally posted by Brenda: Quote:Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK: Enjoy it, Brenda. Getting toward that time a year again and we got to take them where we can get them. -------------------------------------------------- Vaccinated People: "You need to get muh vaccination shots that don't work because I got muh vaccination shots that don't work and I'm afraid of people that didn't get muh vaccination shots that don't work because muh vaccination shots that don't work don't work." Very true and I reckon by about 7pm this evening the clouds will really start rolling in and then rain. Trees are already short of their leaves.
Quote:Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK: Enjoy it, Brenda. Getting toward that time a year again and we got to take them where we can get them. -------------------------------------------------- Vaccinated People: "You need to get muh vaccination shots that don't work because I got muh vaccination shots that don't work and I'm afraid of people that didn't get muh vaccination shots that don't work because muh vaccination shots that don't work don't work."
Saturday, October 9, 2021 1:05 PM
BRENDA
Quote:Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK: Quote:Originally posted by SIGNYM: Quote:Originally posted by Brenda: Quote:Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK: Enjoy it, Brenda. Getting toward that time a year again and we got to take them where we can get them. -------------------------------------------------- Vaccinated People: "You need to get muh vaccination shots that don't work because I got muh vaccination shots that don't work and I'm afraid of people that didn't get muh vaccination shots that don't work because muh vaccination shots that don't work don't work." Very true and I reckon by about 7pm this evening the clouds will really start rolling in and then rain. Trees are already short of their leaves. That sounds very autumnal. Too many days of gray skies with nothing to look at except bare leaves is so dreary. But, I do like those sunny, breezy autumn days. I hope you have many of those! And I still like snow. Having lived in socal almost since I graduated from university means I never got burned out in the experience of having to get back and forth to work in it and, at my age, shoveling snow was fun. The quiet landscapes and sparkling snow, and especially Xmas lights shining thru and on the snow made up for the blizzards, mush, ice, shoveling and general pain in the *assedness of winter. At my age, tho, I would probably want to escape. ----------- Pity would be no more, If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake Today was the first day we had sun since last Friday. Even then, it was hard to enjoy it since when I went out running errands I had bright sun beating down in my eyes, but couldn't wear sunglasses because my wipers were also on while we were getting poured on at the same time. Did make for a beautiful rainbow to behold, ending right down the center line of my street when I got home though. I don't really mind fall except seeing how quickly the days get short and knowing what's coming. Especially hearing how expensive it's going to cost to heat this year. I'll probably be keeping it at a high of 58 this year, which I haven't done for 3 or 4 years now. -------------------------------------------------- Vaccinated People: "You need to get muh vaccination shots that don't work because I got muh vaccination shots that don't work and I'm afraid of people that didn't get muh vaccination shots that don't work because muh vaccination shots that don't work don't work."
Saturday, October 9, 2021 1:06 PM
Saturday, October 9, 2021 3:20 PM
JEWELSTAITEFAN
Quote:Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK: Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: Quote:Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK: Quote:Originally posted by SIGNYM: Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: Quote:Originally posted by 1KIKI: I was musing on the percent of US women who'll get breast cancer in their lifetime. For some reason I thought the figure was 1 in 10. But nah! I told myself. That's too high. So I looked it up. It's actually more than 1 in 10, it's almost 13% of all women. https://w ww.c ancer.gov/types/breast/risk-fact-sheet Based on current incidence rates, 12.9% of women born in the United States today will develop breast cancer at some time during their lives. About 16 per 1,000 women in America had abortions in 2018. It was 29.3 per 1,000 in the 80s. So in any 10 year span, more than 15% of women have abortions. But the breast cancer rate is only 13%. First pregnancy abortions were already known to be the highest correlation with breast cancer. Sounds like it still is the case, despite the denials from SJWs.FALSE https://www.cancer.gov/about-ca ncer/causes-prevention/risk/hormones/reproductive-history-fact-sheet By now, it should be pretty apparent that neither JSF or I or about 100,000 million other Americans trust anything the medical community has to say about anything. Throw a ".gov" on the end of that URL and the trust plummets even further. Although I finished with the fact that SJWs were denying it, I did not choose to include "cue denial by PC activist in 3...2...1..." Think I missed the opportunity? But the reply was right on que. And she even included the PC-scrubbed-of-inconvenient-facts linky which I implied but did not specify. Back when that correlation was first learned, there was a huge storm of PC funds being thrown at gobs of new "studies" with pre-conclusions to disprove the facts. Overwhelming resources to thwart the reality and facts. But the real world facts have continued to prove out the correlation known long ago. Almost funny, if it wasn't so sad. So much "anti-breast-cancer" money thrown at getting more women breast cancer, it is a shame.I ran across some more info. Even Breast Cancer activists are getting sloppy, letting slip some actual facts instead of their PC mantra. https://www.wcrf.org/dietandcancer/breast-cancer-statistics/ Of the nations with the highest rates of breast cancer, US apparently ranks 22nd. On that list, curious how you don't see Brazil, Poland, Columbia, Mexico, Spain, Israel. Israel seems, from what I gather, to encourage offspring. The rest of those are highly Catholic nations. Quote:In addition, the Panel judged there was strong evidence that lactation protects against breast cancer (unspecified menopausal status). And from https://www.wcrf.org/dietandcancer/breast-cancer/ another inconvenient fact: Quote:Oral contraceptives containing both oestrogen and progesterone also cause a small increased risk of breast cancer in young women https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rank ings/highest-catholic-population Of the 10 nations with the greatest Catholic Populations, only USA, France, and Italy are on the top 25 list for breast cancer. And that France entry might not count, not sure of the "metropolitan" notation - perhaps France as a whole does not rank in the top 25. These are the most aggressive abortion nations. Of the 10 nations with the greatest percentage of Catholics, only Italy ranks in the top 25 of breast cancer nations. Golly gee whiz, the nations with the lowest abortion rates also have the lowest breast cancer rates? Say it ain't so, Sally.I've got 3 aunts and a grandma who have died of breast cancer. I have one aunt who is still fighting against it. Unless they're all really good at keeping secrets, none of them had abortions. The chances that the 4 aunts all had abortions and nobody knew it are astronomically small. I'll bet my life that my grandma didn't. Women do die of breast cancer without having an abortion first. You do know this, right? P.S. Could you start another thread about this or something? I shouldn't have commented on it not once, but twice now. This is not the place.
Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: Quote:Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK: Quote:Originally posted by SIGNYM: Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: Quote:Originally posted by 1KIKI: I was musing on the percent of US women who'll get breast cancer in their lifetime. For some reason I thought the figure was 1 in 10. But nah! I told myself. That's too high. So I looked it up. It's actually more than 1 in 10, it's almost 13% of all women. https://w ww.c ancer.gov/types/breast/risk-fact-sheet Based on current incidence rates, 12.9% of women born in the United States today will develop breast cancer at some time during their lives. About 16 per 1,000 women in America had abortions in 2018. It was 29.3 per 1,000 in the 80s. So in any 10 year span, more than 15% of women have abortions. But the breast cancer rate is only 13%. First pregnancy abortions were already known to be the highest correlation with breast cancer. Sounds like it still is the case, despite the denials from SJWs.FALSE https://www.cancer.gov/about-ca ncer/causes-prevention/risk/hormones/reproductive-history-fact-sheet By now, it should be pretty apparent that neither JSF or I or about 100,000 million other Americans trust anything the medical community has to say about anything. Throw a ".gov" on the end of that URL and the trust plummets even further. Although I finished with the fact that SJWs were denying it, I did not choose to include "cue denial by PC activist in 3...2...1..." Think I missed the opportunity? But the reply was right on que. And she even included the PC-scrubbed-of-inconvenient-facts linky which I implied but did not specify. Back when that correlation was first learned, there was a huge storm of PC funds being thrown at gobs of new "studies" with pre-conclusions to disprove the facts. Overwhelming resources to thwart the reality and facts. But the real world facts have continued to prove out the correlation known long ago. Almost funny, if it wasn't so sad. So much "anti-breast-cancer" money thrown at getting more women breast cancer, it is a shame.I ran across some more info. Even Breast Cancer activists are getting sloppy, letting slip some actual facts instead of their PC mantra. https://www.wcrf.org/dietandcancer/breast-cancer-statistics/ Of the nations with the highest rates of breast cancer, US apparently ranks 22nd. On that list, curious how you don't see Brazil, Poland, Columbia, Mexico, Spain, Israel. Israel seems, from what I gather, to encourage offspring. The rest of those are highly Catholic nations. Quote:In addition, the Panel judged there was strong evidence that lactation protects against breast cancer (unspecified menopausal status). And from https://www.wcrf.org/dietandcancer/breast-cancer/ another inconvenient fact: Quote:Oral contraceptives containing both oestrogen and progesterone also cause a small increased risk of breast cancer in young women https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rank ings/highest-catholic-population Of the 10 nations with the greatest Catholic Populations, only USA, France, and Italy are on the top 25 list for breast cancer. And that France entry might not count, not sure of the "metropolitan" notation - perhaps France as a whole does not rank in the top 25. These are the most aggressive abortion nations. Of the 10 nations with the greatest percentage of Catholics, only Italy ranks in the top 25 of breast cancer nations. Golly gee whiz, the nations with the lowest abortion rates also have the lowest breast cancer rates? Say it ain't so, Sally.
Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: Quote:Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK: Quote:Originally posted by SIGNYM: Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: Quote:Originally posted by 1KIKI: I was musing on the percent of US women who'll get breast cancer in their lifetime. For some reason I thought the figure was 1 in 10. But nah! I told myself. That's too high. So I looked it up. It's actually more than 1 in 10, it's almost 13% of all women. https://w ww.c ancer.gov/types/breast/risk-fact-sheet Based on current incidence rates, 12.9% of women born in the United States today will develop breast cancer at some time during their lives. About 16 per 1,000 women in America had abortions in 2018. It was 29.3 per 1,000 in the 80s. So in any 10 year span, more than 15% of women have abortions. But the breast cancer rate is only 13%. First pregnancy abortions were already known to be the highest correlation with breast cancer. Sounds like it still is the case, despite the denials from SJWs.FALSE https://www.cancer.gov/about-ca ncer/causes-prevention/risk/hormones/reproductive-history-fact-sheet By now, it should be pretty apparent that neither JSF or I or about 100,000 million other Americans trust anything the medical community has to say about anything. Throw a ".gov" on the end of that URL and the trust plummets even further. Although I finished with the fact that SJWs were denying it, I did not choose to include "cue denial by PC activist in 3...2...1..." Think I missed the opportunity? But the reply was right on que. And she even included the PC-scrubbed-of-inconvenient-facts linky which I implied but did not specify. Back when that correlation was first learned, there was a huge storm of PC funds being thrown at gobs of new "studies" with pre-conclusions to disprove the facts. Overwhelming resources to thwart the reality and facts. But the real world facts have continued to prove out the correlation known long ago. Almost funny, if it wasn't so sad. So much "anti-breast-cancer" money thrown at getting more women breast cancer, it is a shame.
Quote:Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK: Quote:Originally posted by SIGNYM: Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: Quote:Originally posted by 1KIKI: I was musing on the percent of US women who'll get breast cancer in their lifetime. For some reason I thought the figure was 1 in 10. But nah! I told myself. That's too high. So I looked it up. It's actually more than 1 in 10, it's almost 13% of all women. https://w ww.c ancer.gov/types/breast/risk-fact-sheet Based on current incidence rates, 12.9% of women born in the United States today will develop breast cancer at some time during their lives. About 16 per 1,000 women in America had abortions in 2018. It was 29.3 per 1,000 in the 80s. So in any 10 year span, more than 15% of women have abortions. But the breast cancer rate is only 13%. First pregnancy abortions were already known to be the highest correlation with breast cancer. Sounds like it still is the case, despite the denials from SJWs.FALSE https://www.cancer.gov/about-ca ncer/causes-prevention/risk/hormones/reproductive-history-fact-sheet By now, it should be pretty apparent that neither JSF or I or about 100,000 million other Americans trust anything the medical community has to say about anything. Throw a ".gov" on the end of that URL and the trust plummets even further.
Quote:Originally posted by SIGNYM: Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: Quote:Originally posted by 1KIKI: I was musing on the percent of US women who'll get breast cancer in their lifetime. For some reason I thought the figure was 1 in 10. But nah! I told myself. That's too high. So I looked it up. It's actually more than 1 in 10, it's almost 13% of all women. https://w ww.c ancer.gov/types/breast/risk-fact-sheet Based on current incidence rates, 12.9% of women born in the United States today will develop breast cancer at some time during their lives. About 16 per 1,000 women in America had abortions in 2018. It was 29.3 per 1,000 in the 80s. So in any 10 year span, more than 15% of women have abortions. But the breast cancer rate is only 13%. First pregnancy abortions were already known to be the highest correlation with breast cancer. Sounds like it still is the case, despite the denials from SJWs.FALSE https://www.cancer.gov/about-ca ncer/causes-prevention/risk/hormones/reproductive-history-fact-sheet
Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: Quote:Originally posted by 1KIKI: I was musing on the percent of US women who'll get breast cancer in their lifetime. For some reason I thought the figure was 1 in 10. But nah! I told myself. That's too high. So I looked it up. It's actually more than 1 in 10, it's almost 13% of all women. https://w ww.c ancer.gov/types/breast/risk-fact-sheet Based on current incidence rates, 12.9% of women born in the United States today will develop breast cancer at some time during their lives. About 16 per 1,000 women in America had abortions in 2018. It was 29.3 per 1,000 in the 80s. So in any 10 year span, more than 15% of women have abortions. But the breast cancer rate is only 13%. First pregnancy abortions were already known to be the highest correlation with breast cancer. Sounds like it still is the case, despite the denials from SJWs.
Quote:Originally posted by 1KIKI: I was musing on the percent of US women who'll get breast cancer in their lifetime. For some reason I thought the figure was 1 in 10. But nah! I told myself. That's too high. So I looked it up. It's actually more than 1 in 10, it's almost 13% of all women. https://w ww.c ancer.gov/types/breast/risk-fact-sheet Based on current incidence rates, 12.9% of women born in the United States today will develop breast cancer at some time during their lives.
Quote:In addition, the Panel judged there was strong evidence that lactation protects against breast cancer (unspecified menopausal status).
Quote:Oral contraceptives containing both oestrogen and progesterone also cause a small increased risk of breast cancer in young women
Saturday, October 9, 2021 3:29 PM
Quote:Originally posted by SIGNYM: So, o just looked it up. The average lifetime risk for prostate cancer for men is 13pct, just like the average lifetime risk for women is 13pct for breast cancer. If your risk is seven times higher with BRCA+2 mutation, that's a wopping 90+pct risk! Can be detected with PSA (prostate specific antigen) screening, via blood samples. The overall risk for men is high lifetime exposure to testosterone. Men who started producing testosterone early (longer lifetime exposure) tend to have shorter legs relative to height, bc once they start puberty the growth plates in arm and bone legs fuse and stop growing bone length.
Quote:This is similar to women. What is associated with breast cancers is a high lifetime exposure to estrogen. Early puberty increases the risk,
Quote:while COMPLETED pregnancy and breastfeeding (reduce the risk)
Quote:(stops estrogen production), and chronic under-nutrition reduced the risk. I don't know about men and hormones, but for women being fat also increases the risk, since fat cells also produce estrogen.
Quote: And, in general, drinking too much can increase the risk of both breast and prostate cancers.
Saturday, October 9, 2021 4:00 PM
Quote:Originally posted by Brenda: Laundry day for me in a couple of minutes then out for my walk to enjoy some of a long weekend up here.
Saturday, October 9, 2021 5:06 PM
Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: Quote:Originally posted by Brenda: Laundry day for me in a couple of minutes then out for my walk to enjoy some of a long weekend up here. Long weekend? You got Thanksgiving on Monday, or something else?
Saturday, October 9, 2021 5:07 PM
Saturday, October 9, 2021 5:20 PM
Quote:Originally posted by Brenda: I find the days are getting shorter faster and I have turn on lights earlier in the living room. Got a little space heater I was given for Christmas a couple of years ago that I can turn on if I feel too chilly in the evening which is nice. Looks like it is going to rain off and on all day.
Saturday, October 9, 2021 7:12 PM
1KIKI
Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.
Quote: https://www.wcrf.org/dietandcancer/breast-cancer/ being overweight or obese in young adulthood (between the ages of about 18 and 30 years) DECREASES the risk of premenopausal breast cancer
Quote:being overweight or obese throughout adulthood INCREASES the risk of postmenopausal breast cancer greater weight gain in adulthood INCREASES the risk of postmenopausal breast cancer
Quote:breast cancer is more common after the menopause.
Saturday, October 9, 2021 7:30 PM
Saturday, October 9, 2021 8:14 PM
Quote:Originally posted by 1KIKI: It definitely sounds like fall up in the more northern US and southern Canada! I hate winter, btw if it involves snow+cold. To me either one is more tolerable without the other. Snow just makes everything except being inside more ... difficult. Going out, driving, and walking, and just getting around involves so much more than simply doing. And being cold is sheer misery. Either snow, or cold would be so much more tolerable wihtout the other. And then there's the very short days up that way. Down here in SoCal day length doesn't change all that much. But up there it really makes a difference! Down here in SoCal the longest day is about 14.5h, and the shortest day is of course 9.5h. But up near Portland the longest day is 15.75h and the shortest day is a mere 8.25h! And then there's all the winter storms to add to the gloom. How dreary. Still, one pays for all that green summer and the beautiful blue summer twilights somehow.
Saturday, October 9, 2021 11:07 PM
Quote:Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK: Quote:Originally posted by Brenda: I find the days are getting shorter faster and I have turn on lights earlier in the living room. Got a little space heater I was given for Christmas a couple of years ago that I can turn on if I feel too chilly in the evening which is nice. Looks like it is going to rain off and on all day. Yeah. Heating is one of the very few reasons I sometimes miss the apartment lifestyle. My house is pretty much wide open, being a tri-level. I'm only able to close off two of the bedrooms from the rest of the house, but by doing that I also close off 1/3 of the heat vents in the house as well. A space heater could cost me a fortune to run since I'd be heating the whole house with it. As expensive as natural gas is going to be this winter, it would still cost more to heat the place with electric. -------------------------------------------------- Vaccinated People: "You need to get muh vaccination shots that don't work because I got muh vaccination shots that don't work and I'm afraid of people that didn't get muh vaccination shots that don't work because muh vaccination shots that don't work don't work."
Saturday, October 9, 2021 11:14 PM
Sunday, October 10, 2021 12:24 AM
Quote:Originally posted by Brenda: I can see a house like that being difficult to keep heated in winter. Been hearing about a rise in heating up here to for home owners.
Sunday, October 10, 2021 4:18 AM
SIGNYM
I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.
Quote: JSF: Having first pregnancy just for the purpose of interrupting it via abortion is what actually INCREASES the risk.
Sunday, October 10, 2021 12:10 PM
Sunday, October 10, 2021 1:12 PM
Quote:Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK: Quote:Originally posted by Brenda: I can see a house like that being difficult to keep heated in winter. Been hearing about a rise in heating up here to for home owners. Yeah. It's everywhere. At least we're not in the UK. They're going to pay 6 times as much this winter than they did last winter. -------------------------------------------------- Vaccinated People: "You need to get muh vaccination shots that don't work because I got muh vaccination shots that don't work and I'm afraid of people that didn't get muh vaccination shots that don't work because muh vaccination shots that don't work don't work."
Sunday, October 10, 2021 1:14 PM
Sunday, October 10, 2021 4:13 PM
Quote:Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK: Yeah. Heating is one of the very few reasons I sometimes miss the apartment lifestyle. My house is pretty much wide open, being a tri-level. I'm only able to close off two of the bedrooms from the rest of the house, but by doing that I also close off 1/3 of the heat vents in the house as well.
Sunday, October 10, 2021 4:43 PM
Quote:Originally posted by SIGNYM: Quote: JSF: Having first pregnancy just for the purpose of interrupting it via abortion is what actually INCREASES the risk. What is so magical about a "first" pregnancy ending in abortion, as opposed to a second, or third? Isn't it just the total number of years being pregnant and breastfeeding the important factor? I see no biological mechanism for that "first pregnancy" trope. And since 30% of pregnancies end in spontaneous abortions, have "they" also studied the effect of THAT? That's beyond a woman's control and is certainly a very common experience.
Quote:Link a credible study, or be done.
Sunday, October 10, 2021 5:47 PM
Sunday, October 10, 2021 9:02 PM
Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: IIRC, most cancers are generally considered to be some natural process, but run amok, or in the wrong place/tissue, or unreigned reaction or hormonal situations.
Sunday, October 10, 2021 10:07 PM
Sunday, October 10, 2021 10:22 PM
Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: Quote:Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK: Yeah. Heating is one of the very few reasons I sometimes miss the apartment lifestyle. My house is pretty much wide open, being a tri-level. I'm only able to close off two of the bedrooms from the rest of the house, but by doing that I also close off 1/3 of the heat vents in the house as well. I don't think I understand your concern. I think your bathroom must be between the 2 bedrooms, right? Neither of your bedrooms has water, pipes in the walls, right? I think your heater is currently in the attic. Most heating systems have one vent in a common area, which does not have a shutter on the vent. Often the kitchen, but I don't recall where yours is. The rest of the vents would have a shutter, and/or valve in the ducting. Basements generally gravitate to about 55 degrees, so don't need a huge amount of heating. Unless you are spending a bunch of time there. If you close your bedrooms, and the heating vents in them, then you can heat just the living room and kitchen mostly, with a little bit of basement. Heat rises, so residual diffusion would let some heat into the bedrooms anyhow. Most humans sleep best with a cooler environment - just tuck in with covers, comforter, blanket. Heating just LR and K, plus bathroom seems reasonable. If not enough heat in one area, a fan to help pull out the heat from a vent can help. Why do you need to heat more than the LR, K, bathroom?
Sunday, October 10, 2021 10:23 PM
Quote:Originally posted by SIGNYM: JSF, I'm going to create another thread for your hostility. You turn every pleasant chat into a fight. Who raised you, boy?
Monday, October 11, 2021 12:40 AM
Quote:SIGNYM: JSF, I'm going to create another thread for your hostility. You turn every pleasant chat into a fight. Who raised you, boy? SIX: I did say a few days ago this conversation should be moved from the Garden, dinn't I?
Monday, October 11, 2021 12:47 AM
Quote:Originally posted by SIGNYM: Who raised you, boy?
Monday, October 11, 2021 1:30 PM
Monday, October 11, 2021 4:34 PM
Quote:Originally posted by 1KIKI: Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: IIRC, most cancers are generally considered to be some natural process, but run amok, or in the wrong place/tissue, or unreigned reaction or hormonal situations. Cancerous tissues aren't even a little bit like normal. They ALL stem from genetic abnormalities, which means the cells are abnormal at the most basic level. Nothing about cancer is 'some natural process'. Since you have such a vital misunderstanding, I couldn't bother myself to read any further.
Monday, October 11, 2021 4:38 PM
Quote:Originally posted by SIGNYM: JSF, I'm going to create another thread for your hostility. You turn every pleasant
Quote:chat into a fight.
Monday, October 11, 2021 4:47 PM
Quote:Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN: Quote:Originally posted by SIGNYM: Quote: JSF: Having first pregnancy just for the purpose of interrupting it via abortion is what actually INCREASES the risk. What is so magical about a "first" pregnancy ending in abortion, as opposed to a second, or third? Isn't it just the total number of years being pregnant and breastfeeding the important factor? I see no biological mechanism for that "first pregnancy" trope. And since 30% of pregnancies end in spontaneous abortions, have "they" also studied the effect of THAT? That's beyond a woman's control and is certainly a very common experience. IIRC, most cancers are generally considered to be some natural process, but run amok, or in the wrong place/tissue, or unreigned reaction or hormonal situations. First pregnancy is the first full cycle of powerful hormone storms, in specific stages, over a specific time frame. When this cycle is interrupted in a way evolution did not anticipate, the hormone sequence, which is supposed to stop or counter whatever the prior hormone release did, is disrupted. Uncontrolled hormone release sequence results. I do not recall that the full term but stillborn was specifically identified as increasing risk, but subsequent studies would indicate that the lack of breastfeeding would increase risk. The studies I recall had indicated that miscarriage was equally increasing risk as induced abortions, but now I read that other studies have indicated miscarriages are not as high risk - perhaps evolution has found a way to work around that. Remember, this was all supposed to be about the first pregancy, as I recall - much of what I am reading now does not differentiate between first and any other following pregnancy. I have not heard specifically of any study which stated that non-first pregnancies had any effect on risk, whether they were completed births, or stillbirths, or miscarriages, or induced abortions. Quote:Link a credible study, or be done.
Monday, October 11, 2021 5:13 PM
Monday, October 11, 2021 9:15 PM
Monday, October 11, 2021 9:55 PM
Tuesday, October 12, 2021 1:22 PM
Tuesday, October 12, 2021 3:18 PM
Quote:Originally posted by Brenda: Out for my walk soon. Think I need my umbrella today.
Tuesday, October 12, 2021 3:20 PM
Quote:Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK: I don't remember if I ever mentioned anything in here about my recent computer acquisitions... I have yet to recieve in the post an all in one computer that is going to replace the one I got from my brother years ago that has been driving me nuts recently with the constant slowdown and/or complete non-responsiveness at times. That thing should fly compared to my current one after I put the SSD I bought a few years ago into it and get it all set up. I also bought two desktops from some dude on Craigslist. They're old business PCs. One of them blows away even the new AIO I've got coming, while the other one is right about on par with it, specs wise. I wasn't expecting much, but boy was I shocked at how well they both work. They're the first PC's I've ever had with SSD drives, and these things FLY. Even the lower spec one is better than any PC I've ever owned. It's amazing being able to install an OS in under 10 minutes, and have a computer that boots up and shuts down in mere seconds. They're so tiny. And it's amazing what newer PCs are capable of doing with only a 240 Watt power supply available to them. My last home made PC had a 700 Watt power supply. They always run at the full wattage, so that thing would burn up over 2 kilowatt hours every 3 hours it was turned on. The lesser one is going to be my aunts first computer. I've been trying to get her to buy an entry level one for months ever since she got a smart phone and I was able to shut down my internet and stream movies to my TV and use my computer for youtube and email by using her unlimited 5G phone as a hotspot. We're going to set it up in her bedroom and use her flat screen TV as the monitor, just like I've done with mine in my living room. Got a few wifi USB nubs on the way so I don't need to have a 12ft wire going to my TV stand and she can connect hers to her phone. Both of those desktops combined, including the wifi, were cheaper than the AIO, and that was already dirt cheap. Huge upgrade to my quality of life and soon to be one for my aunt who doesn't even understand yet how cool this is going to be, and it hardly cost me anything except about a day's worth of work getting them set up and backed up proper. Had I bought these three as recertified refurbs, it would have been over a thousand bucks. I didn't spend 1/4th that. Unless the prices for chips ever become reasonable again, it's possible that my days of building PCs are done. The price of a middling level Ryzen CPU alone is just about as much as I paid for all three of these computers.
Tuesday, October 12, 2021 4:56 PM
Quote:Originally posted by SIGNYM: Quote:Originally posted by Brenda: Out for my walk soon. Think I need my umbrella today. I hope it stays dry for you anyway. ----------- Pity would be no more, If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake
Tuesday, October 12, 2021 8:46 PM
Quote:Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK: Long story short, my conern is money. Winter bills are a different story, and even though I keep it fairly cold in the house, my largest winter bill so far was around $210. That was with good natural gas prices. If we see a huge increase this year like they're predicting, it's going to be an expensive winter heating season.
Tuesday, October 12, 2021 11:33 PM
Wednesday, October 13, 2021 12:08 AM
Wednesday, October 13, 2021 8:32 AM
Wednesday, October 13, 2021 1:20 PM
Wednesday, October 13, 2021 1:21 PM
Quote:Originally posted by 1KIKI: If nothing else, I hope the sound of the rain as you go to sleep is enjoyable.
Wednesday, October 13, 2021 1:46 PM
Quote:Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK: Holy crap... that All In One is HUGE. I guess I underestimated how much larger a 24" monitor would be compared to a 21" monitor on my coffee table. It's making me reconsider my plan here. Had I known I was going to be getting two really nice desktops for near-nothing only several days later, I probably wouldn't have bought it. My TV in my living room is big enough where I'd have no problem using that as my monitor even from across the room if I get a wireless keyboard/mouse combo, so I don't really need an AIO on my coffee table like I've become accustomed to over the years. Not that I have much furniture upstairs, but this AIO could be a TV/Computer combo in the small bedroom. I'm even considering buying another of those tiny desktops for myself when I get one for my friend, assuming the guy still has two left. That could be put on the TV in the master bedroom, and just basically be a backup in case any of the other ones fail over time. I've got a lot of options now. I didn't realize how quickly the tech world had been passing me by. I never would have suspected I could get machines capable of doing what these things do for so little money in 2021. But yeah.... I don't think a 24" AIO is going to work on my coffee table. Maybe if it were an HP AIO with a low center of gravity, but those DELL AIO's come on a stand that probably wouldn't take to kindly to me swinging my coffee table all over the floor when I'm vacuuming or just moving it out of the way on the rare occasion that I'm watching something on the TV. Hell..... Now that I think about it, maybe I could just mount the AIO to the far wall in the porch when I get it remodeled. I don't really want to put a giant TV out there that would entice somebody to break my shiny new windows to steal. It's small enough where I think the chances of that happening would be pretty low, but it is still large enough to put a game on or something while I have people over for poker night (yes... that will be a thing when I finally get my house in shape for it).
Wednesday, October 13, 2021 2:42 PM
Wednesday, October 13, 2021 5:10 PM
YOUR OPTIONS
NEW POSTS TODAY
OTHER TOPICS
FFF.NET SOCIAL